Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:23:22.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiences of International Language Teachers at a Turkish University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2018

Hasibe Kahraman  and
Ashleigh Pipes
Hasibe Kahraman
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical [email protected]
Ashleigh Pipes
Affiliation:
Middle East Technical [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a multiple case study approach, this short research article describes the experiences of three teachers (of German, French, and Korean) in a Turkish university where English is also mandatorily taught. Three themes common to the participants’ experiences emerged: use of the Turkish language, integrative adaptability, and international self-awareness. We suggest that understanding these themes may help teachers, students, and administrators better understand the rich and potentially unique fonts of knowledge that international teachers could bring into Turkish language classrooms in a university context.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 38 , September 2018 , pp. 209 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The experiment in this article earned an Open Materials badge for transparent practices. The materials are available at https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york%3a935338&ref=search and https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york%3a935337&ref=search

References

REFERENCES

Alptekin, C., & Alptekin, M. (1990). The question of culture: EFL teaching in non-English-speaking countries. In Rosner, R. & Bolitho, R. (Eds.), Currents of change in English language teaching (pp. 21–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aneja, G. A. (2016). (Non)native speakered: Rethinking (Non)nativeness and teacher identity in TESOL teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 572–596.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (2), 185–209.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: myth and reality. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2004). The native speaker in applied linguistics. In Davies, A. & Elder, C. (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 431–450). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Why the dichotomy “L1 versus LX user” is better than “native versus non-native speaker.” Applied Linguistics, 39 (2), 236–240.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2015). Transnationalism, multilingualism, and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 57–80.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. M. (2013). The ESL teacher as plurilingual: An Australian perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 446–471.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. M. (2016). “I may be a native speaker but I'm not monolingual”: Reimagining all teachers’ linguistic identities in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 597–630.Google Scholar
England, L., & Roberts, C. (1989, March). A survey of foreign students and MA-TESOL programs. Paper presented at the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Conference, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 306 754.)Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B., & Nelson, C. L. (1996). World Englishes. In McKay, S. L. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp.71–102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kontra, M. (1993). Communication interference and failure: A study of Hungarian Americanisms. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 101, 79–88.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization. Modern Language Journal, 98, 296–311.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Genung, P. (2002). I'd rather switch than fight: An activity theoretic study of power, success and failure in a foreign language classroom. In Kramsch, C. (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 175–196). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). What do students think about the pros and cons of having a native speaker teacher? In Llurda, E. (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 217–241). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
LoCastro, V. (1996). English language education in Japan. In Coleman, H. (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 40–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luk, J. C. M., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2007). Classroom interactions as cross-cultural encounters: Native speakers in EFL lessons. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Martínez Agudo, J. de D. (2017). Native and non-native teachers in English language classrooms: Professional challenges and teacher education. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2017). L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 (3), 459–492.Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Murahata, G., Murahata, Y., & Cook, V. (2016). Research questions and methodology of multi-competence. In Cook, V. & Wei, L. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence (pp. 26–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2010). Identity, literacy, and English language teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 28 (1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Norton, B., & De Costa, P. (2018). Research tasks on identity in language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 51 (1), 90–112.Google Scholar
Pacek, D. (2005). “Personality not nationality”: Foreign students’ perceptions of a non-native speaker lecturer of English at a British university. In Llurda, E. (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 243–262). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2003). “I never knew I was a bilingual”: Re-imagining teacher identities in TESOL. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2 (4), 251–268.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polio, C. (1994, March). International students in North American TESOL programs. Paper presented at the 28th TESOL Conference, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Wilson-Duffy, C. (1998). Teaching ESL in an unfamiliar context: International students in a North American MA TESOL practicum. TESOL Journal, 7 (4), 24–29.Google Scholar
Sali, P. (2014). An analysis of the teachers’ use of L1 in Turkish EFL classrooms. System, 42, 308–318.Google Scholar
Tsou, S. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2017). EFL college students’ perceptions toward native and non-native English speaking teachers. American Journal of Educational Research, 5 (12), 1182–1190.Google Scholar
Valdes, G. (1998). The construct of the near-native speaker in the foreign language profession: Perspectives on ideologies about language. ADFL Bulletin, 29 (3), 4–8.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar