Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:45:48.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of parenterally administered iron upon outdoor-reared piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Elizabeth A. Walker  and
J. H. Taylor
Elizabeth A. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Division, Cyanamid of Great Britain Ltd., Bush House, London, W.C.2
J. H. Taylor
Affiliation:
Agricultural Division, Cyanamid of Great Britain Ltd., Bush House, London, W.C.2
Get access

Summary

1. An experiment is described in which 194 pairs of piglets on 10 commercial farms were reared out of doors with access to soil, either on free range or in field pens. One piglet from each pair received 200 mg. of iron as a parenterally administered iron dextrin complex. The soil type and the iron content of the soil were determined on each farm.

2. During the first 8 weeks of life, the treated piglets showed a small but significant positive growth response of 1–2 lb. (3·0%). The response was greater (2·1 lb.) in piglets reared in field pens, but was non-significant in those reared on free range.

3. Differences in blood haemoglobin levels, mortality and the incidence of runt piglets were not significant.

4. Total body iron increased during the first 3 weeks of life by a mean of 339 mg., of which approximately 295 mg. appeared to be derived from the soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, J. S., & Felt, C., 1941. The iron content of cereals. Cereal Chem., 18: 819.Google Scholar
Bear, F. E., 1955. Chemistry of the Soil. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, p. 201.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. R., 1957. The Study of the Soil. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 4th edition, p. 115.Google Scholar
King, E. S., 1951. Microanalysis in Medical Biochemistry. J. & A. Churchill Ltd., London. 2nd edition, p. 33.Google Scholar
Linkenheimer, W. H., Patterson, E. L., Milstrey, R. A., Brockman, J. A., & Johnson, D. D., 1960. Preparation and biological testing of a parenteral iron preparation. J. Anim. Sci., 19: 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A., & Hatton, B., 1964. The effect of intramuscular iron injection on growth rates and haemoglobin levels of outdoor-reared piglets. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 23: xi.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M., & Lodge, G. A., 1961. The nutrition of the young pig. Tech. Comm. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr., no. 22, p. 85.Google Scholar
Swank, H. W., & Mellon, B. G., 1938. The determination of iron with mercaptoacetic acid. Industr. Engng Chem. (Anal.), 10: 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, O., 1934. Oxalate method in chemical examination of soils. Medd. Skogsforsoksanst. Stockh., 27: 1.Google Scholar
Walker, E. A., & Taylor, J. H., 1961. The effect of parenterally administered iron upon growth rate of piglets reared on concrete. Anim. Prod., 3: 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venn, J. A., McCance, R. A., & Widdowson, E. M., 1947. Iron metabolism in piglet anaemia. J. comp. Path. Ther., 57: 314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed