Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:59:10.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roots of diversity in a Linearbandkeramik community: isotope evidence at Aiterhofen (Bavaria, Germany)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2011

Penny Bickle ,
Daniela Hofmann ,
R. Alexander Bentley ,
Robert Hedges ,
Julie Hamilton ,
Fernando Laiginhas ,
Geoff Nowell ,
D. Graham Pearson ,
Gisela Grupe  and
Alasdair Whittle
Penny Bickle
Affiliation:
1Department of Archaeology and Conservation, Cardiff University, Humanities Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Daniela Hofmann
Affiliation:
2Cardiff University Centre for Lifelong Learning, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff CF 24 4AG, UK (Email: [email protected])
R. Alexander Bentley
Affiliation:
3Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, 43 Woodland Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK (Email: [email protected])
Robert Hedges
Affiliation:
4Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Julie Hamilton
Affiliation:
4Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Fernando Laiginhas
Affiliation:
5Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
Geoff Nowell
Affiliation:
5Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
D. Graham Pearson
Affiliation:
5Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
Gisela Grupe
Affiliation:
6Ludwig-Maximilians University, Biozentrum der LMU Biologie, Grosshaderner Str.2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Munich, Germany (Email: [email protected])
Alasdair Whittle
Affiliation:
1Department of Archaeology and Conservation, Cardiff University, Humanities Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK (Email: [email protected]; [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early Neolithic in northern Central Europe ought to be the theatre in which incoming farmers meet local hunter-gatherers, with greater or lesser impact. By way of contrast, the authors use isotope analysis in a cemetery beside the Danube to describe a peaceful, well-integrated community with a common diet and largely indigenous inhabitants. Men and women may have had different mobility strategies, but the isotopes did not signal special origins or diverse food-producing roles. Other explanations attend the variations in the burial rites of individuals and their distribution into cemetery plots.

Keywords

GermanyNeolithicLBKisotope analysisdiversityfirst farmers
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 330 , December 2011 , pp. 1243 - 1258
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, S.H. 1990. Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asam, T., Grupe, G. & Peters, J.. 2006. Menschliche Subsistenzstrategien im Neolithikum: eine Isotopenanalyse bayerischer Skelettfunde. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 64: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A. 2006. Strontium isotopes from the Earth to the archaeological skeleton: a review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 135–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A. 2007. Mobility, specialisation and community diversity in the Linearbandkeramik: isotopic evidence from the skeletons, in Whittle, A. & Cummings, V. (ed.) Going over: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe (Proceedings of the British Academy 144): 117–40. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
Bentley, R.A. & Knipper, C.. 2005. Geographical patterns in biologically available strontium, carbon and oxygen isotope signatures in prehistoric SW Germany. Archaeometry 47: 629–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Price, T.D., Üning, J.L, Gronenborn, D., Wahl, J. & Fullagar, P.D.. 2002. Human migration in early Neolithic Europe. Current Anthropology 43: 799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Price, T.D. & Stephan, E.. 2004. Determining the ‘local’ 87Sr/86Sr range for archaeological skeletons. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Wahl, J., Price, T.D. & Atkinson, T.C.. 2008. Isotopic signatures and hereditary traits: snapshot of a Neolithic community in Germany. Antiquity 82: 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickle, P.F. & Hofmann, D.. 2007. Moving on: the contribution of isotope studies to the early Neolithic of Central Europe. Antiquity 81: 1029–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, A. 2004. Neolithic farming in Central Europe: an archaeobotanical study of crop husbandry practices. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaard, A., Krause, R. & Strien, H.-C.. 2011. Towards a social geography of cultivation and plant use in an early farming community: Vaihingen an der Enz, south-west Germany. Antiquity 85: 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulestin, B., Zeeb-Lanz, A., Jeunesse, C., Haack, F., Arbogast, R.-M. & Danaire, A.. 2009. Mass cannibalism in the Linear Pottery Culture at Herxheim (Palatinate, Germany). Antiquity 83: 968–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, P., Millard, A., Chenery, C., Lucy, S. & Roberts, C.. 2004. Investigating population movement by stable isotope analysis: a report from Britain. Antiquity 78: 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. (ed.) 2000. Cultures of relatedness. New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. 2004. After kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coudart, A. 1998. Architecture et société néolithique: l'unité et la variance de la maison danubienne. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Dürrwächter, C., Craig, O.E., Collins, M.J., Burger, J. & Alt, K.W.. 2006. Beyond the grave: variability in Neolithic diets in Southern Germany. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, U. 2003. Matrilokalität in der Bandkeramik? Ein ethnologisches Modell und seine Implikationen. Archäologische Informationen 26: 321–31.Google Scholar
Farruggia, J.-P. 2002. Le cimetière de la Céramique Linéaire d'Aiterhofen (Bavière orientale) dans le contexte de l'Europe centrale. Une crise majeure de la civilisation du Néolithique Danubien des années 5100 avant notre ère. Bulletin de la Societé Préhistorique Luxembourgeoise 23/24: 75–127.Google Scholar
Gronenborn, D. 2009. Climate fluctuations and trajectories to complexity in the Neolithic: towards a theory. Documenta Praehistorica 36: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, F. 2008. Gewandknebel, Geweihknebel, Knochenknebel, Spondylusknebel - zur Technologie, Typologie und Chronologie linienbandkeramischer Grabbeigaben, in Falkenstein, F., Schade-Lindig, S. & Zeeb-Lanz, A. (ed.) Kumpf, Kalotte, Pfeilschaftglätter: zwei Leben für die Archäologie, Gedenkschrift für Annemarie Häusser und Helmut Spatz: 117–28. RahdenWestf: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Hachem, L. 2000. New observations on the Bandkeramik house and social organization. Antiquity 74: 308–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R.E.|M. 2004. Isotopes and red herrings: comments on Milner et al. and Lidén et al. Antiquity 78: 34–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoefs, J. 1996. Stable isotope biogeochemistry. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hofmann, D. 2006. Being Neolithic: life, death and transformation in Neolithic Lower Bavaria. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Ilett, M., Constantin, C., Coudart, A. & Demoule, J.-P. 1982. The late Bandkeramik of the Aisne valley: environment and spatial organisation. Analecta Prehistorica Leidensia 15: 45–61.Google Scholar
Janz, H. & Vennemann, T.W.. 2005. Isotopic composition (O, C, Sr, and Nd) and trace element ratios (Sr/Ca, Mg/Ca) of Miocene marine and brackish ostracods from North Alpine Foreland deposits (Germany and Austria) as indicators for palaeoclimate. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 225: 216–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeunesse, C. 1997. Pratiques funéraires au Néolithique ancien: sépultures et nécropoles danubiennes 5500-4900 av. J.C. Paris: Editions Errance.Google Scholar
Knipper, C. 2009. Mobility in a sedentary society: insights from isotope analysis of LBK human and animal teeth, in Hofmann, D. & Bickle, P. (ed.) Creating communities: new advances in Central European Neolithic research: 142–58. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Lenneis, E. 1995. Altneolithikum: die Bandkeramik, in Lenneis, E., Neugebauer, C.-Maresch & Ruttkay, E. (ed.) Jungsteinzeit im Osten Ö sterreichs: 11–56. St Pölten: Niederösterreichisches Pressehaus.Google Scholar
Lenneis, E. 2007. Mesolithic heritage in early Neolithic burial rituals and personal adornments. Documenta Praehistorica 34: 129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, A. & Zvelebil, M.. 2008. Inter-generational transmission of culture and LBK origins: some indications from eastern Central Europe, in Bailey, D., Whittle, A. & Hofmann, D. (ed.) Living well together? Settlement and materiality in the Neolithic of South-east and Central Europe: 139–50. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Lüning, J. (ed.) 1997. Studien zur neolithischen Besiedlung der Aldenhovener Platte und ihrer Umgebung. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Lüning, J. 2000. Steinzeitliche Bauern in Deutschland: die Landwirtschaft im Neolithikum. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Manen, C. & Mazurie De Keroualin, K.. 2003. Les concepts ‘La Hoguette’ et ‘Limburg’: un bilan des données, in Besse, M., Stahl Gretsch, L.-I. & Curdy, P. (ed.) ConstellaSion: hommage à Alain Gallay: 115–45. Lausanne: Cahiers d'archéologie romande 95.Google Scholar
Mateiciucová, I. 2008. Talking stones: the chipped stone industry in lower Austria and Moravia and the beginnings of the Neolithic in Central Europe (LBK) 5700-4900 cal BC. Brno-Prague: Masarykova Univerzita.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.R.J. 1988. The Linear Pottery culture: diversity in uniformity. Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodermonderzoete 38: 63–139.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J., Evans, J.A. & Cooper, R.E.. 2007. Resolving archaeological populations with Sr-isotope mixing diagrams. Applied Geochemistry 22: 1502–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehlich, O., Montgomery, J., Evans, J., Schade-Lindig, S., Pichler, S.L., Richards, M.P. & Alt, K.W.. 2009. Mobility or migration: a case study from the Neolithic settlement of Nieder-Mörlen (Hessen, Germany). Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 1791–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieszery, N. 1995. Linearbandkeramische Gräberfelder in Bayern. Espelkamp: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
O'connell, T.C. & Hedges, R.E.M.. 1999. Isotopic comparison of hair and bone: Archaeological analyses. Journal of Archaeological Science 26: 661–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oelze, V.M., Siebert, A., Nicklisch, N., Meller, H., Dresely, V. & Alt, K.W.. 2011. Early Neolithic diet and animal husbandry: stable isotope evidence from three Linearbandkeramik (LBK) sites in Central Germany. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 270–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechtl, J. 2009. A monumental prestige patchwork, in Hofmann, D. & Bickle, P. (ed.) Creating communities: new advances in Central European Neolithic Research: 186–201. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Bentley, R.A., Lüning, J., Gronenborn, D. & Wahl, J.. 2001. Prehistoric human migration in the Linearbandkeramik of Central Europe. Antiquity 75: 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramminger, B. 2009. The exchange of LBK adze blades in Central Europe: an example for economic investigations in archaeology, in Hofmann, D. & Bickle, P. (ed.) Creating communities: new advances in Central European Neolithic research: 80–94. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Richards, M.P. & Hedges, R.E.M.. 1999. Stable isotope evidence for similarities in the types of marine foods used by late Mesolithic humans at sites along the Atlantic coast of Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 26: 717–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M.P., Montgomery, J., Nehlich, O. & Grimes, V.. 2008. Isotopic analysis of humans and animals from Vedrovice. Anthropologie: International Journal of the Science of Man 46: 185–94.Google Scholar
Robb, J. & Miracle, P.. 2007. Beyond ‘migration’ versus ‘acculturation’: new models for the spread of agriculture, in Whittle, A. & Cummings, V. (ed.) Going over: the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in north-west Europe (Proceedings of the British Academy 144): 99–115. London: British Academy.Google Scholar
Schweissing, M.M. & Grupe, G.. 2003. Stable strontium isotopes in human teeth and bone: a key to migration events of the late Roman period in Bavaria. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 1373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A. 2003. The archaeology of people: dimensions of Neolithic life. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zvelebil, M. & Pettitt, P.. 2008. Human condition, life and death at an early Neolithic settlement: bioarchaeological analyses of the Vedrovice cemetery and their biosocial implications for the spread of agriculture in Central Europe. Anthropologie: International Journal of the Science of Man 46: 195–218.Google Scholar