Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:20:01.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Familial Twinning: A Case for Superfetation in Man*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

S.A. Rhine  and
Walter E. Nance
S.A. Rhine
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Walter E. Nance*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
*
Department of Human Genetics, Box 33, MCV Station, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A family is described in which the tendency to bear twins is expressed in the offspring of males as well as females. All of the twins born in this family show marked discordance in birth weight and gestational age. In 5 of the 6 pairs, one twin was normal while the other was either a macerated fetal mass, stillborn, or died of prematurity in the neonatal period. The one pair in which both twins did survive is known to be DZ and showed a difference in maturity and a 21% discrepancy in birth weight. Thus, twinning in this family appears to be transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait which is expressed in the offspring of both female and male carriers. Of all possible genetic mechanisms which could explain this familial aggregation of markedly discordant twins, supcrfetation seems most consistent with the genetic transmission and expression of the trait in the offspring of both males and females. The most plausible explanation of the pedigree is that a dominant gene is segregating in the family which is expressed in the fetal placenta where it acts to reverse the normal hormonal inhibition of ovulation. Since both the father and the mother contribute to the genotype of the placenta, superfeiation could occur among offspring of both males and females who carry the gene.

Type
2. The Twinning Phenomenon
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 66 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1976

Footnotes

*

This is publication number 74-25 from the Department of Medical Genetics, and was supported in part by the Indiana University Human Genetics Center, POI HD 10291-01 and a grant from the John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc.

References

REFERENCES

Albert, A. 1969. Follicle-stimulating activity of HCG. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 29: 1502–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M. G. 1960. The familial incidence of twinning. Ann. Hum. Genet., 24: 1–3.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M.G. 1970. The Biology of Twinning in Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Camiel, M.R. 1967. Fetus papyraceus with intrauterine sibling death. JAMA, 202: 247.Google Scholar
Davenport, C.B. 1928. Is the inheritance of twinning tendency from fathers side? In Nachtscheim, H. (ed.): Verhandlungen des 5 Internationaien Kongresses für Vererbungswissenschaft. Leipzig: Borntrager.Google Scholar
Druker, P., Finkel, J., Savel, L.E. 1960. Sixty-five day interval between the birth of twins. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 80: 761–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, J.T., Seddon, R.J., Liggins, G.C. 1973. A study of a pregnancy with low estrogen production due to placental sulfatase deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 36: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
France, J.T. 1974. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Green, Q.L., Schanck, G.P., Smith, J.R. 1961. Normal living twins in uterus didelphys with 38 day interval between deliveries. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 82: 340–42.Google Scholar
Greulich, W.W. 1934. Heredity in human twinning. Am. J. Phys. Antropol., 19: 391–431.Google Scholar
Haour, F., Sacena, B.B. 1974. Detection of gonadotropin in rabbit blastocyst before implantation. Science, 185: 444–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, Y.V. 1974. Michele Savonarola and the fera or blighted twin phenomenon. Medical History, 18: 222–39.Google Scholar
Reid, D.E., Ryan, K.J., Benirschke, K. 1972. Principles and management of human reproduction. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Scrimgeour, J.B., Baker, T.G. 1974. A possible case of superfetation in man. J. Reprod. Fert., 36: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, S.J. 1974. The physiology of human reproduction. Sci. Am., 231: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Studdiford, W.E. 1936. Is superfetation possible in the human being? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 31: 845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeplassche, M. 1969. The physiological explanation of split parturition in the pig and other mammalian species. Ann. Endocrinol., 30: 328–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, W. 1902. Beiträge zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Mehrlingsgeburten beim Menschen. Pflugers, Arch. ges. Physiol., 88: 346–430.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. 1909. Zur Bedeutung der Mehrlingsgeburten für die Frage der Bestimmung des Geschlechts. Arch. f. Rassen-u Gesellsch-Biol., 6: 28–32.Google Scholar
White, C., Wyshak, G. 1964. Inheritance in human dizygotic twinning. New Engl. J. Med., 271: 1003–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyshak, G., White, C. 1965. Genealogical study of human twinning. Am. J. Public Health., 55: 1586–93.Google Scholar