No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Estimation of milk fat, solids-not-fat and total solids production in zebu and their brown swiss crosses
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
The present study estimates the mean fat and solids-not-fat concentrations, and 305-day yields of fat, solids-not-fat, total solids and milk for three zebu breeds (Tharparkar, Sahiwal and Red Sindhi) and for halfbred F1 and F2 Brown Swiss ♂ × Sahiwal ♀ and ¾ Brown Swiss ♂ × Sahiwal 9 cattle maintained at this Institute during the period 1972–75. Mean fat and solids-not-fat concentrations ranged from 46·4 to 47·8 g/kg and 90·3 to 90·9 g/kg respectively, which were similar for all breeds. The 305-day fat, solids-not-fat, total solids and milk yields differed significantly between different breeds (P < 0–01). These yields were similar for the three zebu breeds (86 to 96 kg fat, 164 to 186 kg solids-not-fat, 250 to 282 kg total solids and 1 814 to 2 054 kg milk), but crossbreds showed significantly higher yields (125 to 171 kg, 242 to 332 kg, 368 to 503 kg and 2 670 to 3 676 kg, respectively), the highest being for F1 halfbreds. Season of calving had no significant effect on mean fat and solids-not-fat concentrations whereas the lactation yield parameters were found to be significantly higher for Tharparkar, Sahiwal and F1 Brown Swiss × Sahiwal cattle calving in the winter, followed in order by those calving in the monsoon and those calving in the summer. Selection of animals based on milk production alone was also found to increase the yield of milk constituents.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983
References
REFERENCES
Bailey, G. L. 1952. Studies on variations in the solids-not-fat content of milk. 1. Variations in lactation yield, milk fat percentage and SNF percentage that are due to the age of the cow. J. Dairy Res. 19: 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, K. P., Paul, T. M., Shroff, N. B. and Rahman, M. A. 1962. Composition of milk and ghee. ICAR Rep. Ser. No. 8, Krishi Bhaven, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. P., Freeman, A. E. and Spike, P. W. 1966. Variation in lactation yield of milk constituents. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 953–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards Institution. 1959. Density hydrometer for use in milk, Part 2. BS 734. British Standards Institution, London.Google Scholar
Chawla, D. S. and Mishra, R. R. 1976. Variation and inheritance of protein content in Karan Swiss (Brown Swiss cross), Sahiwal and Red Sindhi cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 46: 293–296.Google Scholar
Das, D. and Sharma, P. K. 1977. Studies on variation of certain milk constituents of purebred Jersey, Red Dane and indigenous cows in agro-climatic condition of Assam. Indian vet. J. 54: 167–174.Google Scholar
Gacula, M. C. Jr, Gaunt, S. N. and Damon, R. A. Jr 1968. Genetic and environmental parameters of milk constituents for five breeds. II. Some genetic parameters. J. Dairy Sci. 51: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaunt, S. N., Wilcox, C. J., Farthing, B. R. and Thompson, N. R. 1968. Genetic interrelationships of Holstein milk composition and yield. J. Dairy Sci. 51: 1396–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian Standards Institution. 1958. Determination of fat in whole milk, evaporated milk, separated milk, skim milk, butter milk and cream by the Gerber method. IS 1224. Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. 1974. [Effect of month of calving on milk yield and composition in first lactation of Polish Black-and-White Lowland cows in breeding herds in Poznan province.] Roczn. Akad. Roln. Poznan. 74: 51–61.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. 1950. The heritability of milk and butterfat yield. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 18: 1–12.Google Scholar
Koba, G. F. 1971. Variation in the milk and fat production of cows in relation to season of calving. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 39: 2971 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mihedov, N. T. 1971. Effect of weight and calving season on performance in Latvian Brown cows. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 39: 2991 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mirosj, V. V. 1971. Effect of season of birth on production in cows and its relation to progeny testing of sires. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 39: 13 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
National Dairy Research Institute. 1973. Dairy handbook. Nat. Dairy Res. Inst. Publ. No. 99, Karnal, Haryana.Google Scholar
Politiek, R. D. 1957. The influence of heredity and environment on the composition of the milk of Friesian cows and the practical possibility of selection for protein content. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 25: 1806 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Reinart, A. and Nesbitt, J. M. 1961. The Composition of Milk in Manitoba. Department of Dairy Science, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Rios Romero, G. 1975. Crossbreeding versus purebreeding effects on rate of growth and milk production in a Louisiana dairy herd. Diss. Abstr. Int. B. 36: 8 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Sadana, D. K. 1976. Genetic and environmental studies of butter fat percentage of Karan Swiss cows. M.Sc. Thesis, Nat. Dairy Res. Inst., Karnal.Google Scholar
Sargent, F. D., Butcher, K. R. and Legates, J. E. 1967. Environmental influences on milk constituents. J. Dairy Sci. 50: 177–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, K. C. and Ray, S. N. 1964. Nutritive values of Indian cattle feeds and the feeding of animals. Indian Council Agric. Res. Bull. No. 25.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Vankov, K. 1973. [Genetic characteristics of economically useful features of Bulgarian Red cattle. I. Variability and heritability of milk production.] Zhivotn. Nauki 10: 65–70.Google Scholar