Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:20:19.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introducing a special issue with a focus on systematic reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

J. M. Sargeant  and
A. M. O'Connor
J. M. Sargeant*
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Canada Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Canada
A. M. O'Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Systematic reviews answer specific review questions by following structured steps and employing specific methods to reduce the risk of bias and to maximize transparency in the process of the review, and systematic review methodology differs from traditional narrative reviews in many ways. As a journal devoted to reviews, it is appropriate that Animal Health Research Reviews (AHRR) includes this approach to reviews of the literature. The aim of this special issue of AHRR was to illustrate the scope of articles that can be considered for submission to the systematic review section of this journal for prospective authors and readers.

Keywords

systematic reviewprotocolsupdates
Type
Introduction
Information
Animal Health Research Reviews , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Systematic Reviews , June 2016 , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, S, Lindahl, J, Roesel, K, Traore, SG, Yobouet, BA, Ndour, APN, Carron, M and Grace, D (2016a). Where literature is scarce: observations and lessons learnt from four reviews of zoonoses in African countries. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 16–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alonso, S, Dohoo, A, Lindahl, J, Verdugo, C, Akuku, I and Grace, D (2016b). Prevalence of Tuberculosis, Brucellosis and Trypanosomiasis in cattle in Tanzania: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buczinski, S, Fecteau, G, Chigerwe, M and Vandeweerd, JM (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of refractometer and Brix refractometer to assess failure of passive transfer in calves: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 3–8.Google Scholar
Cullen, JN, Yuan, C, Totton, S, Dzikamunhenga, R, Coetzee, JF, da Silva, CN, Wang, C and O'Connor, AM (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the antibiotic treatment for infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: an update. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 59–74.Google Scholar
Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, Mulrow, C, Gotzsche, PC, Ioannidis, JP, Clarke, M, Devereaux, PJ, Kleijnen, J and Moher, D (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62: e1–e34.Google Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG and the PRISMA group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62: 1006–1012.Google Scholar
Moher, D, Stewart, L and Shekelle, P (2016). Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors. Systematic Reviews 5: 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, AM and Sargeant, JM (2014). Finally, the opportunity to publish systematic review protocols, systemic reviews and guidelines in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety. Animal Health Research Reviews 15: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, AM, Wellman, NG, Evans, RB and Roth, DR (2006). A review of randomized clinical trials reporting antibiotic treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in cattle. Animal Health Research Reviews 7: 119–127.Google Scholar
Shamseer, L, Moher, D, Clarke, M, Ghersi, D, Liberati, A, Petticrew, M, Shekelle, P, Stewart, LA and Group, P-P (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. British Medical Journal 349: g7647.Google Scholar
Totton, SC, Glanville, JM, Dzikamunhenga, RS, Dickson, JS and O'Connor, AM (2016). Systematic review of the magnitude of change in prevalence and quantity of Salmonella after administration of pathogen reduction treatments on pork carcasses. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 38–58.Google Scholar
Williams-Nguyen, J, Bueno, I, Sargeant, JM, Nault, AJ and Singer, RS (2016). What is the evidence that point sources of anthropogenic effluent increase antibiotic resistance in the environment? Protocol for a systematic review. Animal Health Research Reviews 17: 9–15.Google Scholar