Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:04:05.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of animal density on cattle nutrition in dry Mediterranean rangelands: a faecal near-IR spectroscopy-aided study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

S. Y. Landau ,
L. Dvash ,
Y. Yehuda ,
H. Muklada ,
G. Peleg ,
Z. Henkin ,
H. Voet  and
E. D. Ungar
S. Y. Landau*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
L. Dvash
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Y. Yehuda
Affiliation:
Northern R&D, PO Box 831, Kiryat Shmona 11016Israel
H. Muklada
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
G. Peleg
Affiliation:
Cattle Division, Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Bet Dagan 50250Israel
Z. Henkin
Affiliation:
Beef Cattle Section, Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe-Ya’ar Research Center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095Israel
H. Voet
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Economics and Management, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Institute for Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
E. D. Ungar
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Plant Sciences, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the context of determining the sustainable carrying capacity of dry-Mediterranean herbaceous rangelands, we examined the effect of animal density on cattle nutrition, which is fundamental to animal performance and welfare. The effects on dietary components of low (0.56 cows/ha; L) and high (1.11 cows/ha; H) animal densities were monitored for three consecutive years in grazing beef cows. In the dry season (summer and early autumn), cows had free access to N-rich poultry litter (PL) given as a dietary supplement. In each season, near-IR spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to predict the chemical composition of herbage samples (ash, NDF, CP, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and metabolizable energy (ME) content from IVDMD). Near-IR spectroscopy was applied also to faecal samples to determine the chemical composition of the diet selected by the animal, as well as the contents of ash, NDF and CP in the faeces themselves. A faecal-NIRS equation was applied to estimate the dietary proportion of PL. Seasonal categories were green, dry without PL supplementation and dry with it. We found no effects of animal density on nutrition during the green season but effects were apparent when cows consumed dry pasture. Ash content predicted by faecal NIRS was higher in the diet than in plant samples clipped from pasture, which infers that cows ingested soil. Dietary and faecal ash contents were higher (P<0.05) at the H, implying greater soil intake in these animals. During the dry period, dietary contents of ME were higher in L than in H (P<0.05). Poultry litter supplementation was associated with a marked increase (P<0.01) in dietary and faecal CP contents. Poultry litter represented 0.45 and 0.59 of the diet in treatments L and H, respectively (P<0.05). Consequently, treatment H had higher faecal protein (P<0.05). A tendency of higher dietary protein (P=0.08) and lower dietary NDF (P=0.10) in treatment H was probably related to greater PL ingestion. Given that high and sustained rates of poultry litter consumption are detrimental to animal health, the above results cast doubts on the long-term sustainability of the higher of the animal densities tested. Although it may be sustainable vis-à-vis the vegetation, treatment H may have exceeded the boundaries of what is acceptable for cow health. Chemical information revealed with NIRS can be used to evaluate whether animal densities are compatible with animal health and welfare standards and can play a role in determining the carrying capacity of Mediterranean rangelands.

Keywords

animal densitybeef cattlenear-IR spectroscopycarrying capacitypoultry litter
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , February 2018 , pp. 265 - 274
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, Y, Brosh, A, Orlov, A, Shargal, E and Gutman, M 2004. Measurements of energy balance of grazing beef cows on Mediterranean pasture, the effects of stocking rate and season: 1. Digesta kinetics, faecal output and digestible dry matter intake. Livestock Production Science 90, 89–100.Google Scholar
Brosh, A, Aharoni, Y, Shargal, E, Sharir, B, Gutman, M and Choshniak, I 2004. Energy balance of grazing beef cattle in Mediterranean pasture, the effects of stocking rate and season: 2. Energy expenditure as estimated from heart rate and oxygen consumption, and energy balance. Livestock Production Science 90, 101–115.Google Scholar
Canfield, RW, Sniffen, CJ and Butler, WR 1990. Effects of excess degradable protein on postpartum reproduction and energy balance in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 2342–2349.Google Scholar
Eiteman, MA, Gordillo, RM and Cabrera, ML 1994. Analysis of oxonic acid, uric acid, creatine, allantoin, xanthine and hypoxanthine in poultry litter by reverse phase HPLC. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry 348, 680–683.Google Scholar
Fries, GF, Marrow, GS and Snow, PA 1982. Soil ingestion by dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 611–618.Google Scholar
Goley, PB 1961. Energy of ecological materials. Ecology 42, 581–584.Google Scholar
Golodets, C, Sternberg, M, Kigel, J, Boeken, B, Henkin, Z, Seligman, NG and Ungar, ED 2013. From desert to Mediterranean rangelands: will increasing drought and inter-annual rainfall variability affect herbaceous annual primary productivity? Climatic Change 119, 785–798.Google Scholar
Healy, WB 1968. Ingestion of soil by dairy cows. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 487–499.Google Scholar
Healy, WB, Cutress, TW and Michie, C 1967. Wear of sheep’s teeth: IV. Reduction of soil ingestion and tooth wear by supplementary feeding. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 201–209.Google Scholar
Henkin, Z, Ungar, ED, Dvash, L, Perevolotsky, A, Yehuda, Y, Sternberg, M, Voet, H and Landau, SY 2011. Effects of cattle grazing on herbage quality in an herbaceous Mediterranean rangeland. Grass and Forage Science 66, 516–525.Google Scholar
Henkin, Z, Ungar, ED, Perevolotsky, A, Gutman, M, Yehuda, Y, Dolev, A, Landau, SY, Sternberg, M and Seligman, NG 2015. Long-term trade-offs between herbage growth, animal production and supplementary feeding in heavily grazed Mediterranean grasslands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68, 332–340.Google Scholar
Israel Council on Animal Care Guidelines 1994. Israel Council on Animal Care Guidelines: legislation on animal welfare (defending animal rights) (Paragraph 14. Knesset Law Pub., Jerusalem, Israel. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
INRA 1989. Energy: the feed unit systems. In Ruminant nutrition: recommended allowances and feed tables (ed. R Jarrige), p. 28. INRA Publications, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Ketelaars JJMH, Tolkamp BJ 1992. Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants 1. Causes of differences in voluntary feed intake: critique of current views. Livestock Production Science 30, 269–296.Google Scholar
Kilgour, RJ 2012. In pursuit of ‘normal’: a review of the behaviour of cattle at pasture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138, 1–11.Google Scholar
Landau, SY, Dvash, L, Roudman, M, Muklada, H, Barkai, D, Yehuda, Y and Ungar, ED 2016. Faecal near-infrared spectroscopy to determine the nutritional value of diets consumed by beef cattle in east Mediterranean rangelands. Animal 10, 192–202.Google Scholar
Ludwig, TG, Healy, WB and Cutress, TW 1966. Wear of sheep’s teeth. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 157–164.Google Scholar
Mayland, HF, Florence, AR, Rosenau, RC, Lazar, VA and Turner, HA 1975. Soil ingestion by cattle on semiarid range as reflected by titanium analysis of feces. Journal of Range Management 28, 448–452.Google Scholar
NRC 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th revised edition. p.3 National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N and Gutman, M 1992. Interrelationships between lack of shading shelter and poultry litter supplementation: food intake, live weight, water metabolism and embryo loss in beef cows grazing dry Mediterranean pasture. Animal Production 55, 371–376.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N and Tiomkin, D 1992. Toxicity induced by poultry litter consumption: effect on measurements reflecting liver function in beef cows. Animal Production 54, 203–209.Google Scholar
Sternberg, M, Golodets, C, Gutman, M, Perevolotsky, A, Ungar, ED, Kigel, J and Henkin, Z 2015. Testing the limits of resistance: a 19‐year study of Mediterranean grassland response to grazing regimes. Global Change Biology 21, 1939–1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suttle, NF 2010. Mineral nutrition of livestock. Cabi, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Tilley, JM, Terry, RA 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.Google Scholar
Vavra, M, Rice, RW and Bement, RE 1973. Chemical composition of the diet, intake and gain of yearling cattle on different grazing intensities. Journal of Animal Science 36, 411–414.Google Scholar
Villalba JJ, Provenza FD 2007. Self-medication and homeostatic behaviour in herbivores: learning about the benefits of nature’s pharmacy. Animal 1, 1360–1370.Google Scholar
Walker, JW, Heitschmidt, RK, De Moraes, EA, Kothmann, MM and Dowhower, SL 1989b. Quality and botanical composition of cattle diets under rotational and continuous grazing treatments. Journal of Range Management 42, 239–242.Google Scholar
Walker, JW, Heitschmidt, RK and Dowhower, SL 1989a. Some effects of a rotational grazing treatment on cattle preference for plant communities. Journal of Range Management 42, 43–48.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Landau supplementary material

Landau supplementary material

Download Landau supplementary material(File)
File 37.5 KB