Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:04:16.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk yield and milk composition of indigenous goats (Capra prisca) in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Zygoyiannis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaloniki, Greece
N. Katsaounis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four indigenous goats suckling either single (male or female) or twin kids were traditionally reared during a 32-week lactation period. During the suckling period of 12 weeks, milk production was estimated at 7-day intervals. During the milking period the goats were hand-milked twice daily and their milk production was measured at 4-week intervals. Milk samples were analysed for fat, protein, lactose, ash and dry matter concentration and solids-not-fat and energy concentration were calculated. During lactation, the goats were weighed at regular intervals and their body-condition score assessed at each weighing.

Goats with twins produced more milk than did those with singles during the suckling period but not after weaning. Peak yield occurred between the 10th and 11th week of lactation. Yield declined rapidly after weaning at 12 weeks and then decreased gradually from 16 to 32 weeks. The sex of the single kids had no effect on lactation yield. Milk composition was not affected by the number or sex of the kids suckled. Fat, protein and ash concentration fell during the 1st month of lactation and thereafter showed a gradual rise. Lactose concentration fell gradually after the 2nd month. Both live weight and body condition of the goats increased continuously throughout lactation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anifantakis, E. M. and Kandarakis, J. G. 1980. Contribution to the study of the composition of goat's milk. Milchwissenschaft 35: 617619.Google Scholar
British Standards Institute. 1963. Methods for the chemical analysis of liquid milk and cream. BS 1741 British Standards Institute, London.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N., Smith, W. F. and Louda, F. 1979. A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flamant, J. C. and Morand-Fehr, P. 1982. Milk production in sheep and goats. In Sheep and Production (ed. Coop, I. E.), pp. 275-295. World Animal Science Series, Vol. 26. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gall, C. 1981. Milk production. In Goat Production (ed. Gall, C.), pp. 309344. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Horak, F. and Pindak, A. 1969. Persistence of lactation in goats. Acta Univ. Agric. Fac. Agron., Brno. 17: 299306.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation. 1974. Determination of total nitrogen (standard No. 20/1962), lactose (standard No. 28/1964) and total solids (standard No. 21/1962) content of milk. International Dairy Federation, Brussels.Google Scholar
Katsaounis, N. and Zygoyiannis, D. 1984a. [Yield and composition of milk from Karagouniko ewes. 1. Ewes suckling Karagouniko lambs.] Reel Med. Vet. 745753.Google Scholar
Katsaounis, N. and Zygoyiannis, D. 1984b. [Yield and composition of milk from Karagouniko ewes. 2. Ewes suckling crossbred East Friesland x Karagouniko lambs.] Red Med. Vet. 160: 825832.Google Scholar
Louca, A., Mavrogenis, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1975. The effect of early weaning on the lactation performance of Damascus goats and the growth rate of the kids. Anim. Prod. 20: 213218.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. and Greenhalgh, J. F. D. 1973. Animal Nutrition. 2nd ed., p. 332Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P., Constantinou, A. and Louca, A. 1984. Environmental and genetic causes of variation in production traits of Damascus goats. 2. Goat productivity. Anim. Prod. 38: 99104.Google Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P. 1981. Growth. In Goat Production (ed. Gall, C.), pp. 253283. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P. and Sauvant, D. 1980. Composition and yield of goat milk as affected by nutritional manipulation. J. Dairy Sci. 63: 16711680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naude, R. T. and Hofmeyer, H. S. 1981. Meat production. In Goat Production (ed. Gall, C.), pp. 285307. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1982. Lactation of suckling ewes and does In Sheep and Goat Production (ed. Coop, I. E.), pp. 119133. World Animal Science Series, Vol. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 451454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar