Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:28:31.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variable verb placement in second-language German and French: Evidence from production and elicited imitation of finite and nonfinite negated sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

SARAH SCHIMKE
SARAH SCHIMKE*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Laboratoire Structures Formelles du Langage, CNRS and Université Paris 8
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Sarah Schimke, Department of German Studies, University of Osnabrück, Neuer Graben 40, Osnabrück 49074, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the placement of finite and nonfinite lexical verbs and finite light verbs (LVs) in semispontaneous production and elicited imitation of adult beginning learners of German and French. Theories assuming nonnativelike syntactic representations at early stages of development predict variable placement of lexical verbs and consistent placement of LVs, whereas theories assuming nativelike syntax predict variability for nonfinite verbs and consistent placement of all finite verbs. The results show that beginning learners of German have consistent preferences only for LVs. More advanced learners of German and learners of French produce and imitate finite verbs in more variable positions than nonfinite verbs. This is argued to support a structure-building view of second-language development.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 635 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. R. (1974). Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, M. (1998). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 311–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. (2005). The semantic knowledge base for the acquisition of negation and the acquisition of finiteness. In Hendriks, H. (Ed.), The structure of learner varieties (pp. 263–314). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begg, I. (1971). Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. (1993). Temporal reference in German child language: Form and function of early verb use. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bernini, G. (2000). Negative items and negation strategies in non-native Italian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 399–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binet, A., & Henry, V. (1894). La mémoire des phrases. Année Psychologique, 1, 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Bock, J., & Brewer, W. (1974). Reconstructive recall in sentences with alternative surface structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 837–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1988). Critical phases of grammar development: A study of the acquisition of negation in children and adult. In Jordens, P. & Lalleman, J. (Eds.), Language Development (pp. 123–148). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1990). The comparative study of first and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Penke, M., & Parodi, T. (1993). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition, 3, 395–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C. (2006). The finite story. Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from http://corpus1.mpi.nl/ds/imdi_browser?openpath=MPI560350%23Google Scholar
Dimroth, C., Gretsch, P., Jordens, P., Perdue, C., & Starren, M. (2003). Finiteness in Germanic languages. A stage-model for first and second language development. In Dimroth, C. & Starren, M. (Eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 65–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohadjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 677–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1993/1994). On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1996). Negation in early German–English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research, 12, 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories. The acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Fillenbaum, S. (1966). Memory for gist: Some relevant variables. Language and Speech, 9, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, S. (1986). Production vs. comprehension: Differences in underlying competences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, 17, 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, P. (2003). Negation and relational predicates in French and English as second languages. In Dimroth, C. & Starren, M. (Eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 119–159). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamayan, E., Saegert, J., & Larudee, P. (1977). Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech, 20, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilization in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 34, 75–90.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. (1997). L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence. In Hughes, E., Hughes, M., & Greenhill, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 245–256). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, E., Hughes, M., & Greenhill, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (2001). Missing inflection in second language French: Accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research, 17, 273–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is “is” easier than -s?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P., & Stevenson, R. (1970). Memory for syntax. Nature, 227, 412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordens, P., & Dimroth, C. (2006). Finiteness in children and adults learning Dutch. In Bittner, D. & Gagarina, N. (Eds.), Acquisition of verb grammar and verb arguments (pp. 173–200). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (2000). An analysis of the German Perfect. Language, 76, 358–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: couldn't natural language be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S., & Maratsos, M. (1975). What children can say before they will. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 21, 89–111.Google Scholar
Lahey, M., Launer, P., & Schiff-Myers, N. (1983). Prediction of production: Elicited imitation and spontaneous speech productions of language disordered children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasser, I. (1997). Finiteness in adult and child German. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Markman, B., Spilka, I., & Tucker, G. (1975). The use of elicited imitation in search of an interim French grammar. Language Learning, 25, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1983). Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one kind of simplification. In Andersen, R. (Ed.), Pidginization and Creolization and language acquisition (pp. 120–157). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. (1991). Principles of universal grammar and strategies of language use: On the similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. In Eubank, L. (Ed.), Point counterpoint (pp. 231–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 13, 227–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory: The over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hopper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2. A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgement tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In Tarone, E., Gass, S., & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 227–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Naiman, N. (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parodi, T. (2000). Finiteness and verb placement in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 16, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A. (1989). On the emergence of syntax: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierce, A. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–344.Google Scholar
Prévost, P. (2004). Morphological variation in early adult second language French: A cross-sectional study. In Foster-Cohen, S., Sharwood-Smith, M., Sorace, A., & Ota, M. (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook 2004 (pp. 147–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, S., & Marsden, E. (2006). The acquisition of functional cateories in early French second language grammars: The use of finite and nonfinite verbs in negative contexts. Second Language Research, 22, 188–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 437–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, S. (2003). Development of verb morphology and finiteness in children and adults acquiring French. In Dimroth, C. & Starren, M. (Eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 15–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In Hoekstra, T. & Schwartz, B. (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–368). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D., & Welsh, C. (1968). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental pyscholinguistics. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 485–497). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1973). An experimental approach to children's linguistic competence. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 497–521). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Snape, N., Leung, Y.-K. I., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2009). Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct access to X′-theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In Hoekstra, T. & Schwarz, B. (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996a). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12, 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996b). The earliest stages in adult L2 syntax: Additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research, 12, 140–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (2009). Succesful features. Verb raising and adverbs in L2 acquisition under an Organic Grammar approach. In Snape, N., Leung, Y.-K. I., & Smith, M. Sharwood (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 53–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, J. (2005). The role of the auxiliary hebben in Dutch as a second language. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (LiLi), 140, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, J. (2009). Finiteness in Dutch as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and MPI for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J., & Schimke, S. (2009). Differences or fundamental differences? Comment on J. Meisel's article, “Second language acquisition in early childhood.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, E. (1974). On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. (1981). Learning a second language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Zobel, H., & Liceras, J. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition order. Language Learning, 44, 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar