Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2009
In 1713 Austria acquired the duchy of Milan, even then the richest part of Italy, and after 1748 it extended its ascendancy over all the states of the Italian peninsula. Not only did they accept Austrian hegemony without resistance, but the Italians played a part in the administration of the empire. At the court of Maria Theresa Italians did not find themselves in an alien environment. The Vienna of that age, to use Franco Valsecchi's happy phrase, delighted in “the melodious culture of Italy.” Viennese operas were composed to Italian libretti. Mozart was hardly less an Italian than a Germanic composer. The empire drew on its Italian-speaking subjects to fill important posts in the administrative and diplomatic services and courts of law. During the later years of Maria Theresa's reign, sons of the conservative Milanese patriciate, imbued with the ideas of the Enlightenment and led by Pietro Verri, Cesare Beccaria, and their associates of the Accademia dei Pugni, cooperated willingly and fruitfully in planning the reforms that Maria Theresa carried out, even though those reforms were undermining the autonomy of their country. The Enlightenment developed simultaneously in Italy and Austria, and for a period the leaders of that movement in Italy looked to Vienna rather than Paris as the citadel of their intellectual and reformist conceptions.
2 For views reflected in the foregoing paragraphs, see Wandruszka, Adam, Österreich und Italien im 18. Jahrhundert (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1963)Google Scholar; and Valsecchi, Franco, L'assolutismo illuminato in Austria e in Lombardia, Vol, II: La Lombardia (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1934). (Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1962).Google Scholar
3 Schroeder, Paul W., Metternich's Diplomacy at its Zenith, 1820–1823Google Scholar
4 For Austro-Italian relations prior to 1861 the references in the critical bibliographical sections of Candeloro, Giorgio, Storia dell' Italia moderna (4 vols., Milan: Feltrinelli, 1956–1964)Google Scholar, are most valuable.
5 Hantsch, Hugo, Die Nationalitätenfrage im alten Österreich (Vienna: Verlag Herold, 1953), p. 28Google Scholar. Of these, 383, 619 were in the South Tyrol. Pockels, Georg, “Tirol,” in Hugelmann, Karl Gottfried (ed.), Das Nationalitätenrecht des alten Österreichs (Vienna: Braumüller, 1934), p. 547.Google Scholar
6 For the South Tyrol, see de Block, Mathilde, Südtirol (Groningen: Wolters, 1950)Google Scholar; Kramer, Hans, Die Italiener unter der österreichischungarischen Monarchie (Vienna: Verlag Herold, 1954)Google Scholar, written in a conciliatory spirit by a descendant of Austrian officials who served in the South Tyrol; Mayr, Michael, Der italienische Irredentismus: sein Entstehen und seine Entwicklung vornehmlich in Tirol (2nd ed., Innsbruck: Verlagsanstalt Tyrolia, 1937)Google Scholar; and Pockels, , “Tirol.”Google Scholar
7 Pockels, , “Tirol,” p. 551.Google Scholar
8 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 45Google Scholar; Marchetti, Livio, Il Trentino nel Risorgimento (Milan: Albrighi e Segati, 1913), pp. 194–199.Google Scholar
9 Block, , Südtirol, p. 19Google Scholar; Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, pp. 43 and 101.Google Scholar
10 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, pp. 36–43.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., pp. 106–194, gives a detailed account of 1848–1849 in the South Tyrol.
12 Block, , Südtirol, p. 20Google Scholar; Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 200.Google Scholar
13 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismos, pp. 210 and 223–244.Google Scholar
14 Ibid., p. 243; Marchetti, , Il Trentino nel Risorgimento, p. 79.Google Scholar
15 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 222.Google Scholar
16 Kann, Robert A., The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in the Habsburg Empire, 1848–1918 (2 vols., New York: Columbia University Press, 1950), Vol. I, pp. 263–264.Google Scholar
17 For a discussion of the concern at Vienna over the effect of this boycott, see Sandonà, Augusto, L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche (3 vols., Bologna: Zanichelli, 1932–1938), Vol. I, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
18 Fiume is not included in the present study. In 1868–1870 it was made an autonomous city, which sent deputies to the Budapest parliament. Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 90.Google Scholar
19 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. II, p. 262, n. 7Google Scholar; Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 17 and 72Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, A., “Die Adrienländer,”Google Scholar in Hugelmann, , Das Nationalitätenrecht des alten Österreichs, p. 578.Google Scholar
20 Hantsch, Hugo, Die Geschichte Österreichs (2 vols., Graz: Steierische Verlagsanstalt, 1947–1951), Vol. II, pp. 113, 170, 206, and 244Google Scholar; Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 64–65 and 73–74Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Adrienländer,” p. 572.Google Scholar
21 Mazzini, Giuseppe, “La Pace,” in Scritti politici, Vol. LXXXVI (Imola: Galeati, 1940), pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
22 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
23 Block, , Südtirol, pp. 26–30.Google Scholar
24 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 69–72Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” p. 588.Google Scholar
25 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., pp. 28–89; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 569–630.Google Scholar
27 Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 592–601.Google Scholar
28 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 275–276.Google Scholar
29 Ibid., pp. 10 ff.
30 Ibid., pp. 104–112.
31 Ibid., p. 142.
32 Haines, C. Grove, “Italian Irredentism during the Near Eastern Crisis, 1875–78,” The Journal of Modern History, Vol. IX (1937), pp. 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; May, Arthur J., The Hapsburg Monarchy, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951), p. 277Google Scholar. The reinforcement seems to have been a token movement. See Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, p. 277.Google Scholar
33 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. II, pp. 3–67Google Scholar; Stefani, Giuseppe, “Oberdan,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XXV, p. 103.Google Scholar
34 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle, contese diplomatiche, Vol. I, pp. 259–271, 275–276, and passim.Google Scholar
35 Tamaro, Attilio, “Irredentismo,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XIX, p. 568.Google Scholar
36 Manzone, Bruno, “Dante Alighieri, Società nazionale,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XII, p. 348.Google Scholar
37 For the Pro Patria Society, see Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. II, pp. 127–169.Google Scholar
38 Ibid., pp. 177–178.
39 Por the Dante monument, see Ibid., pp. 185 ff.
40 Ibid., pp. 268–269.
41 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 64–55.Google Scholar
42 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 313.Google Scholar
43 Wolfe, Eric, “Cultural Dissonance in the Italian Alps,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. V (1961–1962), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar I am gratefully indebted to Dr. Emanuel Fenz, of Purdue University, for calling my attention to this reference.
44 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 60–62.Google Scholar
45 The information given in the account which follows was drawn largely from Ibid., pp. 64–97.
46 Mayr, , Der italienische Irredentismus, p. 316Google Scholar; Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” p. 628.Google Scholar
47 May, , The Hapaburg Monarchy, pp. 334–335Google Scholar; Landini, Piero, “Trieste,” Enciclopedia italiana, Vol. XXXIV, p. 329.Google Scholar
48 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, pp. 79–82Google Scholar; Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 568.Google Scholar
49 Manussi-Montesole, , “Die Adrienländer,” pp. 587–589.Google Scholar
50 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 66.Google Scholar
51 Ibid., pp. 77–79.
52 It even dissolved the Slav councils of Sebenico and Spalato. Ibid., p. 67.
53 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, pp. 265–266Google Scholar; and Vol. II, p. 223. For example, the Italians had one representative for every 38,000 inhabitants, while the Germans had one for every 40,000.
54 For example, Gayda, Virginio, Modern Austria (New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1915), pp. 27–36Google Scholar and passim; Villari, Luigi, The Expansion of Italy (London: Faber, 1930), pp. 124, 164–167, and passim.Google Scholar
55 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, p. 261.Google Scholar
56 Valiani, Leo, “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,”Google Scholar in Rapporta du XIIe Congrès International des Sciences Historiques (Vienna: Berger, 1965), Vol. I, pp. 251–256. In his volume La dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria (Milan: Saggiatore, 1966), p. 13 and n. 8Google Scholar, Professor Valiani cites additional evidence that only a small minority of the population of Trieste were irredentists.
57 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 426Google Scholar; Askew, William C., “The Austro-Italian Antagonism, 1896–1914,” in Wallace, Lillian P. and Askew, William C. (eds.), Power, Public Opinion, and Diplomacy (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1959), p. 217Google Scholar; Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 569.Google Scholar
58 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 34.Google Scholar
59 Pockels, , “Tirol,” p. 563.Google Scholar
60 Kramer, , Die Italiener unter dar österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, p. 35.Google Scholar
61 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 426.Google Scholar
62 Ibid., pp. 336–337.
63 Tamaro, , “Irredentismo,” p. 568.Google Scholar
64 Sandonà, , L'irredentismo nelle lotte politiche e nelle contese diplomatiche, Vol. III, p. 123.Google Scholar
65 Valiani, , “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,” p. 252.Google Scholar
66 Chancellor von Bülow to Count Monts, June 9, 1903, in Die Grosse Politik der europäischen Kabinette (40 vols., Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft für Politik und Geschichte, 1922–1927), Vol. XVIII, p. 617.Google Scholar
67 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, p. 392.Google Scholar See also Askew, , “The Austro-Italian Antagonism, 1896–1914,” p. 218.Google Scholar
68 May, , The Hapsburg Monarchy, pp. 392 and 473.Google Scholar
69 Ibid., p. 303.
70 Kann, , The Multinational Empire, Vol. I, pp. 46, 260, and 265.Google Scholar
71 Jászi, Oscar, The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1929), p. 394.Google Scholar
72 Valiani, , “Le correnti politiche italiane e la dissoluzione dell'Austria-Ungheria,” pp. 251–256.Google Scholar