Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:26:07.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The value of feather meal as a protein supplement for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. S. Barber
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
A. G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Zena D. Hosking
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
K. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
Get access

Summary

The results of a nitrogen balance experiment with growing pigs have shown that 5 % feather meal was inferior to 7 % white-fish meal, when both supplements supplied the same amount of total crude protein in a barleyweatings- minerals-vitamins ration.

A comparative feeding trial in which white-fish meal was partially replaced by feather meal in the diets given to growing pigs gave inconclusive results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albanese, A. A., Frankston, J. E., & Irby, V., 1944. The estimation of methionine in protein hydrolysates and human urine. J. biol. Chem., 156:293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M. M., Barber, R. S., Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1963. A metabolic crate and harness suitable for male growing pigs up to bacon weight. J. Anim. Techns Ass., 14: 103.Google Scholar
Braude, R., & Mitchell, K. G., 1951. Potatoes for fattening pigs. Comparison of cooked and raw potatoes. Agriculture, Lond., 57: 501.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., 1960. The estimation of the available lysine in animal protein foods. Biochem. J., 77: 604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combs, G. E., Alsmeyer, W. L., & Wallace, H. D., 1958. Feather meal as a source of protein for growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E., 1962. A microbiological method for assessing the nutritional value of proteins. 2. The measurement of ‘available’ methionine, leucine, isoleucine, arginine, histidine, tryptophan and valine. Brit. J. Nutr., 16:409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerry, R. W., 1956. The use of poultry by-products in poultry rations. Poult. Sci., 35: 1144.Google Scholar
Gregory, B. R., Wilder, O. H. M., & Ostby, P. C., 1956. Studies on the amino acid and vitamin composition of feather meal. Poult. Sci., 35: 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttridge, D. G. A., 1959. Feather meal in poultry nutrition—a review. J. Inst. Corn agric. Merch., 7 (1): 44.Google Scholar
Hall, O. G., 1957. Value of feather meal with and without amino acid supplementation for growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 16:1076.Google Scholar
Naber, E. C., Touchburn, S. P., Barnett, B. D., & Morgan, C. L., 1961. Effect of processing methods and amino acid supplementation on dietary utilisation of feather meal protein by chicks. Poult. Sci., 40: 1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council, 1959. Joint United States-Canadian Tables of Feed Composition, Publ. no. 659.Google Scholar
Spackman, D. M., Stein, W. H., & Moore, S., 1958. Automatic recording apparatus for use in the chromatography of amino acids. Analyt. Chem., 30: 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, S. T. L., McKee, E. L., Andrews, G. P., Winslade, C. E., Steinhauser, R. L., & Windsor, H. A., 1963. The utilisation of hydrolised poultry feathers in isonitrogenous and isocalorie broiler rations. Poult. Sci., 42: 1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, O. H. M., Ostby, P. C., & Gregory, B. R., 1955. The use of chicken feather meal in feeds. Poult. Sci., 34: 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar