Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T00:07:02.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Whole Genome Sequencing for Investigation of Potential Hospital-Acquired Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2024

Petros Svoronos
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Shandra Day
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Nora Colburn
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Christina Liscynesky
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Christine Sun
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Michael Sovic
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Preeti Pancholi
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Shashanka Murthy
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Leama Ajaka
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a relatively new method for analyzing outbreaks and modes of transmission, particularly for multidrug resistant bacteria. This study sought to investigate clusters of patients with genetically related Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) bacteremia for shared hospital environmental exposures. Methods: All VRE blood culture isolates from patients from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 underwent Illumina WGS. Core single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified, and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed across the VRE isolates. Clusters were defined as isolates with 15 or fewer core genome SNPs and were investigated for potential transmission routes. For each cluster, patients were evaluated in the 12 weeks before and after the first VRE isolate for shared hospital environmental exposures (hospital unit, patient rooms, procedural rooms, and radiology suites). Hospital units were comprised of patient rooms located geographically together on the same floor of the hospital. Results: A total of 82 VRE isolates underwent WGS. Thirty-eight (46%) clustered genetically with at least one other isolate. Clusters included 2 to 15 patients per group and represented 10 distinct MLST subgroups (Figure 1). Nine hundred and thirty-nine hospital environmental exposures were identified across the 38 patients. For each cluster, there was a total of 341 (36.3%) shared exposures. Shared environmental exposures occurred in radiology suites (35, 38.5%), patient rooms (32, 35.6%) and procedural rooms (23, 25.6%). Of the patients who shared the same hospital unit, 10 (31.3%) had the same patient room with 7 (70%) of them being in the emergency department (ED). Overall, the ED represented 7 (21.9%) of the shared hospital units. Each cluster had at least one shared hospital environmental exposure found. Conclusions: Use of WGS can help investigate outbreak clusters of resistant organisms such as VRE. In this study, nearly half of all VRE blood isolates were able to be segregated into clusters with at least one other isolate. Although VRE colonization of hospital rooms is well described, patient rooms represented the smallest proportion of shared hospital environmental exposures. This study thus suggests other environmental transmission routes such as radiology suites and procedural rooms warrant closer investigation.

Type
MRSA/VRE
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America