Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:47:17.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of change of the diet and feeding regimen at weaning on duodenal myoelectrical activity in piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

V. Lesniewsk ,
H. N. Lærke ,
M. S. Hedemann ,
S. Højsgaard ,
S. G. Pierzynowski  and
B. B. Jensen
V. Lesniewsk
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw Agricultural University, ul. Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
H. N. Lærke
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
M. S. Hedemann
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. Højsgaard
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Systems, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. G. Pierzynowski
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark R. and D. Gramineer International AB, Animal Physiology Department, IDEON, 223 70 Lund, Sweden
B. B. Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the change of diet and feeding regimen at weaning on myoelectrical activity of the intestine of piglets. For this purpose the electromyographic recordings of duodenal myoelectrical activity were carried out in relation to the different weaning status of piglets. Six piglets, in two experimental trials were surgically modified with two serosal, bipolar electrodes on the duodenum. The myoelectrical activity was recorded in the same piglets before weaning when they were sucking their sow and after weaning when the diet was changed to solid dry food (standard commercial concentrate for weaned pigs). In sucking piglets the intestinal myoelectrical activity pattern exhibited triple-phased migrating myoelectric complex (MMC), undisturbed by sow nursing. After weaning, feeding with solid food induced a long-term post-prandial pattern with higher frequency of electrical response activity (ERA) when compared with phase II of the MMC. The duration of the MMC cycles increased with time over the experiment by proportionately 0•11 and 0•14 in the periods before and after weaning. However, weaning significantly shortened MMC cycle duration by proportionately 0•21. The duration of phase II was significantly prolonged with time over the experiment by 0•07 to 0•10 and it was not affected by weaning. Phase III of MMC were of constant duration over the whole experimental period.

In summary, changes in the diet and feeding regimen have an influence on the characteristics of intestinal myoelectrical activity in piglets around weaning.

Keywords

duodenummyoelectrical activitypigletssow milk
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 443 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, P., Code, Ch. F. and Lambert, E. H. 1961. Motor and electric activity of the duodenum. American Journal of Physiology 201: 287—291.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Burke, J. 1998. Behaviour of sows and piglets during lactation. In The lactating sow (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Moughan, P. J. and Scharma, J. W.), pp. 301—338. Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bueno, L. and Fioramonti, J. 1993. In An illustrated guide to gastrointestinal motility (ed. Kumar, D. and Wingate, D.), pp. 130—143. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bueno, L. and Fioramonti, J. 1994. Neurohormonal control of intestinal transit. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 34: 513—525.Google Scholar
Bueno, L. and Ruckebusch, Y. 1976. The effect of feeding on the motility of the stomach and small intestine in the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 35: 397—405.Google Scholar
Bueno, L. and Ruckebusch, Y. 1978. Migrating myoelectrical complexes: disruption, enhancement and disorganisation. In Gastrointestinal motility in health and disease (ed. Duthie, H.), pp. 83—91. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster.Google Scholar
Bueno, L. and Ruckebusch, Y. 1979. Perinatal development of intestinal myoelectrical activity in dogs and sheep. American Journal of Physiology 6: E61—E67.Google Scholar
Burrows, C. F., Merritt, A. M. and Tash, J. 1986. Jejunal myoelectrical activity in the conscious neonatal pig. The Journal of Physiology 347: 349—357.Google Scholar
Code, C. F. and Marlett, J. A. 1975. The interdigestive myo-electric complex of the stomach and small bowel of dogs. The Journal of Physiology 246: 289—309.Google Scholar
Counsilman, J. J. and Lim, L. M. 1985. The definition of weaning. Animal Behaviour 33: 1023—1024.Google Scholar
Cranwell, P. D. 1995. Development of the neonatal gut and enzyme system. In The neonatal pig. Development and survival (ed. Varley, M. A.), pp. 99—154. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Danielsen, V. 1991. [Lysine for young pigs.] Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Denmark, communication no. 785.Google Scholar
Etienne, M., Dourmand, J. -Y. and Noblet, J. 1998. The influence of some sow and piglet characteristics and of environmental conditions on milk production. In The lactating sow (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Moughan, P. J. and Scharma, J. W.), pp. 285—299. Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Groner, J. I., Altschuler, S. M. and Ziegler, M. M. 1990. The newborn piglets: a model of neonatal gastrointestinal motility. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 25: 315—318.Google Scholar
Jensen, P. and Recén, B. 1989. When to wean — observation from free-ranging domestic piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 49—60.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Smyth, J. A. and MacCracken, K. J. 1990. Effect of creep feeding on structural and functional changes of the gut of early weaned pigs. Research in Veterinary Science 48: 350—356.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Smyth, J. A. and MacCracken, K. J. 1991. Digestive development in the early-weaned pig. II. Effect of level of food intake on digestive enzyme activity during the immediate post-weaning period. British Journal of Nutrition 65: 181—188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiela, P. 1996. Interdigestive role of some intestinal bioactive peptides in the regulation of pancreatic exocrine secretion and the MMC of the stomach and small intestine in piglets. Ph.D. thesis, Warsaw Agricultural University, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. and Roman, C. 1979. Activity of the gastro-intestinal musculature and movements of digesta. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 4: 347—353.Google Scholar
Leibbrandt, V. D., Ewan, R. C., Speer, V. C. and Zimmerman, R. 1975. Effect of weaning and age of weaning on baby pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 40: 1077—1080.Google Scholar
Miller, B. G., Newby, T. J., Stokes, C. R. and Bourne, F. J. 1984. Influence of diet on postweaning malabsorption and diarrhoea in the pig. Research in Veterinary Science 36: 187—193.Google Scholar
Pierzynowski, S. G., Weström, B. R., Svendsen, J. and Karlsson, B. W. 1990. Development of exocrine pancreas function in chronically cannulated pigs during 1-13 weeks of postnatal life. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 10: 206—212.Google Scholar
Rayner, V. and Wenham, G. 1986. Small intestine motility and transit by electromyography and radiology in the fasted and fed pig. The Journal of Physiology 379: 245—256.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. and Bueno, L. 1973. The effect of weaning on the motility of the small intestine in the calf. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 491—499.Google Scholar
Sarna, S., Northcott, P. and Belbeck, L. 1982. Mechanisms of cycling of migrating myoelectric complexes: effect of morphine. American Journal of Physiology 242: G588—G595.Google Scholar
Szabo, J. S. and Fewell, J. E. 1990. Small intestine myoelectrical activity in healthy neonatal piglets: effect of hyperosmolal formula. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 11: 101—108.Google Scholar
Szurszewski, J. H. 1987. Electrical basis of gastrointestinal motility. In Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract, second edition (ed. Johnson, L. R.), pp. 383—422. Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
Zabielski, R., Kiela, P., Lesniewska, V., Krzeminski, R., Mikolajczyk, M. and Barej, W. 1997. Kinetics of pancreatic juice secretion in relation to duodenal migrating myoelectric complex in preruminant and ruminant calves fed twice daily. British Journal of Nutrition 78: 427—442.Google Scholar
Zabielski, R., Lesniewska, V., Borlak, J., Gregory, P., Kiela, P., Pierzynowski, S. G. and Barej, W. 1998. Effects of intraduodenal administration of tarazepide on pancreatic secretion and duodenal EMG in neonatal calves. Regulatory Peptides 78: 113—123.Google Scholar
Zabielski, R. and Naruse, S. 1999. Neurohormonal regulation of the pancreas during postnatal development. In Biology of the pancreas (ed. Pierzynowski, S. G. and R., Zabielski), pp. 151—191. Elsevier Science B V, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zabielski, R., Terui, Y., Onaga, T., Mineo, H. and Kato, S. 1994. Plasma secretin fluctuates in phase with periodic pancreatic secretion and the duodenal migrating myoelectric complex in calves. Research in Veterinary Science 56: 332—337.Google Scholar