Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
The axe-hammer illustrated (pl. xviii b and fig. 1) was found by Mr. J. E. Best in 1944 on the surface of Fifield Down about one mile north-west of Fifield Bavant, south Wilts. Unfortunately for dating purposes it was not associated with other objects, but nevertheless is of great interest in that it is made of spotted dolerite or preselite from the Presely mountains, Pembrokeshire, and is of a type very rarely found in the southern lowlands. Fortunately, preselite is a rock easily identified macroscopically, and I am grateful to Dr. F. S. Wallis and the South-Western Sub-Committee for the Petrological Identification of Stone Implements for confirming the identification. In this instance it was agreed that slicing was unnecessary as the owner had expressed hesitancy in permitting the operation to be performed, and it was obvious that little purpose would be served by defacing so perfect a specimen for microscopic examination.
page 145 note 1 Wilts. LXX NW., lat. 51° 2′ 47″ N., long, I° 59′ 58″ W.
page 145 note 2 Kendrick, and Hawkes, , Archaeology in England and Wales (1932), p. 105Google Scholar.
page 145 note 3 Arch. Camb. (1935), xc, 267Google Scholar.
page 146 note 1 Arch. Camb. (1930), lxxxv, 407Google Scholar.
page 146 note 2 Ibid. (1935), xc, 278
page 146 note 3 National Museum of Wales, Guide to the Pre-history of Wales (1939), p. 172.
page 146 note 4 Antiquity (1936), x, 220Google Scholar.
page 147 note 1 Museums Journ. (1937), xxxvii, 295Google Scholar.
page 147 note 2 Proc. Prehist. Soc. (1947), xiii, 53Google Scholar.
page 147 note 3 Wilts. Arch. Mag. (1948), lii, 287Google Scholar.
page 147 note 4 Arch. Camb. (1935), xc, 189Google Scholar.
page 147 note 5 National Museum of Wales, Guide to the Prehistory of Wales (1939), p. 61.
page 147 note 6 Wilts. Arch. Mag. (1924), xlii, 431Google Scholar.
page 147 note 7 Both recent and unpublished identifications by the South-Western Sub-Committee.
page 147 note 8 British Museum, no. 1940, 7-1, 591; as yet unpublished.
page 147 note 9 Salisbury Museum, no. 1080; as yet unpublished.
page 147 note 10 Antiq. Journ. (1923), iii, 239Google Scholar.
page 147 note 11 Salisbury Museum, no. 4840; as yet unpublished.
page 147 note 12 Ibid., no. 4555A; as yet unpublished.
page 147 note 13 Antiq. Journ. (1923), iii, 252 noteGoogle Scholar.
page 147 note 14 Avebury Museum, no. W.H.F.S. 12; as yet unpublished.
page 148 note 1 Arch. Journ. (1947), civ, 16Google Scholar.
page 149 note 1 Antiquity (1931), v, 481Google Scholar.
page 149 note 2 Bransted, , Danmarks Oldtid, i, 64 and 111.Google Scholar
page 149 note 3 Childe, , Prehistory of Scotland (1935), 17Google Scholar.
page 149 note 4 Danmarks Oldtid, i, 55.
page 149 note 5 Proc. Prehist. Soc. (1938), iv, 91Google Scholar.
page 149 note 6 Mortimer, , Forty Years Researches, 23–42Google Scholar.
page 149 note 7 Bateman, , Vestiges, 41Google Scholar; Piggott, , Arch. Journ. lxxxviii, 131Google Scholar.
page 149 note 8 Arch. lxix, 6-8; lxxv, 103-4.
page 149 note 9 Antiq. Journ. (1921), i, 123Google Scholar.
page 149 note 10 Wilts. Arch. Mag. (1948), lii, 287Google Scholar.
page 149 note 11 Proc. Prehist. Soc. (1941), vii, 63Google Scholar.
page 150 note 1 Proc. Prehist. Soc. (1947), xiii, 49Google Scholar.
page 150 note 2 Penzance Museum; as yet unrecorded.
page 150 note 3 P.S.A.S. xxxvi, 100; Arch, lxxv, 104; Childe, , Prehistory of Scotland (1935), p. 70Google Scholar.
page 150 note 4 P.S.A.S. xxxvii, 77, fig. 2; lxv, 94, fig. 17.
page 150 note 5 R.C.A.M., Caithness, 1911, p. 176, no. 556; Prehistory of Scotland, pp. 69 ff.
page 150 note 6 Ibid., and Scotland before the Scots (1946), p. 38.
page 150 note 7 Wilts. Arch. Mag. (1948), lii, 287.Google Scholar
page 150 note 8 P.S.A.S. lxv, 91; lxxxi, 41.
page 150 note 9 Simpson, , The Province of Mar (1944), pl. 16Google Scholar.
page 150 note 10 Antiq. Journ. (1923), iii, 254Google Scholar.
page 151 note 1 Proc. Prehist. Soc. (1941), vii, 60Google Scholar.
page 151 note 2 Arch. Journ. (1947), civ, 14–15Google Scholar.
page 151 note 3 Antiq. Journ. (1923), iii, 245Google Scholar.