Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:43:06.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of station and field tests for the improvement of milking performance in dairy cattle. III. Breed differences in the yield of milk and butterfat from the fore and rear quarters of the udder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. M. Hinks
C. J. M. Hinks
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry, Rolighedsvej 25, Copenhagen, Denmark
Get access

Extract

The analysis was concerned with selective advantage as a possible cause of differences between breeds and individual animals in the relative proportions of milk obtained from the fore and rear quarters of the udder.

Danish Jersey cattle were found to yield a significantly higher proportion of milk from the fore quarters than Danish Red and Danish Black Pied cattle (47% ν. 45% and 44% respectively).

Very strong genetic relationships between the proportion of milk obtained from the fore quarters and lactation yields of milk and butterfat (rg = 0·92, 0·85) in the Jerseys, and correspondingly weak genetic relationships in the other two breeds, suggest that breed differences have arisen as a result of selection for productive performance operative upon different genetic relationships between production and the process controlling the partition of milk in the udder. It is suggested that differences between the breeds are likely to increase in the future.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 209 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adalberth, S. 1958. Preliminär redgörelse för fäaeltmässige afkommeundersökningar af semintjurar i Malmöhus län 1957–58. Malmöhus läns hushålln.-sällskaps kvartalsskrift, 260–269.Google Scholar
Allaire, F. R. and Henderson, C. R. 1966. Selection practised among dairy cows. I. Single lactation traits. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 1426–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohmen, F. 1955. Untersuchungen über die variable Milcherbigkeit der einzelnen Euterviertel bei den Töchtem verschiedener Vatertiere. Züchtungskunde 27: 158–164.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. 1960. Genetical aspects of maximum rate of flow during milking. J. Dairy Res. 27: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1966. Selection practices in dairy herds. I. First lactation performance and survival to the second lactation. Anim. Prod. 8: 467–480.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1968. The use of station and fleld tests for the improvement of milking performance in dairy cattle. I. Variation in milk yield and butterfat in test station records. Anim. Prod. 10: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M., Nielsen, E. O. and Neimann-Sørensen, A. 1968. The use of station and field tests for the improvement of milking performance in dairy cattle. II. Milking rate and time as indicators of a cow's milking ability. Anim. Prod. 10: 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. and Korkman, N. 1952. Heritability of the udder proportions in dairy cows. Hereditas 38: 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. and Ormiston, E. E. 1961. A comparison of scores and measurements of the udder proportions. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 950–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keestra, J. 1963. Melkbaarheidsunderzoek bij het zwartbonte vee in Friesland. Dissertation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Matthews, C. A., Swett, W. W. and Graves, R. R. 1941. Milk yields and milking rates of the individual quarters of the dairy cow udder. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. No. 827, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Venge, O. 1963. Investigations of milking characteristics in Swedish Red and White cattle. Lantbrks. Hösk. Ann. 29: 187–214.Google Scholar
Voigtländer, K.-H. 1966. [The composition of milk from individual udder quarters]. Arch. Tierz. 9: 213–221.Google Scholar