Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:54:29.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Factors for the Differential Staining of Sister Chromatids in Human Chromosomes Using Giemsa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Reita Nand*
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, India
P. K. Ghosh
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, India
*
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, India

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Various reagents were tested for the purpose of developing an improved Giemsa staining technique for the differential staining of sister chromatids in human chromosomes. Reagents like acids, bases, buffers, protein denaturants and proteolytic enzymes were all potent inducers of differential staining. The best results were obtained by brief trypsinization followed by extraction of nucleic acids by incubation in hot HCl. There was poor contrast between unifilarly and bifilarly BrdU substituted chromatids in slides from which trypsin treatment was omitted. The method of slide preparation as they affect the spreads of BrdU substituted metaphases were also evaluated. The results support the role of these reagents in the conformational changes and structural lesions of chromosomal protein leading to differential staining.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1978

Footnotes

* Aided by C.S.I.R. Grant No. 7/45 (1052/77) EMR, I

References

REFERENCES

David, J., Gordon, J.S., Rutter, W.J. 1974. Increased thermal stability of chromatin containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine substituted DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 28082812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, K., Akematsu, T., Shimazu, H., Sugiyama, T. 1975. Simple differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after treatment with photosensitive dyes and exposure to light and the mechanism of staining. Chromosoma 53: 223230.Google Scholar
Ikushima, T., Wolff, S. 1974. Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 5-Bromode-oxyuridine and 5-iododeoxyuridine substituted chinese hamster chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 87: 1519.Google Scholar
Kato, H. 1974. Spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges detected by a BudR labelling method. Nature (Lond.) 251: 7072.Google Scholar
Kim, A. 1974. Chromatidaustausch und Heterochromatineränderungen menschlicher Chromosomen nach BudR-Markierung. Humangenetik 25: 179188.Google Scholar
Korenberg, J.R., Freedlender, E.F. 1974. Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 48: 355360.Google Scholar
Latt, S.A. 1973. Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acac. Sci. USA 70: 3395–99.Google Scholar
Lin, M.S., Alfi, O.S. 1976. Detection of sister chromatid exchanges by 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenyl-Indole fluorescence. Chromosoma 57: 219225.Google Scholar
Mousseron-Canet, M., Mani, J.C. 1975. Photochemistry and molecular reactions. Jerusalem: Israel Program Sci. Transl. 268.Google Scholar
Pathak, S., Stock, A.D., Lusby, A. 1975. A combination of sister chromatid differential staining and Giemsa banding. Experientia 31: 916918.Google Scholar
Perry, P., Wolff, S. 1974. New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature (Lond.) 251: 156158.Google Scholar
Scheres, J.M.J.C., Hustinx, T.W.J., Rutten, F.J., Merkx, G.F.M. 1977. Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids. Exp. Cell Res. 109: 466468.Google Scholar
Takayama, S., Sakanishi, S. 1977. Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after extraction with acids. Chromosoma 64: 109115.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.H. 1958. Sister chromatid exchanges in tritium labelled chromosomes. Genetics 43: 515529.Google Scholar
Wolff, S., Perry, P. 1974. Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography. Chromosoma 48: 341353.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. 1977. Sister chromatid exchange. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11: 183201.Google Scholar
Wolff, S., Bodycote, J. 1977. The production of harlequin chromosomes with chemical and physical agents that disrupt protein structure. In: Human Molecular Cytogenetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zakharov, A.F., Egolina, N.A. 1972. Differential spiralisation along mammalian mitotic chromosomes. 1. BUdR-revealed differentiation in chinese hamster chromosomes. Chromosoma 38: 341365.Google Scholar