Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T14:22:40.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Integration of Language and Content Instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

George Spanos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 1980s were dynamic years for applied linguistic researchers and practitioners involved in the integration of language and content instruction. In addition to the publication of five stimulating texts devoted to the subject (Mohan 1986, Cantoni-Harvey 1987, Crandall 1987, Enright and McCloskey 1988, and Brinton, Snow, and Wesche 1989), there was increasing attention at all school levels to curriculum development, materials development, teacher training, evaluation, and assessment, Second and foreign language educators as well educators in the fields of mathematics, science, and social science have become cognizant of the relationship between language development and the acquisition of content-specific knowledge and skills.

Type
Language Pedagogy
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 10 , March 1989 , pp. 227 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

A language for life: Report of the committee of inquiry appointed by the secretary of state for education and science under the chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock F.B.A. 1975. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1989. Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U. and O'Malley, J. M.. 1987. The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL quarterly. 21.2.227–249.Google Scholar
Christian, D. et al. , In press. Combining language and content for second language students. In Padilla, A. M., Fairchild, H. H., and Valadez, C. M. (eds.) Innovations in language education. 2 vols. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications [Vol. 1: Bilingual education and English as a second language.]Google Scholar
Connolly, P. and Vilardi, T. (eds.) 1989. Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. (ed.) 1985. Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Crandall, J. A. et al. , 1989. English skills for algebra: Math-language activities for algebra students. 2 Vols. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. [Book 1: Tutor book and resource materials; Book 2: Student workbook.]Google Scholar
Cuevas, G. J. 1984. Mathematics learning in English as a second language. Journal for research in mathematics education. 15.2.134–144.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 1979. Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimal age, and some other matters. Working papers an bilingualism. 19.197–205.Google Scholar
Curtain, H. A. and Martinez, L. S.. 1989. Integrating the elementary school curriculum into the foreign language class: Hints for the FLES teacher. Los Angeles: Center for Language Education and Research, UCLA. [ERIC: ED 305 823.]Google Scholar
Curtain, H. A. and Pesola, C. A.. 1988. Languages and children: Making the match. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Early, M., Thew, C., and Wakefield, P.. 1986. ESL instruction via the regular curriculum: A framework and resource book. 2 Vols. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education. [Vol. 1: Theoretical framework and sample lessons; Vol. 2: Resources for integrating language and content instruction, K-12.]Google Scholar
Enright, S. D. and McCloskey, M. L.. 1988. Integrating English. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., Freeman, Y., and Gonzales, G.. 1987. Success for LEP students: The Sunnyside sheltered English program. TESOL quarterly. 21.2.361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. 1987. Learning through two languages: Strategies of immersion and bilingual education. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Graham, J. G. and Beardsley, R. S.. 1986. English for specific purposes: Content, language, and communication in a pharmacy course model. TESOL quarterly. 20.2.227–246.Google Scholar
Heald-Taylor, G. 1986. Whole language strategies for ESL students. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A.. 1987. English for sepcific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, C. and Quinn, M. E.. 1987. ESL and science learning. In Crandall, J. A. (ed.) ESL through content-area instruction. Englwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. 55–57.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. 1985. Input in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
B. L., Leaver and Stryker, S. B.. 1989. Content-based instruction for foreign language classrooms. Foreign language annals. 22.3.269–275.Google Scholar
Mestre, J. P. 1988. The role of language comprehension in mathematics and problem sloving. In Mestre, J. P. and Cocking, R. R. (eds.) Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 201–220.Google Scholar
Miami-Dade Community College. 1989. A training package for English Skills for Algebra. Miami, FL: Miami-Dade Community College. [Project funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, Grant No. G008730483.]Google Scholar
National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. 1987. Sheltered English: An approach to content area instruction for liminted-English-proficient students. Forum. 10.6.1,3.Google Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1989. Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Northcutt, L. and Watson, D.. 1986. S.E.T.: Sheltered English teaching handbook. Carlsbad, CA: Northcutt, Watson, Gonzalez.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A. 1985. Bilingualism through schooling: Cross-cultural education for minority and majority students. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B. and Klopfer, L. E. (eds.) 1989. Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Shih, M. 1986. Content-based approaches to teaching academic writing. TESOL quarterly. 20.4.617–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. E. 1987. Beyond conversation: Second language learners's acquisition of description and evaluation. In Lantolf, J. and Labarca, A. (eds.) Research in second language learning: Focus on the classroom. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 3–16.Google Scholar
Snow, M. A. and Brinton, D. M.. 1988. Content-based language instruction: Investigating the effectiveness of the adjunct model. TESOL quarterly. 22.4.553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, G. and Crandall, J. A.. In press. Language and problem solving: Some examples from math and science. In Padilla, A. M., Fairchild, H. H., and Valadez, C. M. (eds.) Innovations in language education. 2 vols. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications [Vol. 1: Bilingual education and English as a second language.]Google Scholar
Willets, K. (ed.) 1986. Integrating language and content instruction. Los angeles: Center for Language Education and Research, UCLA. [ERIC ED278262.]Google Scholar