Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:38:05.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Italian Nationality Problem of the Austrian Empire1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Kent Roberts Greenfield
Affiliation:
Baltimore, Maryland

Extract

In 1713 Austria acquired the duchy of Milan, even then the richest part of Italy, and after 1748 it extended its ascendancy over all the states of the Italian peninsula. Not only did they accept Austrian hegemony without resistance, but the Italians played a part in the administration of the empire. At the court of Maria Theresa Italians did not find themselves in an alien environment. The Vienna of that age, to use Franco Valsecchi's happy phrase, delighted in “the melodious culture of Italy.” Viennese operas were composed to Italian libretti. Mozart was hardly less an Italian than a Germanic composer. The empire drew on its Italian-speaking subjects to fill important posts in the administrative and diplomatic services and courts of law. During the later years of Maria Theresa's reign, sons of the conservative Milanese patriciate, imbued with the ideas of the Enlightenment and led by Pietro Verri, Cesare Beccaria, and their associates of the Accademia dei Pugni, cooperated willingly and fruitfully in planning the reforms that Maria Theresa carried out, even though those reforms were undermining the autonomy of their country. The Enlightenment developed simultaneously in Italy and Austria, and for a period the leaders of that movement in Italy looked to Vienna rather than Paris as the citadel of their intellectual and reformist conceptions.

Type
The Slovaks, Ukrainians (Ruthenians), Rumanians, and Italians
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 For views reflected in the foregoing paragraphs, see Wandruszka, Adam, Österreich und Italien im 18. Jahrhundert (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1963)Google Scholar; and Valsecchi, Franco, L'assolutismo illuminato in Austria e in Lombardia, Vol, II: La Lombardia (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1934). (Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1962).Google Scholar

3 Schroeder, Paul W., Metternich's Diplomacy at its Zenith, 1820–1823Google Scholar

4 For Austro-Italian relations prior to 1861 the references in the critical bibliographical sections of Candeloro, Giorgio, Storia dell' Italia moderna (4 vols., Milan: Feltrinelli, 19561964)Google Scholar, are most valuable.

5 Hantsch, Hugo, Die Nationalitätenfrage im alten Österreich (Vienna: Verlag Herold, 1953), p. 28Google Scholar. Of these, 383, 619 were in the South Tyrol. Pockels, Georg, “Tirol,” in Hugelmann, Karl Gottfried (ed.), Das Nationalitätenrecht des alten Österreichs (Vienna: Braumüller, 1934), p. 547.Google Scholar

6 For the South Tyrol, see de Block, Mathilde, Südtirol (Groningen: Wolters, 1950)Google Scholar; Kramer, Hans, Die Italiener unter der österreichischungarischen Monarchie (Vienna: Verlag Herold, 1954)Google Scholar, written in a conciliatory spirit by a descendant of Austrian officials who served in the South Tyrol; Mayr, Michael, Der italienische Irredentismus: sein Entstehen und seine Entwicklung vornehmlich in Tirol (2nd ed., Innsbruck: Verlagsanstalt Tyrolia, 1937)Google Scholar; and Pockels, , “Tirol.”Google Scholar

7 Pockels, , “Tirol,” p. 551.Google Scholar

8 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 45Google Scholar; Marchetti, Livio, Il Trentino nel Risorgimento (Milan: Albrighi e Segati, 1913), pp. 194199.Google Scholar

9 Block, , Südtirol, p. 19Google Scholar; Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, pp. 43 and 101.Google Scholar

10 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, pp. 3643.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., pp. 106–194, gives a detailed account of 1848–1849 in the South Tyrol.

12 Block, , Südtirol, p. 20Google Scholar; Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 200.Google Scholar

13 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismos, pp. 210 and 223244.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 243; Marchetti, , Il Trentino nel Risorgimento, p. 79.Google Scholar

15 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 222.Google Scholar

16 Kann, Robert A., The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Empire, 1848–1918 (2 vols., New York: Columbia University Press, 1950), Vol. I, pp. 263264.Google Scholar

17 For a discussion of the concern at Vienna over the effect of this boycott, see Sandonà, Augusto, L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche (3 vols., Bologna: Zanichelli, 19321938), Vol. I, pp. 7376.Google Scholar

18 Fiume is not included in the present study. In 1868–1870 it was made an autonomous city, which sent deputies to the Budapest parliament. Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 90.Google Scholar

19 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. II, p. 262, n. 7Google Scholar; Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 17 and 72Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, A., “Die Adrienländer,”Google Scholar in Hugelmann, , Das Nationalitätenrecht des alten Österreichs, p. 578.Google Scholar

20 Hantsch, Hugo, Die Geschichte Österreichs (2 vols., Graz: Steierische Verlagsanstalt, 19471951), Vol. II, pp. 113, 170, 206, and 244Google Scholar; Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 6465 and 7374Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Adrienländer,” p. 572.Google Scholar

21 Mazzini, Giuseppe, “La Pace,” in Scritti politici, Vol. LXXXVI (Imola: Galeati, 1940), pp. 1522.Google Scholar

22 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 7376.Google Scholar

23 Block, , Südtirol, pp. 2630.Google Scholar

24 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 6972Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” p. 588.Google Scholar

25 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 8589.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., pp. 28–89; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 569630.Google Scholar

27 Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 592601.Google Scholar

28 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 275276.Google Scholar

29 Ibid., pp. 10 ff.

30 Ibid., pp. 104–112.

31 Ibid., p. 142.

32 Haines, C. Grove, “Italian Irredentism during the Near Eastern Crisis, 1875–78,” The Journal of Modern History, Vol. IX (1937), pp. 2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar; May, Arthur J., The Hapsburg Monarchy, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951), p. 277Google Scholar. The reinforcement seems to have been a token movement. See Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, p. 277.Google Scholar

33 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. II, pp. 367Google Scholar; Stefani, Giuseppe, “Oberdan,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XXV, p. 103.Google Scholar

34 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle, contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 259271, 275276, and passim.Google Scholar

35 Tamaro, Attilio, “Irredentismo,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XIX, p. 568.Google Scholar

36 Manzone, Bruno, “Dante Alighieri, Società nazionale,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XII, p. 348.Google Scholar

37 For the Pro Patria Society, see Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. II, pp. 127169.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., pp. 177–178.

39 Por the Dante monument, see Ibid., pp. 185 ff.

40 Ibid., pp. 268–269.

41 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 64–55.Google Scholar

42 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 313.Google Scholar

43 Wolfe, Eric, “Cultural Dissonance in the Italian Alps,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. V (19611962), pp. 112.Google Scholar I am gratefully indebted to Dr. Emanuel Fenz, of Purdue University, for calling my attention to this reference.

44 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 6062.Google Scholar

45 The information given in the account which follows was drawn largely from Ibid., pp. 64–97.

46 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 316Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” p. 628.Google Scholar

47 May, , The Hapaburg Monarchy, pp. 334335Google Scholar; Landini, Piero, “Trieste,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XXXIV, p. 329.Google Scholar

48 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 7982Google Scholar; Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 568.Google Scholar

49 Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 587589.Google Scholar

50 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 66.Google Scholar

51 Ibid., pp. 77–79.

52 It even dissolved the Slav councils of Sebenico and Spalato. Ibid., p. 67.

53 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, pp. 265266Google Scholar; and Vol. II, p. 223. For example, the Italians had one representative for every 38,000 inhabitants, while the Germans had one for every 40,000.

54 For example, Gayda, Virginio, Modern Austria (New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1915), pp. 2736Google Scholar and passim; Villari, Luigi, The Expansion of Italy (London: Faber, 1930), pp. 124, 164167, and passim.Google Scholar

55 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, p. 261.Google Scholar

56 Valiani, Leo, “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,”Google Scholar in Rapporta du XIIe Congrès International des Sciences Historiques (Vienna: Berger, 1965), Vol. I, pp. 251–256. In his volume La dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria (Milan: Saggiatore, 1966), p. 13 and n. 8Google Scholar, Professor Valiani cites additional evidence that only a small minority of the population of Trieste were irredentists.

57 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 426Google Scholar; Askew, William C., “The Austro-Italian Antagonism, 1896–1914,” in Wallace, Lillian P. and Askew, William C. (eds.), Power, Public Opinion, and Diplomacy (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1959), p. 217Google Scholar; Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 569.Google Scholar

58 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 34.Google Scholar

59 Pockels, , “Tirol,” p. 563.Google Scholar

60 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter dar österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 35.Google Scholar

61 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 426.Google Scholar

62 Ibid., pp. 336–337.

63 Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 568.Google Scholar

64 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. III, p. 123.Google Scholar

65 Valiani, , “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,” p. 252.Google Scholar

66 Chancellor von Bülow to Count Monts, June 9, 1903, in Die Grosse Politik der europäischen Kabinette (40 vols., Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 19221927), Vol. XVIII, p. 617.Google Scholar

67 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 392.Google Scholar See also Askew, , “The Austro-Italian Antagonism, 18961914,” p. 218.Google Scholar

68 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, pp. 392 and 473.Google Scholar

69 Ibid., p. 303.

70 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, pp. 46, 260, and 265.Google Scholar

71 Jászi, Oscar, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1929), p. 394.Google Scholar

72 Valiani, , “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,” pp. 251256.Google Scholar