Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:32:49.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crossbred sheep production II. The repeatability of performance and the scope for culling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. C. Yalçin
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Maurice Bichard
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Get access

Extract

There are many flocks in Britain where first-cross ewes are mated with a Down ram in order to produce offspring of both sexes to be fattened for slaughter between 3 and 12 months of age. The ewes are normally bred out of hill ewes by rams of the special crossing breeds, the Border Leicester being the most popular example. Commonly the crossbred flock is maintained by the annual buying in of young sheep at 6 or 18 months old. These replace animals lost through normal wastage and those sold after a set number of lamb crops. In such a situation the flock owner relies on others to produce his crossbred ewes and can himself do nothing to improve their performance through selective breeding. He can only attempt to cull ewes with a poor performance. Any gains from such culling are, of course, temporary and must be maintained by a regular system of culling within each separate intake of females. The success of a culling scheme depends partly upon the extent to which future production is predictable from past performances. This is normally assessed by the correlation between an individual's successive records: the intra-class correlation or repeatability (t). The work reported here estimates the repeatability of various productive traits within two crossbred ewe flocks and considers the scope for culling within such flocks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnicoat, C. R., Murray, P. F., Roberts, E. M. & Wilson, G. S., 1956. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes, Parts V-XI. J. agric. Sci. 48: 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, D. C., 1962. Characters of economic importance in Welsh Mountain sheep Anim. Prod., 4: 269.Google Scholar
Desai, R. N. & Winters, L. M., 1951. The inheritance of fertility in sheep. Indian J. vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., 21: 191.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., 1941. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 8th ed.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Hansson, A., 1943. The sex ratio and multiple births in sheep. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 13: 35.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L., 1945. Animal Breeding Plans. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Ia. 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. & Dassat, P., 1954. Milk, meat, and wool production in the Langhe sheep of Italy. Z. Tierz. Züchtbiol., 62: 197.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F. & Roberts, R. C., 1959. The relationship of hogg weight to the subsequent performance of Scottish Blackface ewes. Anim. Prod., 1: 107.Google Scholar
Rendel, J., 1956. Heritabihty of multiple birth in sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 15: 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharafeldin, M. A., 1960. Factors affecting litter size in Texel sheep. Meded. Landb-Hogesch. Wageningen., 60 (3): 1.Google Scholar
Sidwell, G. M. & Grandstaff, J. O., 1949. Size of lambs at weaning as a permanent characteristic of Navajo ewes. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 373.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N., 1956. Measurement as an aid to selection in breeding sheep for wool production. Anim. Breed. Abstr., 24: 87.Google Scholar
Yalçin, B. C. & Bichard, M., 1964. Crossbred sheep production. I. Factors affecting production from the crossbred ewe flock. Anim. Prod., 6: 000.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, C. H. S., 1960. Comparison of estimates of repeatability and heritability for some production traits in Merino rams and ewes. I. Repeatability. Aust. J. agric. Res., 11: 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, A. A., 1956. Selection for fertility in the Romney Marsh sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar