Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:16:49.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scope and Methodology of Twin Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Gordon Allen
Gordon Allen*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
*
Div. of Biometry and Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health, ADAMHA, Room, 18 C 26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of twins as a research tool is still proving its worth both by the number of scientists engaged in twin research and by the significance of their results. Old, familiar research designs are finding new applications, and new research designs are appearing. Of greatest current interest are the epidemiological studies made possible by the assembly and the aging of large numbers of twins in twin registries. As an outgrowth partly of the twin registries, partly of conceptual and mathematical progress, new methods have emerged for diagnosis of twin types and for analysis of twin data. One line of development started with the questionnaire method of zygosity diagnosis and has given rise most recently to zygosity diagnosis by principal component analysis. Another line started with probability calculations and has led to the use of generalized distance and noncentral chi-square. The appropriateness of these methods in different contexts needs to be critically considered. Also of importance are the psychologists' new methods of extracting genetic “factors”. The greatest weakness of twin studies, long recognized, is their dependence on the assumption that DZ pairs provide an adequate control on the environmental differences within MZ pairs. This may be valid with respect to environmental influences that are highly self-selected. It is debatable for self-selected influences that differ among families, and clearly untenable for most influences imposed by the social environment peculiar to twins.

Type
3. Scope and Methodology of Twin Studies
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. 1955. Comments on the analysis of twin samples. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 4: 143–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aurias, A., Lejeune, J. 1974. Monozygotic heterocaryotic twinning. Proc. 1st Int. Congr. Twin Studies, Rome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 25: 50–52.Google Scholar
Bakwin, H. 1971. Car-sickness in twins. Dev. Med. Child Neurol., 13: 310–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boklage, C.E. 1974. A neglected element in twin-study genetics of human mental development. Proc. 1st Int. Congr. Twin Studies, Rome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 25: 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J., Lewis, M. 1974. Attachment behavior in thirteen month-old, opposite-sex twins. Child Dev., 45: 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M.G. 1970. The Biology of Twinning in Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R.B., Blewett, D.B., Beloff, J.R. 1955. The inheritance of personality. A multiple variance analysis determination of approximate nature-nurture ratios for primary personality factors in Q-data. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 7: 122–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Cederlöf, R., Friberg, L., Jonsson, E., Kaij, L. 1961. Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. Acta Genet. (Basel), 11: 338–362.Google ScholarPubMed
Christian, J.C., Kang, K.W., Norton, J.A. Jr. 1974. Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26: 154–161.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, D.J., Dibble, E., Grawe, J.M., Pollin, W. 1973. Separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 29: 465–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, D.J., Dibble, E., Grawe, J.M., Pollin, W. 1975. Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 32: 1371–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defrise-Gussenhoven, E. 1967. Generalized distance in genetic studies. Acta Genet. (Basel), 17: 275–288.Google Scholar
Defrise-Gussenhoven, E. 1968. Noncentral χ2 in twin-studies. Acta Genet. (Basel), 18: 170–179.Google Scholar
Dencker, S.J. 1958. A follow-up study of 128 closed head injuries in twins using co-twins as controls. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. [Suppl.], 123, Vol. 33.Google Scholar
Eaves, L.J. 1972. Computer simulation of sample size and experimental design in human psychogenetics. Psychol. Bull., 77: 144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaves, L.J. 1973. The structure of genotypic and environmental covariation for personality measurements: an analysis of the PEN. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 12: 275–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J.H. 1960. The simulation of Mendelism. Acta Genet. (Basel.), 10: 63–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Essen-Möller, E. 1941. Empirische Ähnlichkeitsdiagnose bei Zwillingen. Hereditas, 27: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D.S. 1965. The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann. Hum. Genet., 29: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedda, L., Tatarelli, R. 1971. Essential isochronic epilepsy in MZ twin pairs. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 20: 280–383.Google ScholarPubMed
Hrubec, Z. 1973. The effect of diagnostic ascertainment in twins on the assessment of the genetic factor in disease etiology. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 25: 15–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Jablon, S., Neel, J.V., Gershowitz, H., Atkinson, G.F. 1967. The NAS-NRC twin panel: methods of construction of the panel, zygosity diagnosis, and proposed use. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 19: 133–161.Google Scholar
Jinks, J.L., Fulker, D.W. 1970. Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol. Bull., 73: 311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloepfer, H.W., Parisi, P. 1974. Penetrance of gene for absent c-triradius from MZ twins. Proc. 1st Int. Coner. Twin Studies, Rome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 25: 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehlin, J.C. 1965. A heredity-environment analysis of personality inventory data. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 163–168]. New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehlin, J.C., Vandenberg, S.G. 1968. Genetic and environmental components in the covariation of cognitive abilities: an additive model. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Progress in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 261–278]. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. 1974. Biology of the twinning phenomenon: embryogenesis and teratogenesis. Proc. 1st Int. Congre. Twin Studies, Rome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 25: 41–49.Google Scholar
Nance, W.E. 1974. Genetic studies of the offspring of identical twins. Proc. 1st Tnt. Congr. Twin Studies, Rome. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 25: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, P.L., Broman, S.H. 1974. Familial resemblance in infant mental development. Developmental Psychology, 10: 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, R.C. 1965. The National Merit Twin Study. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.), Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 231–242]. New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, R.C., Bilbro, W.C. Jr. 1966. The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet. (Basel), 16: 265–275.Google ScholarPubMed
Osborne, R.H., Horowitz, S.L., De George, F.V. 1958. Genetic variatin in tooth dimensions. A twin studv of the permanent anterior teeth. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 10: 350–356.Google Scholar
Partanen, J., Bruun, K., Markkanen, T. 1966. Inheritance of Drinking Behavior. A Study on Intelligence, Personality, and Use of Alcohol of Adult Twins. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell..Google Scholar
Pollin, W., Stabenau, J.R. 1966. Findings from the intensive study of a series of ientical twins discordant for schizophrenia, and their releavnce to theories concerning the etiology of schizophrenia. In: Excerpta Medica Proc. 4th World Congr. Psychiatry, Madrid. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series No. 150, pp. 1107–1111.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, D. 1959. Some factors associated with concordance and discordance with respect to schizophrenia in monozygotic twins. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 129: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S. 1968. Environmental bias in twin studies. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Progress in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 205–213]. Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.T., Feinleib, M. 1974. Twin heritability study. In Goldberg, M.F. (ed): Genetics and Metabolic Eye Disease [pp. 37–58], Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Google Scholar
Schwartz, J.T., Reuling, F.H., Feinleib, M., Garrison, R.J., Collie, D.J. 1973. Twin study on ocular pressure following topically applied dexamethasone. II. Inheritance of variation in pressure response. Arch. Ophthalmol., 90: 281–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvin, S. 1970. Concordance in a twin population model. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 19: 584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1974. Concordance in twins: methods and interpretation. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26: 454–466.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, S.M., Penrose, L.S. 1955. Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. Hum. Genet., 19: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafford, R.E. 1970. Estimation of the interaction between heredity and environment for musical aptitude of twins. Hum. Hered., 20: 356–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staley, R.N., Green, L.J. 1974. Types of tooth cusp occurrence asymmetry in human monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 40: 187–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, H.E. 1965. General discussion. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 298–300]. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, H.E., Clark, P.J., Schull, W.J. 1955. The use of multi-allele genetic characters in the diagnosis of twin zygotity. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 7: 180–188.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S.G. 1965. Multivariate analysis of twin differences. In Vandenberg, S.G. (ed.): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics [pp. 29–40]. New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesell, E.S., Page, J.G. 1968. Genetic control of drug levels in man: phenylbutazone. Science, 159: 1479–1480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrydagh-Laoreux, S., Defrise-Gussenhoven, E. 1971. Méthodologie de l'étude biométrique des jumeaux. Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 7: 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R.S. 1970. Blood typing and twin zygosity. Hum. Hered., 20: 30–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization 1966. The use of twins in epidemiological studies. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Roma), 15: 109–128.Google Scholar
Wilde, G.J.S. 1970. An experimental study of mutual behaviour imitation and person perception in MZ and DZ twins. Acta Genet. Med.Gemellol. (Roma), 19: 273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed