Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:29:45.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The performance of crosses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle for milk production in the coastal region of Tanganyika

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. Mahadevan
Affiliation:
Makerere University College, Kampala, Uganda
H. G. Hutchison
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanganyika
Get access

Extract

A study has been made of the performance of crosses and backcrosses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle using records covering a period of 15 years from the Experimental Station, Tanga. The gene combinations found in ½-bred animals were the most productive in this environment, and ¼-bred Bos taurus animals gave higher average daily yields of milk between calvings than those with ¾ taurus blood.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brumby, P. J., 1961. The causes of differences in production between dairy herds. Anim. Prod., 3: 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecky, T. P., 1950. Cattle breeding in Jamaica. Conference on the improvement of livestock under tropical conditions, December, 1950, Edinburgh, 5 pp. (Mimeograph.)Google Scholar
Mahadevan, P., Galukande, E. B. & Black, J. G., 1962. A genetic study of the Sahiwal grading-up scheme in Kenya. Anim. Prod., 4: 337.Google Scholar
Stonaker, H. H., Agarwala, O. P. & Sundaresan, D., 1953. Production characteristics of crossbred, backcross, and purebred Red Sindhi cattle in the Gangetic plains region. J. Dairy Sci., 36: 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tandon, O. B., 1951. Differences in milk production and in age at first calving among Indian and crossbred dairy cattle in India. Ph.D. Thesis No. 1195, Iowa State Coll., Ames, Ia.Google Scholar