Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:48:09.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Camels in antiquity: the Hungarian connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

László Bartosiewicz
László Bartosiewicz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Loránd Eötvös University, H-1364 Budapest, POB 107, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A newly discovered deposit of camel bones from post-medieval, Turkish Period Hungary contributes additional information on the role of camels in the Carpathian Basin. By offering an opportunity for reviewing osteological evidence from Hungary, these remains complement our recent knowledge of the history and exploitation of camels in Europe, as recently reported in ANTIQUITY for the western limit of Europe.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 268 , June 1996 , pp. 447 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágoston, G. 1985. Az oszman tuzérség és a magyarorszagi vârharcok egy kiadatlan 17. szäzadi török kronika alapjân I Ottoman artillery and sieges in Hungary on the basis of an unpublished 17th century Turkish chronicle], in Bodo, S. & Szabó, J. (ed.), Magyar és török végvârak 1663-1684 [Hungarian and Turkish forts 1663–1684], Studia Agnen sia 5: 173–83.Google Scholar
Ágoston, G. 1991. Török löpor termelés Budân a 16. szâzadban [Turkish gunpowder production in Buda during the 16th century], in Kovâcs, E. P., Kalmar, J. & Molnär, L. V. (ed.), linger Mâtyâs Emlékkônyv IMâtyâs Unger Memorial Volume): 85–97. Budapest: Pro Renovanda Cultura Hungariae.Google Scholar
Bartosikwicz, L. 1993. Beast of burden from a classical road station in Bulgaria, in Buitenhuis, H. & Clason, A.T (ed.), Archaeozoology of the Near East: 105–9. Leiden: Universal Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys. Google Scholar
Bartosikwicz, L. 1995. Camel remains from Hungary: a preliminary report, in Buitenhuis, H. & Uerpmann, H.-P. (ed.), Archaeozoology of the Near East II: 119–25. Leiden: Universal Book Services/Dr W. Backhuys. Google Scholar
Benecke, N. 1994. Der Mensch und seine Haustiere. Die Geschichte einer Jahrtausendalten Beziehung. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss Verlag.Google Scholar
Berger, M. & Thenius, E. 1951. Über römerzeitliche Kamelfunde im Stadtgebiet von Wien. Veröffentlichungen des Historisches Museums der Stadt Wien: 20–22.Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S. 1969. Representations of camels in a Hungarian medieval chronicle, Acta Agronomica Academiae Seien-Harum Hunguricae 18: 247–51.Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S. 1974. History of domestic mammals in Centrai and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S. 1989. Camel sacrifice in Roman Intercisa, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 41(1–4): 399–404.Google Scholar
Dahl, G. & Hjort., A. 1978. Having herds: pastoral economy and household growth. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
De Baldach, E. 1983. The four seasons of the house of Cerniti. Bicester: Facts On File Publications.Google Scholar
Driesch A, Von Den. 1976. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum. Bulletin 1.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, S. 1982. Camels, wagons and the Ottoman State in the 16th and 17th centuries, International journal of Middle Eastern Studies 14: 523–39.Google Scholar
Gautier, A. 1966. Camelus thomasi from the Northern Sudan and its bearing on the relationship C. thomasi-G. bactrianus, Journal of Paleontology 40(6):1368–72.Google Scholar
Henninger, J. 1948. Le sacrifice chez les Arabes, Ethnos 13:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hongo, H. 1994. Kaman Kalehöyük III, Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Center in Japan {Studies in Anatolian Archaeology III): 37–54.Google Scholar
Köhler, I. 1981. Zur Domestikation des Kamels. Dissertation, Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover.Google Scholar
Köhler-Rollefson, I. 1989. Zoological analysis of camel skeletons, in Smith, R. H. & Day, L. P. (ed.), Pella of the Decapolis 2: 142–63. Wooster (OH): College of Wooster.Google Scholar
Kubinyi, F. 1859. A teve és a 16, allât- és ôslénytani s a Magyar ok keletröl kijovetelére vonatkozólag torténelmi tekintetbon [The zoology and palaeontology of camel and horse with historical regard to the emigration of Hungarians from the East], Akadémiai Értesitâ 1(5):397–446.Google Scholar
Morales-Muñiz, A., Riquklme, J. A. & Lettow-Vorbeck, C. Liksau Von. 1995. Dromedaries in antiquity: Iberia and beyond, Antiquity 69: 368–75.Google Scholar
Pellat, C. 1934. Encyclopédie de l'Islam. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steiger, C. 1990. Vergleichend morphologische Untersuchungen an Einzulknochen des postkranialen Skeletts der Altwelt-kamole. Inaugural dissertation, institut fürPalaeoanatomie, Domestikationsforschung und Geschichte der Tiermedizin der Universität München.Google Scholar
Szilády, Z. 1930. A tevék torténeléuől [Fr om the history of camels], Természettudományi Közlöny 62(11-12): 347–56.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E. 1963. A history of domesticated animals. New York (NY): Harper & Row.Google Scholar