Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:19:31.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of shape as a predictor of carcass composition in pigs from different breeding companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Kempster  and
D. G. Evans
A. J. Kempster
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
D. G. Evans
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Queensway House, Bletchley, Milton Keynes MK2 2EF
Get access

Abstract

Carcass data for a total of 1385 pigs from years 3 to 6 of the Meat and Livestock Commission's Commercial Pig Evaluation were used to examine the value of different shape assessments as predictors of carcass composition, when used in addition to carcass weight and fat thickness over the m. longissimus at the head of the last rib (P2). The sample comprised pigs from 13 breeding companies and a purebred Large White control.

The standard deviation of carcass lean proportion at equal weight and P2 was 24·5 g/kg. The addition of carcass length or visual conformation assessments (five-point scales) provided a small improvement in precision (minimum residual standard deviation = 24·2 g/kg). This improvement was associated with a reduction in the variation of lean to bone ratio.

The addition of an effect for breeding company to weight and P2 improved the precision substantially (residual standard deviation = 23·1 g/kg). The improvement was due mainly to the identification of differences in carcass fat content, there being a range of 30g/kg in carcass fat content between companies at equal weight and P2.

There was a further small improvement in precision from the addition of conformation assessments to weight, P2 and company (minimum residual standard deviation = 22·9 g/kg).

The study confirms earlier results which indicate that shape assessments are of limited value as predictors in the British pig population, due mainly to limited variation in lean to bone ratio. It also indicates that significant variation exists between companies in fat content at equal P2 and weight which is not explained by shape assessments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 313 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buck, S. F. 1963. A comparison of pigs slaughtered at three different weights. I. Carcass quality and performance. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60: 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission Of The European Communities. 1979. Development of uniform methods for pig carcass classification in the EC. Inf. Agric, No. 70. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. and Pease, A. H. R. 1968. The inter-relationships of various measurements, visual assessments and dissection results of pigs of 2001b live weight. Anim. Prod. 10: 249–255.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G. and Kempster, A. J. 1979. A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 2. Predictors for use in population studies and experiments. Anim. Prod. 28: 97–108.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. 1978. Variation and trends in the weight and fat thickness of commercial British pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 5: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Evans, D. G. 1979. A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 1. Predictors for use in commercial classification and grading. Anim. Prod. 28: 87–96.Google Scholar
Meat And Livestock Commission. 1980. Commercial Pig Evaluation: Management and Procedures. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar