Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:08:18.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A plan of capital injections based on the claims frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2018

Ran Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Jae-Kyung Woo*
Affiliation:
School of Risk and Actuarial Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Xixuan Han
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Hailiang Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
*
*Correspondence to: Jae-Kyung Woo, School of Risk and Actuarial Studies, University of New South Wales, Room 574, Level 5, East Wing, UNSW Business School building, Kensington Campus, UNSW, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. Tel: +61 2 9385 7559. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this work, we propose a capital injection strategy which is periodically implemented based on the number of claims in the classical Poisson risk model. Especially, capital injection decisions are made at a predetermined accumulated number of claim instants, if the surplus is lower than a minimum required level. There appears to be a similar problem found in reliability theory such that preventive maintenance policies are performed at certain shock numbers. Assuming a combination of exponentials for the claim severities, we first derive an explicit expression for the discounted density of the surplus level after a certain number of claims if ruin has not yet occurred. Utilising this result, we study the expected total discounted capital injection until the first ruin time. To solve the differential equation associated with this quantity, we analyse an extended Lundberg’s fundamental equation. Similarly, an expression for the Laplace transform of the time to ruin is also explicitly found. Finally, we illustrate the applicability of the present capital injection strategy and methodologies through various numerical examples. In particular, for exponential claim severities, some optimal capital injection strategy which minimises the expected capital spending per unit time is numerically studied.

Type
Paper
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecher, H., Cheung, E.C.K. & Thonhauser, S. (2011). Randomized observation periods for the compound poisson risk model: dividends. Astin Bulletin, 41(2), 645672.Google Scholar
Albrecher, H., Cheung, E.C.K. & Thonhauser, S. (2013). Randomized observation periods for the compound Poisson risk model: the discounted penalty function. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2013(6), 424452.Google Scholar
Albrecher, H. & Haas, S. (2011). Ruin theory with excess of loss reinsurance and reinstatements. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(20), 80318043.Google Scholar
Asmussen, S., Avram, F. & Usabel, M. (2002). Erlangian approximations for finite-horizon ruin probabilities. Astin Bulletin, 32(2), 267281.Google Scholar
Avanzi, B., Shen, J. & Wong, B. (2011). Optimal dividends and capital injections in the dual model with diffusion. Astin Bulletin, 41(2), 611644.Google Scholar
Bergel, A.I. & Egldio Dos Reis, A.D. (2015). Further developments in the Erlang (n) risk process. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2015(1), 3248.Google Scholar
Dickson, D.C. (2012). The joint distribution of the time to ruin and the number of claims until ruin in the classical risk model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50(3), 334337.Google Scholar
Dickson, D.C. & Waters, H.R. (2004). Some optimal dividends problems. Astin Bulletin, 34(1), 4974.Google Scholar
Dos Reis, A.D.E. (2002). How many claims does it take to get ruined and recovered? Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(2), 235248.Google Scholar
Dufresne, D. (2007). Fitting combinations of exponentials to probability distributions. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 23(1), 2348.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. & Schmidli, H. (2011a). Minimising expected discounted capital injections by reinsurance in a classical risk model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2011(3), 155176.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. & Schmidli, H. (2011b). Optimal control of capital injections by reinsurance with a constant rate of interest. Journal of Applied Probability, 48(3), 733748.Google Scholar
Klimenok, V. (2001). On the modification of Rouche’s theorem for the queueing theory problems. Queueing Systems, 38(4), 431434.Google Scholar
Kulenko, N. & Schmidli, H. (2008). Optimal dividend strategies in a Cramer-Lundberg model with capital injections. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 43(2), 270278.Google Scholar
Li, S. & Garrido, J. (2004). On ruin for the erlang (n) risk process. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 34(3), 391408.Google Scholar
Li, S. & Lu, Y. (2016). On the time and the number of claims when the surplus drops below a certain level. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2016(5), 420445.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. (2016). On the evaluation of expected penalties at claim instants that cause ruin in the classical risk model. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 18(1), 237255.Google Scholar
Mihálykó, E.O. & Mihálykó, C. (2011). Mathematical investigation of the Gerber-Shiu function in the case of dependent inter-claim time and claim size. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 48(3), 378383.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T. (2006). Maintenance Theory of Reliability. Springer Science & Business Media, London.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T. (2007). Shock and Damage Models in Reliability Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, London.Google Scholar
Nie, C., Dickson, D.C. & Li, S. (2011). Minimizing the ruin probability through capital injections. Annals of Actuarial Science, 5(2), 195209.Google Scholar
Nie, C., Dickson, D.C. & Li, S. (2015). The finite time ruin probability in a risk model with capital injections. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2015(4), 301318.Google Scholar
Pafumi, G. (1998). Discussion of “on the time value of ruin”. North American Actuarial Journal, 2(1), 7576.Google Scholar
Ramaswami, V., Woolford, D.G. & Stanford, D.A. (2008). The Erlangization method for Markovian fluid flows. Annals of Operations Research, 160(1), 215225.Google Scholar
Stanford, D. & Stroinski, K. (1994). Recursive methods for computing finite-time ruin probabilities for phase-distributed claim sizes. Astin Bulletin, 24(2), 235254.Google Scholar
Stanford, D.A., Avram, F., Badescu, A., Breuer, L., Soares, A.D.S. & Latouche, G. (2005). Phase-type approximations to finite-time ruin probabilities in the Sparre-Andersen and stationary renewal risk models. Astin Bulletin, 35(1), 131144.Google Scholar
Stanford, D.A., Stroinski, K.J. & Lee, K. (2000). Ruin probabilities based at claim instants for some non-poisson claim processes. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 26(2), 251267.Google Scholar
Stanford, D.A., Yu, K. & Ren, J. (2011). Erlangian approximation to finite time ruin probabilities in perturbed risk models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2011(1), 3858.Google Scholar
Yao, D., Yang, H. & Wang, R. (2011). Optimal dividend and capital injection problem in the dual model with proportional and fixed transaction costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(3), 568576.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Cheung, E.C.K. & Yang, H. (2018). On the compound poisson risk model with periodic capital injections. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 48(1), 435477.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Wang, R., Yao, D. & Chen, P. (2015). Optimal dividends and capital injections in the dual model with a random time horizon. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 167(1), 272295.Google Scholar
Zhou, M. & Yuen, K.C. (2012). Optimal reinsurance and dividend for a diffusion model with capital injection: variance premium principle. Economic Modelling, 29(2), 198207.Google Scholar