Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:44:22.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of superovulation on fertilisation and embryonic survival in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. F. Hunter
R. H. F. Hunter
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry., University of Cambridge
Get access

Extract

1. Thirty-one gilts were injected subcutaneously with 1,500 i.u. PMS on Day 15 of the cycle, and inseminated on the morning of the 2nd day of oestrus.

2. Twenty of the animals were killed 1 to 4 days after insemination to study fertilisation, and the remaining eleven were killed on the 25th day of pregnancy to study embryonic survival.

3. All animals exhibited normal oestrous behaviour, only two of them failing to return to oestrus by Day 19 of the cycle. Treatment with PMS shortened the follicular phase of the cycle in nearly all instances.

4. Eighteen of the twenty animals in which eggs were studied were fertile and within these 84·2% of the eggs examined were undergoing normal development, 2·1% were fragmenting, 4·0% were polyspermic and 7·8% were primary oocytes. Ten unpenetrated secondary oocytes (1·9%) were also recovered.

5. Of the eleven animals in which embryonic survival was studied, only eight were pregnant at autopsy; the remaining three had 35 to 44 corpora albicantia, but no embryonic remains could be detected in the uterus.

6. The average ovulation rate in the eight pregnant animals was 35·4, with a range of 13 to 48. However, the average number of normal embryos was 17·0, with a range of 7 to 28.

7. The percentage survival of normal embryos varied from 26% to 83%. Embryonic survival was better at ovulation rates below that of the mean (35·4); an abnormally large or complete loss of embryos occurred at ovulation rates higher than 36.

8. Despite the range in percentage survival, the number of normal embryos found at the 25th day of pregnancy in five of the gilts was considerably above that found in untreated gilts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 457 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C. E., 1960. Prenatal mortality in the rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus. J. Reprod. Fertil., 1: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dziuk, P. J., & Dickmann, Z., 1965. Failure of the zona reaction in five pig eggs. Nature (Land.), 208: 502–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I., Williams, G., & Edwards, J., 1962. The use of serum gonadotrophin (PMS) in the induction of twin-pregnancy in the cow. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 59: 143–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. L., 1959. Polyspermy of pig ova. Anim. Prod., 1: 103–106.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L., 1961. Fertilisation in the pig. J. Reprod. Fertil., 2: 307–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanly, S., 1961. Prenatal mortality in farm animals. J. Reprod. Fertil., 2: 182–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, R. H. F., 1964. Superovulation and fertility in the pig. Anim. Prod., 6: 189–194.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. H. F., 1965. Studies on ovulation and fertility in the pig. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Longenecker, D. E., Lasley, J. F., & Day, B. N., 1965. Fecundity in gilts and sows administered PMS. J. Anim. Sci., 24: 924. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Melrose, D. R., & O'Hagan, C., 1961. Investigations into the techniques of insemination in the pig. Proc. IV. int. Congr. Anim. Reprod., Hague, 4: 855–859.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. S., 1943. Induction of superovulation and superfecundation in rabbits. J. Endocrin., 3: 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. S., 1954. Fecundity and embryonic mortality in pigs. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 2: 308–332.Google Scholar
Pitkjanen, I. G., 1955. Ovulation, fertilisation, and the early stages of embryonic development in pigs, Izv. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. Ser. Biol., 3: 120–131.Google Scholar
Polge, C., & Dziuk, P., 1965. Recovery of immature eggs penetrated by spermatozoa following induced ovulation in the pig. J. Reprod. Fertil., 9: 357–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J., 1951. The control of fertility in sheep. Part II. The augmentation of fertility by gonadotrophin treatment of the ewe in the normal breeding season. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 41: 6–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaldino, J. F., Berry, R. O., & Moffit, J. G., 1955. The maturation process of the ovum of swine during normal and induced ovulations. J. Anim. Sci., 14: 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, C., 1959. Analyse de la fécondation de l'oeuf de la truie après accouplement ou insémination artificielle. Ann. Zootech. (Paris), Ser. D. Suppl., p. 165–177.Google Scholar