Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:39:30.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pervasiveness of shallow processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2006

Irina A. Sekerina  and
Patricia J. Brooks
Irina A. Sekerina
Affiliation:
College of Staten Island
Patricia J. Brooks
Affiliation:
Graduate Center of the City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clahsen and Felser (CF) offer a novel explanation for the qualitative differences in language processing often observed between adult first language (L1) speakers and second language (L2) learners. They argue that, although L2 learners are successful in drawing on lexical, morphological, and pragmatic sources of information, they underutilize syntactic structure, which results in shallower and less detailed processing than that of native speakers.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 84 - 88
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks P. J., & Sekerina I. A. (in press). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition.
Donaldson M., & Lloyd P. 1974. Sentences and situations: Children's judgements of match and mismatch. In F. Bresson (Ed.), Problème actuels en psycholinguistique (pp. 73– 86). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Ferreira F., Bailey K., & Ferraro V. 2002. Good enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11– 15.Google Scholar
Freeman N. H. 1985. Reasonable errors in basic reasoning. Educational Psychology, 5, 239– 249.Google Scholar
Geurts B. 2003. Quantifying kids. Language Acquisition, 11, 197– 218.Google Scholar
Nation K., Marshall C. M., & Altmann G. T. M. 2003. Investigating individual differences in children's real-time sentence comprehension using language-mediated eye movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 314– 329.Google Scholar
Sanford A. J., & Sturt P. 2002. Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382– 386.Google Scholar
Sekerina I. A. 2004. Misinterpretation and heuristics in bilingual processing. Poster presented at the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Trueswell J. C., Sekerina I. A., Hill N. M., & Logrip M. L. 1999. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89– 134.Google Scholar