Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:53:18.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed grazing systems of goats with cattle in tropical conditions: an alternative to improving animal production in the pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

S. d’Alexis ,
F. Periacarpin ,
F. Jackson  and
M. Boval
S. d’Alexis
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Domaine Duclos, 97170 Petit Bourg, GuadeloupeFrench West Indies France
F. Periacarpin
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Domaine Duclos, 97170 Petit Bourg, GuadeloupeFrench West Indies France
F. Jackson
Affiliation:
Parasitology Division, Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, EH26 0PZ, UK
M. Boval*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Domaine Duclos, 97170 Petit Bourg, GuadeloupeFrench West Indies France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Mixed grazing systems combining sheep and cattle have shown better growth performance for one or both species. This observation has been attributed to their complementary feeding behaviour and the reduced host infection by gastrointestinal nematodes. Less attention has been paid to mixed grazing systems combining goats and cattle. Here, continuously grazing goats mixed with cattle (M) were compared with control goats reared alone (C) under tropical conditions. The comparison was conducted with gastrointestinal nematode-infected (I) and non-infected (nI) goats. Thus, the four treatments were cattle with gastrointestinal nematode-infected goats (MI), gastrointestinal nematode-infected goats alone (CI), cattle with non-infected goats (MnI) and non-infected goats (CnI). Average daily gain (ADG, g/day) and grass production were measured for the four groups of animals (six goats and two heifers treated with MI or MnI) grazing for 3 months on 4 subplots. Monthly measurements were performed over 5-day periods. This pattern was replicated in space for a second set of four subplots and in time for six successive cohorts of animals (bands 1 to 6). The ADG of goats in mixed grazing conditions was higher than controls irrespective of the infection status (32.6 v. 18.4 g/day for MI v. CI; 44.2 v. 33.5 g/day for MnI v. CnI). Concomitantly, the average biomass was lower for mixed grazing animals compared with controls (174 v. 170 for MI and MnI; 235 v. 208 for CI and CnI, respectively), suggesting better use of the sward. For daily BW gain (g/kg DM), mixed grazing also yielded better results than the control (1.88 v. 0.52 g BW/kg DM per day for MI v. CI; 2.08 v. 1.47 g BW/kg DM per day for MnI and CnI). Mixed grazing of goats and heifers offers a promising alternative for increasing goat and overall animal production as well as improving the management of pastures.

Keywords

mixed grazingBWgoatagro-ecological managementtropical
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Special Issue 8: Agroecology: integrating animals in agroecosystems , August 2014 , pp. 1282 - 1289
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaye, AO, Allen, VG and Fontenot, JP 1994. Influence of grazing cattle and sheep together and separately on animal performance and forage quality. Journal of Animal Science 72, 1013–1022.Google Scholar
Agastin, A, Farant, A, Bocage, B, Godard, X and Naves, M 2010. Study of carcass characteristics of Creole cattle steers raised in two contrasting post weaning systems. Advances in Animal Biosciences 1, 508–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandre, G, Aumont, G, Fleury, J, Coppry, O, Mulciba, P and Nepos, A 1997. Semi-intensive production of meat goats in a tropical area – the case of Creole goats grazing on Digitaria decumbens in Guadeloupe. INRA Productions Animales 10, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, VG, Batello, C, Berretta, EJ, Hodgson, J, Kothmann, M, Li, X, McLvor, J, Milne, J, Morris, C, Peeters, A and Sanderson, M 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.Google Scholar
Altieri, MA, Funes-Monzote, FR and Petersen, P 2012. Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 1–13.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1997. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Aumont, G, Pouillot, R and Mandonnet, N 1997a. Le denombrement des elements parasitaires: Un outil pour l’etude de la resistance genetique aux endo-parasites chez les petits ruminants. In Workshop final de l’ATP CIRAD-MIPA 72/94, Guadeloupe (F.W.I.), France.Google Scholar
Aumont, G, Pouillot, R, Simon, R, Hostache, G, Varo, H and Barre, N 1997b. Intestinal parasitism of small ruminants in the French West Indies (French). INRA Productions Animales 10, 79–89.Google Scholar
Bambou, JC, de la Chevrotiere, C, Varo, H, Arquet, R, Kooyman, FNJ and Mandonnet, N 2008. Serum antibody responses in Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchus contortus . Veterinary Parasitology 158, 311–318.Google Scholar
Blaes, JL, Mandonnet, N, Arquet, R and Mahieu, M 2010. A long term experiment of integrated control of nematode parasitism in Creole goats. Advances in Animal Biosciences 1, 413–414.Google Scholar
Boval, M, Cruz, P, Ledet, JE, Coppry, O and Archimede, H 2002. Effect of nitrogen on intake and digestibility of a tropical grass grazed by Creole heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science 138, 73–84.Google Scholar
Brelin, B 1979. Mixed grazing with sheep and cattle compared with single grazing. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 113–120.Google Scholar
Bull, B, Fujimoto, K, Houwen, B, Klee, G, van Hove, L and van Assendelft, O 2003. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). Recommendations for “Surrogate Referece” method for the packed cell volume. Laboratory Hematology 9, 1–9.Google Scholar
Celaya, R, Olivan, M, Ferreira, LMM, Martinez, A, Garcia, U and Osoro, K 2007. Comparison of grazing behaviour, dietary overlap and performance in non-lactating domestic ruminants grazing on marginal heathland areas. Livestock Science 106, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, MA, Schwarm, S, Ortmann, W, Streich, J and Hummel, J 2007. A case of non-scaling in mammalian physiology? Body size, digestive capacity, food intake, and ingesta passage in mammalian herbivores. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology 148, 249–265.Google Scholar
d’Alexis, S, Sauvant, D and Boval, M 2013. Mixed grazing systems of sheep and cattle to improve live weight gain: a quantitative review. Journal of Agricultural Science, published online 18 September 2013, doi:10.1017/S0021859613000622, 12pp.Google Scholar
d’Alexis, S, Mahieu, M, Jackson, F and Boval, M 2012. Cross-infection between tropical goats and heifers with Haemonchus contortus . Veterinary Parasitology 184, 384–386.Google Scholar
do Canto, MW, Bona Filho, A, de Moraes, A, Hoeschl, AR and Gasparino, E 2009. Animal production in Tanzania grass swards fertilized with nitrogen. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 1176–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Jouven, M, Thomas, M and Tichit, M 2013. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. Animal 7, 1028–1043.Google Scholar
Dziba, LE, Scogings, PF, Gordon, IJ and Raats, JG 2003. The feeding height preferences of two goat breeds fed Grewia occidentalis L. (Tiliaceae) in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Ruminant Research 47, 31–38.Google Scholar
Fraser, MD, Vale, JE and Dhanoa, MS 2013. Alternative upland grazing systems: Impacts on livestock performance and sward characteristics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 175, 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, MD, Davies, DA, Vale, JE, Hirst, WM and Wright, IA 2007. Effects on animal performance and sward composition of mixed and sequential grazing of permanent pasture by cattle and sheep. Livestock Science 110, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetsch, AL, Gipson, TA, Askar, AR and Puchala, R 2010. Invited review: feeding behavior of goats. Journal of Animal Science 88, 361–373.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D and Bath, JG 1970. Performance of sheep and cattle grazed separately and together. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 10, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoste, H and Torres-Acosta, JFJ 2011. Non chemical control of helminths in ruminants: adapting solutions for changing worms in a changing world. Veterinary Parasitology 180, 144–154.Google Scholar
Humphreys, LR 1991. Tropical pasture utilisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Illius, AW and Gordon, IJ 1992. Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions. Oecologia 89, 428–434.Google Scholar
Jackson, F and Coop, RL 2000. The development of anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes. Parasitology 120, S95–S107.Google Scholar
Lacroux, C, Nguyen, THC, Andreoletti, O, Prevot, F, Grisez, C, Bergeaud, JP, Gruner, L, Brunel, JC, Francoise, D, Dorchies, P and Jacquiet, P 2006. Haemonchus contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) infection in lambs elicits an unequivocal Th-2 immune response. Veterinary Research 37, 607–622.Google Scholar
Leng, RA 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of 'poor-quality' forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3, 277–303.Google Scholar
Mahieu, M and Naves, M 2008. Incidence of Toxocara vitulorum in Creole calves of Guadeloupe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandonnet, N, Aumont, G, Fleury, J, Arquet, R, Varo, H, Gruner, L, Bouix, J and Khang, JVT 2001. Assessment of genetic variability of resistance to gastrointestinal nematode parasites in Creole goats in the humid tropics. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1706–1712.Google Scholar
Marley, CL, Fraser, MD, Davies, DA, Rees, ME, Vale, JE and Forbes, AB 2006. The effect of mixed or sequential grazing of cattle and sheep on the faecal egg counts and growth rates of weaned lambs when treated with anthelmintics. Veterinary Parasitology 142, 134–141.Google Scholar
Marshall, R, Gebrelul, S, Gray, L and Ghebreiyessus, Y 2012. Mixed species grazing of cattle and goats on Gastrointestinal infections of Haemonchus contortus . American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 7, 61–66.Google Scholar
Michell, P 1982. Value of a rising-plate meter for estimating herbage mass of grazed perennial ryegrass-white clover swards. Grass Forage Sciences 37, 81–87.Google Scholar
Nolan, T and Connolly, J 1977. Mixed stocking by sheep and steers – a review. Herbage Abstracts 47, 367–374.Google Scholar
Nolan, T and Connolly, J 1989. Mixed v. mono-grazing by steers and sheep. Animal Production 48, 519–533.Google Scholar
Over, HJ, Jansen, J and Olm, PW 1992. Distribution and impact of helminth diseases of livestock in developing countries (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. FAO, Rome, Italy. vii+221 pp.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, ELD, Hernandez, JA, Zanella, EL, Mizubuti, IY, da Silva, LDF and Reeves, JJ 2008. Performance and carcass characteristics of different genetic groups of steers. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia 37, 1669–1673.Google Scholar
Robertson, JB and Van Soest, PJ 1981. The detergent system of analysis. In The analysis of dietary fibre in food (ed. WPT James and O Theander), pp. 123–158. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Rutter, SM 2010. Review: grazing preferences in sheep and cattle: implications for production, the environment and animal welfare. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90, 285–293.Google Scholar
SAS 2010. SAS 9.2 Language reference: concepts, second edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sehested, J, Soegaard, K, Danielsen, V, Roepstorff, A and Monrad, J 2004. Grazing with heifers and sows alone or mixed: herbage quality, sward structure and animal weight gain. Livestock Production Science 88, 223–238.Google Scholar
Svensson, C, Hessle, A and Hoglund, J 2000. Parasite control methods in organic and conventional dairy herds in Sweden. Livestock Production Science 66, 57–69.Google Scholar
Torres-Acosta, JFJ and Hoste, H 2008. Alternative or improved methods to limit gastro-intestinal parasitism in grazing sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 77, 159–173.Google Scholar
Urquhart, GM, Armour, J, Duncan, JL, Dunn, AM and Jennings, FW 1988. Veterinary parasitology. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietery fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Waller, PJ 2006. Sustainable nematode parasite control strategies for ruminant livestock by grazing management and biological control. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 277–289.Google Scholar
Zeeman, PJL, Marais, PG and Coetsee, MJ 1983. Nutrient selection by cattle, goats and sheep on natural karoo pasture. 1. Digestibility of organic-matter. South African Journal of Animal Science 13, 236–239.Google Scholar