Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:04:14.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why study a Greek vase-painter?–a response to Whitley's ‘Beazley as theorist’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John H. Oakley
John H. Oakley*
Affiliation:
Department of Classical Studies, The College of William and Mary in Virginia, Williamsburg VA 23187, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Oakley defends the legacy of Beazley in response to James Whitley's recent analysis of Beazley and his followers (ANTIQUITY 72: 40–47). The debate demonstrates how influential some past figures of archaeological methodology still are, and how diverse are the approaches of modern scholars in interpreting and using their legacy.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 275 , March 1998 , pp. 209 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, M. 1991. Adopting an approach II, in Rasmussen, T. & Spivey, N. (ed.), Looking at Greek vases: 12–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1974. The Pan Painter. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Buitron-Oliver, D. 1995. Douris: a master-painter of Athenian red-figure vases. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Carbon, C.M. 1977. The Berlin Painter and his School. Dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. & Olshaker, M. 1995. Mindhunter. London: Mandarin.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. 1997. Journey into darkness. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Langridge, E.M. 1993. The Eucharides Painter and his place in the Athenian potters’ quarters. Dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Lezzi-Hafter, A. 1976. Der Schuwalow-Maler. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Lezzi-Hafter, A. 1988. Der Eretria-Maler: Werke und Weggefôhrten. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1997. Le peintre des demi-palmettes: aspects iconographiques, in Oakley, J.H., Coulson, W.D.E. & Palagia, O. (ed.), Athenian potters and painters: Conference proceedings: 125—40. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Matheson, S.B. 1995. Polygnotos and vase-painting in classical athens. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Moon, W.G. 1983. The Priam Painter: some iconographic and stylistic considerations, in Moon, W.G. (ed.). Ancient Greek art and iconography: 97–118. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.H. 1990. The Phiale Painter. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.H. 1997. The Achilles Painter. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Rotroff, S.I. & Oakley, J.H. 1992. Debris from a public dining place in the Athenian Agora. Princeton (NJ): American School of Classical Studies. HESPERIA supplement XXV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. 1996. Refiguring Attic red-figure. A review article, revue archàologique: 227–52.Google Scholar
Whitley, J. 1997. Beazley as theorist, Antiquity 71: 40–47.Google Scholar