Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:19:09.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context is everything indeed: a response to Šljivar and Borić

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Miljana Radivojević ,
Thilo Rehren ,
Julka Kuzmanović-Cvetković  and
Marija Jovanović
Miljana Radivojević
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Thilo Rehren
Affiliation:
UCL Qatar, a partner of Hamad bin Khalifa University, PO Box 25256, Doha, Qatar
Julka Kuzmanović-Cvetković
Affiliation:
Museum of Toplica, Ratka Pavlovića 11, 18 400 Prokuplje, Serbia
Marija Jovanović
Affiliation:
Museum of Vojvodina, Dunavska 35, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 342 , December 2014 , pp. 1315 - 1319
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amicone, S. In preparation. Pottery technology in the Vinča culture at the dawn of the metal age. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Institute of Archaeology, University College London.Google Scholar
Avramova, M. 2002. Der Schmuck aus den Gräbern von Durankulak, in Todorova, H. (ed.) Durankulak, BandII—Dieprähistorischen Gräberfelder von Durankulak, Teil1: 191–206. Berlin & Sofia: Anubis.Google Scholar
Bojadžiev, J. 2002. Die absolute Datierung der neo-und äneolithischen Gräberfelder von Durankulak, in Todorova, H. (ed.) Durankulak, Band II—Die prähistorischen Gräberfelder von Durankulak, Teil 1: 67–70. Berlin & Sofia: Anubis.Google Scholar
Boric, D. 2009. Absolute dating of metallurgical innovations in the Vinča culture of the Balkans, in Kienlin, T.L. & Roberts, B.W. (ed.) Metals and societies. Studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway: 191–245. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Chernykh, E.N. 1978. Gornoe Delo i Metallurgiya v Dreivneishei Bolgarii. Sofia: Bolgarskoi Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Dimitrov, K. 2002. Die Metallfunde aus den Gräberfeldern von Durankulak, in Todorova, H. (ed.) Durankulak, Band II—Die prähistorischen Gräberfelder von Durankulak, Teil 1: 127–58. Berlin & Sofia: Anubis.Google Scholar
Glumac, P. & Todd, J.. 1987. New evidence for the use of lead in prehistoric south-east Europe. Archeomaterials 2: 123–45.Google Scholar
Govedarica, B., Pernicka, E. & Rittershofer, K.-F.. 1995. Neue Metallanalysen aus dem Westbalkangebiet, in Jovanović, B. (ed.) Ancient mining and metallurgy in southeast Europe: 265–79. Belgrade: Archaeological Institute.Google Scholar
Higham, T., Chapman, J., Gaydarska, B., Slavchev, V., Honch, N., Yordanov, Y. & Dimitrova, B.. 2007. New perspectives on the Varna cemetery (Bulgaria)—AMS dates and social implications. Antiquity 81: 640–54.Google Scholar
Kuzmanović-Cvetković, J. 1998. Prokuplje, grad sv. Prokopija. Prokuplje: Narodni muzej Toplice.Google Scholar
Radivojević, M., Rehren, TH., Kuzmanović-Cvetković, J., Jovanović, M. & Northover, J.P.. 2013. Tainted ores and the rise of tin bronze metallurgy, c. 6500 years ago. Antiquity 87: 1030–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. & Thornton, C.P. (ed.). 2014. Archaeometallurgy in global perspective. Methods and syntheses. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D. & Kuzmanović-Cvetković, J.. 1997. Pločnik near Prokuplje, the Vinča culture settlement. Journal of the Serbian Archaeological Society 13: 103–13.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D. 1998a. Najstarija metalurgija bakra na Pločniku kod Prokuplja, naselju vinčanske kulture. Arheometalurgija (Belgrade) 6: 1–18.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D. 1998b. Pločnik near Prokuplje, excavation in 1997. Journal of the Serbian Archaeological Society 14: 79–85.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D. 2009a. Pločnik 2008. Field journal of Trench 21. September/October. Report prepared for the National Museum in Belgrade.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D. 2009b. Pločnik, archaeology and conservation. Diana (Belgrade) 13: 56–61.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D., Jacanović, D. & Kuzmanović-Cvetković, J.. 2006. New contributions regarding the copper metallurgy in the Vinča culture, in Tasic, N. & Grozdanov, C. (ed.) Homage to Milutin Garasanin: 251–66. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts & Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Šljivar, D., Kuzmanović-Cvetković, J. & Živkovic, J.. 2012. Belovode, Pločnik: on copper metallurgy in the Vinča culture. Zbornik Narodnog Muzeja (Belgrade) 20: 27–46.Google Scholar
Todorova, H. & Vajsov, I.. 2001. Der kupferzeitliche Schmuck Bulgariens (Prähistorische Bronzefunde 20.6). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar