Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:41:50.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of diet and frequency of watering on rumen degradability and outflow rate of low-quality veld hay and dry-matter apparent digestibility in steers given food at maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. Sibanda ,
P. R. Hatendi ,
F. M. Mulenga  and
P. Ndlovu
S. Sibanda
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
P. R. Hatendi
Affiliation:
Grasslands Research Station, P. Bag 3701, Marondera, Zimbabwe
F. M. Mulenga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
P. Ndlovu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access

Abstract

The effect of water restriction on rumen degradability and outflow rate of low quality veld hay and dry-matter apparent digestibility was investigated in four rumen cannulated Tuli × Friesian steers (mean weight 329 (s.d. 36·6) kg) given food at maintenance (metabolizable energy allowance (maintenance) (MJ) = 8·3 + 0·091 M). Two diets with 20: 80 (low, L) and 80:20 (high, H) roughage to concentrate ratios were used in combination with free access to water for 2·5 h once daily or once every 3rd day. A 4 × 4 Latin-square design with a 2 (diets) × 2 (watering frequencies) factorial arrangement of treatments was used.

The degradation pattern of veld hay was not affected by the type of diet and the watering frequency. Although the effective degradabilities of hay in steers given the two diets were low (177 and 258 g/kg for L and H, respectively), they were significantly different (P < 0·05) from each other. However, watering frequency did not affect the effective degradability of hay (218 and 217 g/kg). While the low roughage diet had a higher rumen outflow rate for Crmordanted hay than the high roughage diet (0·047 per h and 0·031 per h), this was not statistically significant. The same outflow rate was obtained for the two watering frequencies (0·039 per h).

Keywords

beef cattledigestibilitymaintenancenutrient densitywater intake
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brosh, A., Shkolnik, A. and Chosniak, I. 1986. Metabolic effects of infrequent drinking and low quality feed on Bedouin goats. Ecology 67:1086–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassida, K. A. and Stokes, M. 1986. Eating and resting salivation in early lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62:1282–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, M. H. 1956. The effect of infrequent water intake on the consumption and digestibility of hay by Zebu cattle. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 24:128–136.Google Scholar
Fuquay, J. W. 1981. Heat stress as it affects animal production. Journal of Animal Science 52:164–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grovum, W. L. and Williams, V. J. 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constraints derived from the changes in concentration of markers in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatendi, P. R., Mulenga, F. M., Sibanda, S. and Ndlovu, P. 1996. The effect of diet and frequency of watering on the performance of growing cattle given food at maintenance. Animal Science 63:33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keulen, J. van and Young, B. A. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, Cambridge 44:282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kijora, C., Bartelt, J. and Bergner, H. 1989. Influence of a reduced water supply on the digestibility of nutrients and on the digestibility of nutrients and on some metabolism parameters in sheep. 1. Digestibility of nutrients and passage rate of the Cr203 marker. Archives of Animal Nutrition 39:429–441.Google Scholar
Marquardt, D. W. 1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of non-linear parameters. Journal of Sociology, Industry and Applied Mathematics 11:431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference book 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Musimba, N. K. R., Galyean, M. L., Whittington, D. L. and Pieper, R. D. 1987. Influence of frequency of drinking on particulate passage rate and dry matter disappearance in grazing zebu cattle. Journal of Range Management 40:415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, M. J. 1989. Depression of dry matter intake and water intake in Boran cattle owing to physiological, volumetric and temporal limitations. Animal Production 49: 29–34.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hovell, F. D. deB. and Mould, F. 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5:195–213.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from the incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92:499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N. 1985. Effect of dehydration on feed intake and dry matter digestibility in desert (black bedouin) and non-desert (Swiss Saanen) goats fed on lucerne hay. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 80A: 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N. 1987. Impact of shade in a hot Mediterranean summer on feed intake, feed utilization and body fluid distribution in sheep. Appetite 9: 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N. 1992. Effects of water scarcity and hot environment on appetite and digestion in ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 30:175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N. and Tadmor, A. 1989. Rumen volume, saliva flow rate and systemic fluid homeostasis in dehydrated cattle. American Journal of Physiology 256: R809–R815.Google ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. and Langen, H. de. 1960. Measurement of food intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VII. Modified wet digestion method for determination of chromic oxide in faeces. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Science 3:314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R. F. and Yates, N. G. 1969. Some effects of water restriction on apparent digestibility and water excretion of cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H. and Oliver, J. 1993. Animal foods of central Africa. Technical handbook no. 2. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal.Google Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. and Van Soest, P. J. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed