Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:40:19.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farm animal cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. J. Nicol
C. J. Nicol
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Longford House, Longford, Bristol BS18 7DU
Get access

Abstract

Although there may be task-specific differences in performance between wild and domestic animals, there is no evidence for any generally reduced cognitive capacity in domestic animals. It is not possible to compare intelligence between species or breeds without recognizing the contribution of differences in attention and motivation, and domestic animals often perform better on learning tasks than wild animals because they are less fearful. Considerable flexibility and complexity in behaviour can arise from context-specific decisions that may not require learning. Examples include alarm calling and maternal behaviour in chickens. However, the majority of intelligent behaviour shown by farm animals is dominated by learned associations, sometimes in response to remarkably subtle cues. Seemingly straightforward learning abilities may result in surprising emergent properties. An understanding of these properties may enable us to investigate how farm animals interact socially, and whether they form concepts. Other abilities, such as imitation and the re-organization of spatial information, do not appear to depend on associative learning. The study offarm animal cognition tells us little about the issue of animal consciousness but, none the less, plays an important role in the animal welfare debate. The types of cognitive abilities animals have provide clues as to the types of situations in which (given the benefit of the doubt) they might suffer.

Keywords

cognition
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 375 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, M. C. 1993. Should cages for laying hens be banned or modified? Animal Welfare 2:67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arave, C. W., Lamb, R. C., Arambell, M. J., Purcell, D. and Walters, J. L. 1992. Behavior and maze learning ability of dairy calves as influenced by housing, sex and sire. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33:149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. W., Rittenhouse, L. R., Hart, R. H. and Richards, R. W. 1989. Characteristics of spatial memory in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23:331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. A. 1981. Shape discrimination in sheep and calves. Animal Behaviour 29:830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeman, N. E. and Friend, T. H. 1986. Visual discrimination at varying distances in Spanish goats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16:279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boice, R. 1973. Domestication. Psychological Bulletin 80:215–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissy, A. and Le Neindre, P. 1990. Social influences on the reactivity of heifers: implications for learning abilities in operant conditioning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25: 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R. H. and Dawkins, M. S. 1993. Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Behavioural Processes 28:165–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. W. 1993. A formal notation to aid analysis of complex behaviour: understanding the tactical deception of primates. Behaviour 127:231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapuis, N. and Varlet, C. 1987. Short cuts by dogs in natural surroundings. Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology 35B:213–219.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. J. and Appleby, M. C. 1995. Nesting behaviour of hens: effects of experience on motivation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42:283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couvillon, P. A. and Bitterman, M. E. 1985. Effect of experience with a preferred food on consumatory responding for a less preferred food in goldfish. Animal Learning and Behavior 13:433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, L. P. 1942. Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. American journal of Psychology 15:467–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. 1993. Through our eyes only? The search for animal consciousness. W. H. Freeman, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. and Guilford, T. 1991. The corruption of honest signalling. Animal Behaviour 41:865–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I. J. H. and Petherick, J. C. 1991. The implication of cognitive processes for animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science 69:5017–5022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, I. J. H., Savory, C. J. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1978. Observations on the reproductive behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Applied Animal Ethology 4:29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. S., Evans, L. and Marler, P. 1993. On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system. Animal Behaviour 46:23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. S. and Marler, P. 1991. On video images as social stimuli in birds: audience effects on alarm calling. Animal Behaviour 41:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, H. 1980. Evolution of canine information-processing under conditions of natural and artificial selection. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 53:389–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, H. and Frank, M. G. 1982. Comparison of problem -solving performance in six-week-old wolves and dogs. Animal Behaviour 30:95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B. G., Manzig, L. A. and Field, R. M. 1986. Imitation learning in budgerigars: Dawson and Foss (1965) revisited. Behavioural Processes 13:191–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallistel, C. R. 1990. The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Gardner, L. 1945. Responses of sheep in a discrimination problem with variations of the position of the signal. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology 38:343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheusi, G., Bluthe, R.-M., Goodall, G. and Dantzer, R. 1994. Social and individual recognition in rodents: methodological aspects and neurobiological bases. Behavioural Processes 33:59–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, J. and Church, R. M. 1992. Comparison of variance and covariancc patterns in parallel and serial theories of timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 57:393–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, T. 1986. How do warning colours work? Conspicuousness may reduce recognition errors in experienced predators. Animal Behaviour 34:286–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S. C. 1989. Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 51:385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, S. D. 1995 Memory for objects and positions: delayed non-matching to sample in storing and non-storing tits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48B:179–191.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. 1990. Domestication: the decline of environmental appreciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., Cox, M. and Barnett, J. L. 1994. Stimulus generalisation: the inability of pigs to discriminate between humans on the basis of their previous handling experience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40:129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H. and Cable, C. 1976. Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2:285–302.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. 1993. Imitation, culture and cognition. Animal Behaviour 46:999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. M. 1994. Cues, convergence and a curmudgeon: a reply to Povinelli. Animal Behaviour 48:242–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. M. and Dawson, G. R. 1990. A demonstration of observational learning using a bidirectional control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 42B:59–71.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M., Dawson, G. R. and Nokes, T. 1992. Imitation in rats: initial responding and transfer evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45B:229–240.Google Scholar
Holland, P. C. and Straub, J. J. 1979. Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning, journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 5:65–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Honey, R. C., Bateson, P. and Horn, G. 1994. The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: an investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47B:83–104.Google Scholar
Horn, G. 1988. What can the bird brain tell us about thought without language? In Thought without language (ed. Weiskrantz, L.), pp. 279–304. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Houpt, K. A. 1991. Domestic animal behavior for veterinarians and animal scientists. 2nd edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R. E. and Jernigan, P. 1994. Golden hamsters recognize individuals, not just individual scents. Annual Behaviour 48:129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. B. 1994. Regular handling and the domestic chick's fear of huma n beings: generalisation of response. Applied Annual Behaviour Science 42:129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. 1953. Animals and men. Penguin Psychology Series, Penguin Books, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. M. 1994. Neurobiological correlates of visual and olfactory recognition in sheep. Behavioural Processes 33:89–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendrick, K. M. and Baldwin, B. A. 1986. The activity of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and zona incerta of the sheep responding to the sight or approach of food is modified by learning and satiety and reflects food preference. Brain Research 375:320–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilgour, R. 1981. Use of the Hebb-Williams closed-field test to study the learning ability of Jersey cows. Animal Behaviour 29:850–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R., Foster, T. M., Temple, W., Matthews, L. R. and Bremner, K. J. 1991. Operant technology applied to solving farm animal problems. An assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30:141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, S. E. G. 1984. In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In Animal cognition (ed. Roitblat, H. L., Bever, T. G. and Terrace, H. S.), pp.263–276. Hillsdale, N. J.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. S., James, W. S. and Anderson, O. D. 1934. The comparative physiology of the conditioned motor reflex based on experiments with the pig, dog, sheep, goat and rabbit. Comparative Psychology Monographs 11:1–89.Google Scholar
Lien, J. and Klopfer, F. D. 1978. Some relations between stereotyped suckling in piglets and exploratory behaviour and discrimination reversal learning in adult swine. Applied Animal Ethology 4:223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, D. 1989. Problems of animal behaviour, p. 58. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. J. 1987. From null hypothesis to null dogma. Behaviour and Brain Science 10:689–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPhail, E. M. 1987. The comparative psychology of intelligence. Behaviour and Brain Science 10:645–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L. R. and Ladewig, J. 1994. Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour 47:713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendl, M. and Laughlin, K. 1995. Pigs in space: memory in a delayed-matching to sample test. Proceedings of ASAB winter conference, London, p. 4.Google Scholar
Mountjoy, P. T. and Lewandowski, A. G. 1984. The dancing horse, a learned pig and muscle twitches. Psychological Record 34:25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munksgaard, L., de Passille, A. M., Rushen, J., Thodberg, K. and Jensen, M. B. 1995. The ability of dairy cows to distinguish between people. Proceedings of the 29th international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology (ed. Rutter, S. M., Rushen, J., Randle, H. D. and Eddison, J. C.), pp.19–20.Google Scholar
Nicol, C. J. 1995a. The social transmission of information and behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44:78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. 1995b. Cognition — a thoughtful approach to behaviour? Proceedings of the 29th international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology (ed. Rutter, S. M., Rushen, J., Randle, H. D. and Eddison, J. C.), pp.3–9.Google Scholar
Nicol, C. J. 1995c. Stimulus response. A video published by the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.Google Scholar
Nicol, C. J., Blakeborough, A. and Scott, G. B. 1991. The aversiveness of motion and noise to broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 32:243–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, C. J. and Guilford, T. 1991. Exploratory activity as a measure of motivation in deprived hens. Animal Behaviour 41:333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. and Pope, S. J. 1994. Social learning in sibling pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, C. J. and Pope, S. J. 1996. The maternal feeding display of domestic hens is sensitive to perceived chick error. Animal Behaviour In press.Google Scholar
Palameta, B. and Lefebvre, L. 1985. The social transmission of a food-finding technique in pigeons: what is learned? Animal Behaviour 33:892–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson-Kane, E., Nicol, C. J., Foster, J. M. and Temple, W. 1996. Limited perception of video images by domestic hens. Animal Behaviour In press.Google Scholar
Pepperberg, I. 1987. Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African grey parrot: labelling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75:37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherick, J. C. and Waddington, D. 1991. Can domestic fowl anticipate a period of food deprivation? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32:219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherick, J. C., Waddington, D. and Duncan, I. J. H. 1990. Learning to gain access to a foraging and dustbathing substrate by domestic fowl: is out of sight out of mind? Behavioural Processes 22:213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherick, J. C., Watson, G. M. and Duncan, I. J. H. 1990. Failure of domestic fowl to show contrast in learning: the implications for welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28:265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfungst, O. 1911. Clever Hans: the horse of Mr von Osten (Rahn, C. S., translator), Henry Holt and Company, New York. (Reprinted 1965, ed. R. Rosenthal; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, inc).Google Scholar
Poletaeva, I. I., Popova, N. V. and Romanova, L. G. 1993. Genetic aspects of animal reasoning. Behaviour Genetics 23:467–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poucet, B. 1993. Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review 100:163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. J., Nelson, K. E. and Boysen, S. T. 1990. Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology 104:203–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, E. O. 1984. Behavioural aspects of animal domestication. Quarterly Review of Biology 59:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G. and Zanforlin, M. 1995. Object and spatial representations in detour problems by chicks. Animal Behaviour 49:195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, J. P., Skoog, L. A. and Hirsch, J. 1987. Domestication and the behaviour-genetic analysis of captive populations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18:91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitblat, H. L. 1987. Introduction to comparative cognition. W. H. Freeman, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rushen, J. 1993. Exploration in the pig may not be endogenously motivated. Animal Behaviour 45:183–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C. M. 1994. Modified cages for laying hens. University Federation for Animal Welfare.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. 1972. Constraints on learning. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 4:1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibly, R. M. and McCleery, R. H. 1983. The distribution between feeding sites of herring gulls breeding at Walney Island, UK. Journal of Animal Ecology 52:51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidman, M., Wynne, C. K., Maguire, R. W. and Barnes, T. 1989. Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 52:261–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1989. The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48:419–425.Google Scholar
Wasserman, E. A., Devolder, C. L. and Coppage, D. J. 1992. Nonsimilarity based conceptualization in pigeons. Psychological Science 3:374–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F. 1993 Animal boredom: towards an empirical approach of animal subjectivity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. and Custance, D. 1995. Studies of imitation in chimpanzees and children. In Social learning: the roots of culture (ed. Heyes, C. M. and Galef, B. G.). Academic Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. B. and Kaplon, M. D. 1941. Effect of amount of reward and consummative activity on learning in chickens. Journal of Comparative Psychology 31:353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahorik, D. M., Houpt, K. A. and Swartzman-Andert, J. 1990. Taste aversion learning in three species of ruminants. Applied Animal Behazviour Science 26:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentall, T. R. and Urcuioli, P. J. 1993. Emergent relations in the formation of stimulus classes by pigeons. Psychological Record 43:795–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar