Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:47:59.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Masters of Sustainable Practice: A Review of a Program for Working Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2015

Ruwini Edirisinghe  and
Kym Fraser
Ruwini Edirisinghe*
Affiliation:
School of Property Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Kym Fraser
Affiliation:
Adjunct Associate Professor, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Ruwini Edirisinghe, School of Property Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study sought to distil recommendations and curriculum design principles that could underpin the re-imagination of the RMIT University coursework Masters of Sustainable Practice (MSP). The aim of the study was to redesign the program to better meet the expectations of contemporary working professionals. Four data sources were used to develop 12 program recommendations: postgraduate sustainability education literature, postgraduate coursework literature, publicly available information for contemporary coursework Masters sustainability programs both in Australia and overseas, and interview data from current and graduate students from the RMIT University Masters of Sustainable Practice. The study proposes a novel curriculum (re)design model comprised of six curriculum design principles that the authors argue are essential for the development of curricula for contemporary working professionals. Sustainable practice coursework Masters programs need to: offer choice, flexibility and authentic work-based assessment opportunities; provide significant guidance to achieve individual aspirations and to customise the program for each student; recognise learning through current workplace roles and through continuing professional development opportunities; use integrative assessments to achieve the Australian Qualification Framework knowledge and skills application requirements; incorporate short credit-bearing courses, in particular for the development of employability skills; and support students to transition to professional practice.

Keywords

sustainable practiceenvironmental educationpart-time studentsmasterscourseworkprogram renewal/redesign
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 239 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amran, A., Nabiha, S., Khalid, A., Razak, D.A., & Haron, H. (2010). Development of MBA with specialisation in sustainable development: The experience of Universiti Sains Malaysi. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, 260–273.Google Scholar
Australian Qualifications Framework Council (AQF). (2011). Australian Qualifications Framework Council for the Ministerial Council for Tertiary Education and Employment. Retrieved from from http://www.aqf.edu.au/AbouttheAQF/TheAQF/HistoryoftheAQF/tabid/95/Default.aspGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, S.J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Learning on demand, at your own pace, in rapid bite-sized chunks: The future shape of Management Development? Learning and Education, 7, 571–586.Google Scholar
Bootsma, M., & Vermeulen, W. (2011). Experiences of environmental professionals in practice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 163–176.Google Scholar
Brandão, C.R. (2008). Minha casa, o mundo [My home, the world]. Aparecida, Brazil: Idéias e Letras.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment Water Heritage and the Arts. (2009). Living sustainably: The Australian government's national action plan for education for sustainability. Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
duPreez, N.P., & Möhr-Swart, M. (2004). An integrated approach to environmental education: A case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5, 11–20.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (2011). Monitoring risk and return: Critical insights into graduate coursework engagement and outcomes AUSSE Research Briefing (vol. 9). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Fenner, R.A., Ainger, C.M., Cruickshank, H.J., & Guthrie, P.M. (2005). Embedding sustainable development at Cambridge University Engineering Department. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, H., Laxton, R., Moran, , van der werf, J., & Banks, R. (2009). Postgraduate coursework in Australia: issues emerging from university and industry collaboration. Higher Education, 57, 641–655.Google Scholar
Gadotti, M. (2010). Reorienting education practices towards sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4, 203–211.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. (1997). Infonuggets. The bite-size future of corporate training? Training, 34, 26–33.Google Scholar
Hart, P., & Kood, R. (1999). Starting points: Questions of quality in environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, 104–124.Google Scholar
Kearins, K., & Springett, D. (2003). Educating for sustainability: Developing critical skills. Journal of Management Education, 27, 188–204.Google Scholar
Ketlhoilwe, M.J., & Maila, M.W. (2008). Exploring issues of relevance and quality in the context of a university programme. South African Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 133–148.Google Scholar
Klein, D., & Ware, M. (2003). E-learning: New opportunities in continuing professional development. Learned Publishing, 16, 34–46.Google Scholar
Lupele, J. (2008). Underlying mechanisms affecting institutionalisation of environmental education courses in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 113–131.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H. (1989). Harvesting one hundredfold: Key concepts and case studies in environmental education Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
Meehan, B., & Thomas, I. (2006). Teamwork: Education for entrants to the environment professions. Environmental Education Research, 12, 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, G., Alkaff, H., Garrison, D., & Golley, F. (2005). Assessing the environmental literacy requirement at the University of Georgia. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36, 3–9.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. (2005). E-learning ‘bites’ for adult learners: Mixed messages from research. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 10, 403–422.Google Scholar
Savanick, S., Strong, R., & Manning, C. (2008). Explicitly linking pedagogy and facilities to campus sustainability: Lessons from Carleton College and the University of Minnesota. Environmental Education Research, 14, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, N. (2007). Integrative assessment: Blending assignments and assessments for high-quality learning Guide 3. Retrieved from http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/publications/blending-assignments-and-assessments.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sibbel, A. (2009). Pathways towards sustainability through higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 68–82.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. (2010). Transforming higher education: A practical plan for integrating sustainability education in the student experience. Journal of Sustainability Education, 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Stubs, W., & Schapper, J. (2011). Two approaches to curriculum development for educating for sustainability and CSR. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2, 259–268.Google Scholar
Tilbury, D., & Wortman, D. (2004). Engaging people in sustainability. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development:Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1991). Our common future (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar