Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:42:45.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fingerprints of the Sayyads of Lucknow Uttar Pradesh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

A.C. Srivastava
A.C. Srivastava*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Lucknow University, India
*
Anthropological Survey of India, North Western Station, 51/7 Hardwar Road, Dehra Dun-248001, India

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study of the fingerprints of the Sayyads of Lucknow district, Uttar Pradesh, has given the following frequencies: whorls 40.87%, loops 56.33% and arches 2.80%. The mean pattern intensity is 13.81 ± 0.27, showing no significant differences with neither the upper nor the lower-caste Hindus of U.P., excepting the Purabia Chamar.

As for the ridge count, the Sayyads show a mean of 151.52 ± 3.62, which is highest as compared to Hindu populations of U.P. However, no significant differences are apparent between the Sayyads and Brahmins, Rajputs, and Ahirs. The Sayyads are found to differ significantly from the earlier Muslim sample reported by Singh (1961).

A comparison of the Sayyads with their coreligionists residing in the distant lands from India fails to reveal consistent dermatoglyphic affinities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1972 , pp. 337 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1972

References

REFERENCES

Ansari, G. 1960. Muslim caste in Uttar Pradesh: a study of culture contact. The Eastern Anthropologist, 13: 1–83.Google Scholar
Cummins, H., Midlo, C. 1961. Fingerprints, Palms and Soles. An Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Holt, S.B. 1949. A quantitative survey of fingerprints of a small sample of the British population. Ann. Eugen. (London), 14: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, D.R. 1967. Finger dermatoglyphics from Nuristan, Afghanistan. Man, 2: 119–125.Google Scholar
Newman, M.T. 1960. Populational analysis of finger and palm prints in Highland and Lowland Maya Indians. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 18: 45–58.Google Scholar
Singh, R.D. 1961. Digital pattern frequency and size variation in some castes of Uttar Pradesh. The Eastern Anthropologist, 14: 169–181.Google Scholar
Srivastava, R.P. 1962. Dermatoglyphic basis of caste distinction in a district of eastern Uttar Pradesh. The Eastern Anthropologist, 15: 38–45.Google Scholar
Srivastava, R.P., Shukla, B.R.K. 1966. A quantitative study of dermatoglyphics of Purbia Chamars and Gujar Pasis of Uttar Pradesh. The Anthropologist, 13: 65–71.Google Scholar