Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:43:13.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal size and efficiency: basic concepts†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. E. Dickerson
G. E. Dickerson
Affiliation:
US Meat Animal Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 1978 , pp. 367 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, R. D., Large, R. V. and Spedding, C. R. W. 1973. Size of animal in relation to productivity with special reference to the ruminant-economic aspects. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. 1976. The choice of selection objectives in meat-producing animals. In Meat Animals: Growth and Productivity (ed. Lister, D., Rhodes, D. N., Fowler, V. R. and Fuller, M. F.), pp. 449–462. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., Teague, H. S. and Young, L. D. 1977. Long-term backfat vs. breeder selection in swine. II. Crossbred pig performance. Abstr. 69th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci., p. 15 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Henderson, P. A. and Bitney, L. L. 1977. Estimated livestock production costs. In Estimated Crop and Livestock Production Costs, Univ. Nebaska, Dept. agric. Econ. Rep. No. 72, pp. F1–F17.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. 1973. Size of animal in relation to productivity. Nutritional aspects. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W. 1977. Choosing between animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B 281: 121–137.Google Scholar
Klosterman, E. W. 1972. Beef cattle size for maximum efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 875–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M., Dikeman, M. E., Allen, D. M., May, M., Crouse, J. D. and Campion, D. R. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. III. Carcass composition, quality and palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laster, D. B., Smith, G. M. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. IV. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, W. D. 1939. Climate and Evolution. 2nded. Spec.Publ.N.Y. Acad. Sci., No. 1.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L. S. 1969. Relative size of calf and dam and the frequency of calving difficulties. Anim. Prod. 11: 293–306.Google Scholar
Notter, D. R. 1977. Simulated efficiency of beef production for a cow-calf-feedlot management system. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Nebraska.Google Scholar
Peden, D. G., Van dyne, G. M., Rice, R. W. and Hansen, R. M. 1974. Trophic ecology of Bison bison I. on short grass plains J. appl. Ecol. 11: 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullar, J. D. and Webster, A. J. F. 1977. The energy cost of fat and protein deposition in the rat. Br.J. Nutr. 37: 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. T. 1974. Energy metabolism in the whole animal. In The Control of Metabolism. (ed. Sink, J. D.), Chap. 7. Penn. State Univ. Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1973. Body size and efficiency. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B., Cundiff, L. V. and Gregory, K. E. 1976. Characterization of biological types of cattle. II. Postweaning growth and feed efficiency of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 43: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. R., Caldwell, S. L. and Rowntree, V. J. 1972. Running up and down hills: some consequences of size. Science, N.Y. 178: 1096–1097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, St C. S. 1973. Genetic differences in milk production in relation to mature body weight. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. {New Series) 2: 15–26.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1966. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with live weight and food intake controlled. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Touchberry, R. W., Goodrich, R. D. and Meiske, J. C. 1976. Intraspecies relationship between fasting heat production and body weight: A reevaluation of W0·75, J. Anim. Sci. 43: 692–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorbek, G. 1977. The energetics of protein deposition during growth. Nutr. Me tab. 21: 105–118.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, C. T., Dickerson, G. E. and Deshazer, J. A. 1977. Selection for rate and efficiency of lean gain in rats. Abstr. 69th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci., p. 37. (Abstr.).Google Scholar