Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:48:55.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

US Cultural Resource Management and the ICAHM Charter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ricardo J. Elia
Ricardo J. Elia*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston (MA) 02215, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ICAHM Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage was developed to serve as an international statement of principles and guidelines relevant to archaeological resources (Lund 1989: 15-17]. The need for such a document is great: even a brief survey of archaeological heritage management systems throughout the world (e.g. Cleere 1984; 1989) reveals that no nation currently offers adequate protection to its archaeological heribage. To varying degrees, all nations fall short of realizing the ideals espoused in the Charter. The United States of America, despite having highly developed preservation legislation, regulations and procedures, a full-blown archaeological bureaucracy and more than 20 years of experience in cultural resource management, is no exception.

Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 255 , June 1993 , pp. 426 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION. 1980. Treatment of archaeological properties: a handbook.Google Scholar
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION. 1986. Section 106, step-by-step. Issued October 1986.Google Scholar
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. 1979. Guide to Departments of Anthropology 1979-80. 18th edition. Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. 1991. AAA Guide: A Guide to Departments. A Directory of Members. 30th edition. Washington (DC): American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Arden, H. 1989. Who owns our past? National Geographic 175 (3): 376–92.Google Scholar
Butler, W.B. (ed.). 1992. State Archeological Education Programs. National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Division of National Preservation Programs. Interagency Archeological Services.Google Scholar
Canouts, V. 1992. NADB - The National Archeological Database, Federal Archeology Report. 5 (3): 1ff.Google Scholar
Cheek, A.L. 1991. Protection of archaeological resources on public lands: history of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 33–40.Google Scholar
Cleere, H. (ed.). 1984. Approaches to the archaeological heritage: a comparative study of world cultural resource management systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cleere, H. (Ed.). 1989. Archaeological heritage management in the modern world. London: Unwin Hyman. One World Archaeology 9.Google Scholar
Davis, H.A. 1989. Learning by doing: this is no way to treat archaeological resources, in Cleere, (ed.): 275–79.Google Scholar
Dutton, D.H. 1992. Archeology and the conservation ethic: a call for some re-thinking and re-education, CRM 15: 29–30.Google Scholar
Elia, R.J. 1990. Reflections on contract archaeology in the 1980s, Rulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society 51: 86–9.Google Scholar
Elia, R.J. 1992a. The ethics of collaboration: archaeologists and the Whydah project, Historical Archaeology 26: 105–17.Google Scholar
Elia, R.J. 1992b. Houston company penalized, Archaeology 45: 25ff.Google Scholar
Elia, R.J. 1992c. The need for professional training in archaeological heritage management, Context (Newsletter of the Center for Archaeological Studies at Boston University) 10: 17–20.Google Scholar
Fagan, B. 1988. Black day at Slack Farm, Archaeology 41: 15ff.Google Scholar
Fitting, J.E. 1982. The status of rescue archeology in North America, in Wilson, R.L. & Loyola, G. (ed.), Rescue archeology: papers from the first New World conference on rescue archeology: 173–90. Washington (DC): Preservation Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. 1992. A shield from marauders: The US can help stop wartime destruction of the world’s heritage, The Washington Post 5 July 1992: C4.Google Scholar
Fowler, D.D. 1986. Conserving American archaeological resources, in Meitzer, et al (ed.): 135–62.Google Scholar
Fowler, J.M. 1987. The federal government as standard bearer, in Stipe, & Lee, (ed.): 35–81.Google Scholar
Henderson, A.G. 1989. The Kentucky Archaeological Registry: Landowner participation in site preservation. Archaeological Assistance Program, Technical Brief No. 6. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service.Google Scholar
Hester, J.J. 1987. Archeology on the cheap, in Wilson, R.L. (ed.), Rescue archeology: proceedings of the second New World conference on rescue archeology: 193–200. Dallas (TX): Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Hutt, S. Jones, E.W. & Mcallister, M.E. 1992. Archeological Resource Protection. Washington: Preservation Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, B. & Kirkorian, C. 1991. Protecting sites at the local level: the responsibility and the legal authority towns have to protect their archaeological resources, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 247–52.Google Scholar
Keel, B.C. Mcmanamon, F.P & Smith, G.S. 1989. Federal archeology: the current program. Annual report to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program FY 1985 and FY 1986, Washington (DC): U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.Google Scholar
King, T.F. 1991. Some dimensions of the pothunting problem, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 83–92.Google Scholar
King, T.F. Parker, P.L. & Berg, G. 1997. Anthropology in historic preservation: caring for culture’s clutter. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Knudson, R. 1986. Contemporary cultural resource management, in Meitzer, et al. (ed.): 395–413.Google Scholar
Knudson, R. 1991. The archaeological public trust in context, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 3–8.Google Scholar
Llpe, W.D. 1974. A conservation model for American archaeology, The Kiva 39: 213–45.Google Scholar
Lund, C. 1989. A Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage, ICOMOS Information: 15–24.Google Scholar
Lyon, E.A. 1987. Where the action is: preservation and local governments, in Stipe, & Lee, (ed.): 113–44.Google Scholar
Mcgimsey III, C.R. & Davis, H.A. 1984. United States of America, in Cleere, (ed.): 116–124.Google Scholar
Mcmanamon, F.P. 1991. The federal government’s recent response to archeological looting, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 261–70.Google Scholar
Mcmanamon, F.P. & Nordby, L.V. 1992. Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Arizona State Law Journal 24: 217–52.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D.J., Fowler, D.D. & Sabloff, J.A. (ed.). 1986. American archaeology past and future: a celebration of the Society for American Archaeology 1935–1985. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Michel, M. 1991. The archaeological conservancy and site protection, in Smith, & Ehrenhard, (ed.): 283–89.Google Scholar
O’keefe, P.J. & Prott, L.V. 1984. Law and the cultural heritage 1: Discovery and excavation. Abingdon: Professional Books.Google Scholar
Price III, H.M. 1991. Disputing the dead: US Law on Aboriginal remains and grave goods. Columbia (MO): University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
RAND MCNALLY & CO. 1983. Rand McNally Atlas of the United States. Chicago (IL): Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Siehr, K. 1992a. Preliminary draft UNIDROIT convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural objects (approved by the UNIDROIT study group on the international protection of cultural property at its third session on 26 January 1990), International Journal of Cultural Property 1 (1): 252–5.Google Scholar
Siehr, K. 1992b. The UNIDROIT draft convention on the international protection of cultural property, International Journal of Cultural Property 1 (2): 321–30.Google Scholar
Smith, G.E. & Ehrenhard, J.E. 1991. Protecting the past. Ann Arbor (CT): CRC Press.Google Scholar
Stark, M.T. 1992. Where the money goes: current trends in archaeological funding, in Wandsnider, LuAnn (ed.), Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future: 41–58. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University, Center for Archaeological Investigations. Occasional paper 20.Google Scholar
Stipe, R.E. 1987. Historic preservation: the process and the actors, in Stipe, & Lee, (ed.): 1–34.Google Scholar
Stipe, R.E. & Lee, A.J. (ed.). 1987. The American mosaic: preserving a nation’s heritage. Washington (DC): Preservation Press.Google Scholar
Storey, B.A. 1987. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation: its role in the developing American preservation program, in Johnson, R.W. & Schene, M.G. (ed.), Cultural Resources Management: 121–48. Malabar (FL): R.E. Krieger.Google Scholar
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 1991. Legacy Resource Management Program. Report to Congress September 1991. Washington (DC): Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Environment.Google Scholar
US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE. 1983. Archeology and historic preservation; Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, Federal Register 48 (190): 44716–42.Google Scholar
US GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE. 1987. Cultural resources: problems protecting and preserving federal archeological resources. Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington (DC): US General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
US GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE. 1988. Cultural resources: implementation of federal historic preservation program can be improved. Report to Congressional Requesters. Washington (DC): US General Accounting Office.Google Scholar