Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:50:18.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the prediction of carcass composition in beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. E. Hinks  and
J. H. D. Prescott
C. E. Hinks
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
J. H. D. Prescott
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access

Summary

Selected sample joints from the right sides of twelve 18-month-old Friesian steers were used to compare their accuracy in predicting carcass composition. Results indicated that whilst the shin joint proved the more accurate predictor of carcass muscle and bone contents, the loin (ribs 11 to 13) or foreloin (ribs 9 to 10) proved more useful in predicting total carcass composition, provided carcass weight was included as an additional variate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 115 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adam, J. L. and Smith, W. C. 1966. The use of sample joints in predicting the composition of the pig carcass. Anim. Prod. 8: 85–94.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1963. Estimation of carcass composition: the anatomical approach. In Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.) C.S.I.R.O., Melbourne.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. A. and O'Carroll, F. M. 1964. Differences between left and right sides of lamb carcasses. Ir. J. agric. Res. 3: 223–237.Google Scholar
Cole, J. W., Orme, L. E. and Kincaid, C. M. 1960. Relationships of loin eye area, separable lean of various beef cuts and carcass measurements to total carcass lean in beef. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, O. G., and Howe, P. E. 1946. Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 926.Google Scholar
Harrington, G. 1963. Separation of technical errors and biological variation and other statistical problems arising in body composition studies. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 110: 642–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrington, G. and King, J. W. B. 1963. A note on the prediction of muscular tissue weight in sides of beef. Anim. Prod. 5: 327–328.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. E. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1972. An evaluation of beef carcass quality. 1. The influence of cereal feeding on the growth and carcass quality of Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 15: 215–227.Google Scholar
Preston, R. and Gee, I. 1957. Effect of hexoestrol on carcass composition and efficiency of food utilisation in fattening lambs. Nature, Lond. 179: 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D., 1970. Beef production from grazing and silage with autumn born calves. 2. The effects on the performance of cattle fed on silage of barley supplementation and of previous grazing. Anim. Prod. 12: 443–450.Google Scholar