Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:47:45.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blood Group Mythology: Present Status*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Alexander S. Wiener*
Affiliation:
Serological Laboratory, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of New York City, and Department of Forensic Medicine, University Medical School, New York, N.Y., USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The discovery of a great multiplicity of previously unknown facts and principles has served to develop the field of blood grouping into an important complex science. The formidable task of mastering the now highly complex field of blood grouping has been facilitated by the avallability of a comprehensive text on almost all aspects of the subject, which is now in its sixth edition. This invaluable source book is widely used by advanced workers in the field as well as by beginners, and is treated as the bible on the subject to the exclusion of all other texts. However, the so-called bible has serious scientific faults in that important basic principies are ignored, and certain important basic facts are distorted or misrepresented. Fortunately, other texts are available which are free of these faults, and the use of a single book as the sole source of knowledge concerning the subject has by implication given rise to the myth that the book in question is infallible and may be used alone to the exclusion of all other sources of information. The purpose of the present review has been, not to detract from the well recognized merits of the important “blood group bible” but to point out its limitations, and to point out the existence of other sources which, while not as comprehensive, are free of mythology. If this review serves to remind the readers to consult other sources in addition to the blood group bible, it will have served its purpose, and this may lead to further advances in the field of blood grouping as well as help do away with the thriving field of blood group mythology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977

Footnotes

*

Presented before the American Association of Blood Banks, by invitation, as a special lecture on November 13, 1975, in Chicago, Illinois.

References

REFERENCES

Allison, A.C. 1954. The distribution of the sickle-cell trait in East Africa and elsewhere, and its apparent relationship to the incidence of subtertian malaria. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 48: 312318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdel, L. 1960. Groupes Sanguins et Tempéraments. Paris: Libraire Maloine.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, J.A., Wohlhead, E.B., Colter, D.C., Tiedrick, R.T., Knowles, L.A. 1956. ABO blood groups and diaease. JAMA, 162: 1210.Google Scholar
Erskine, A.G. 1973. Principles and Practice of Blood Grouping (pp. 365). St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.Google Scholar
Hollán, S.R. 1972. Current Topics in Immunohematology and Immunogenetics; Festschrift, Alexander S. Wiener (pp. 198). Budapest: Academy Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G.C., Mollison, P.L., Race, R.R. 1961. Anti-D and Begonia punctata . Lancet, 1: 1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, R.B. 1966. The Genetics of Gastro-Intestinal Disorders. Oxford.Google Scholar
Miller, L.H., Mason, S.J., Dvorek, J.A., McGinness, M.H., Rothman, LH. 1975. Erythrocyte receptors for Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: Duffy blood group determinants. Science, 189: 561.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, B.A., Hall, J.G. 1966. Association between potassium concentration and serological type of sheep red cells. Science, 151: 15511552.Google Scholar
Schreffler, D.C. 1965. Genetic studies of blood group associated variations in a human serum alkaline phosphatase. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 87: 7186.Google Scholar
Simononvić, B., and Stefanović, B. 1961. Acquired immunity in plants. VIII. The identification of the immune anti-D lectin. Prog. 8th Congr. Int. Soc. Blood Transf., II-b-15.Google Scholar
Springer, G.F., Horton, R.G. 1969. Blood group isoantibody stimulation in man by feeding blood group-active bacteria. J. Clin. Invest., 58: 12801291.Google Scholar
Springer, G.F., Wieners, A.S. 1962. Alleged causes of the present-day world distribution of the human ABO blood groups. Nature, 193: 444446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, G.J., Stivel, V. 1950. Group specific appearance of plasma clots. Blood, 5: 11501155.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S., Lederer, M., Palayes, S.H. 1926. Studies in isohemagglutination. I. Theoretical considerations. J. Immunol., 16: 469482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1929. A note on the paper: “Studies in isohemagglutination”. J. Immunol., 17: 357360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1935. Blood Groups and Blood Transfusion. Springfiela, Ill.: C.C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1954. Rh-Hr Blood Types; Applications in Clinical and Legal Medicine and Anthropology (pp. 726733). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1955. The Rh-Hr blood types; a budget of paradoxes. J. Forensic Med., 2: 224242.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1960. Modern blood group mythology. J. Forensic Med., 4: 166176.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1970. LW factor. In Aminoff, D. (ed.): Blood and Tissue Antigens. New York/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S. 1970. Advances in Blood Grouping (Vol. III, pp. 658). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Wiener, A.S., A 1976. A-B-0 Blood Groups and Lewis Types. New York: Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Co. Google Scholar