Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:58:49.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert S. Erikson
Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis demonstrates that the relative growth of per capita income change is an important determinant of post-World War II presidential election outcomes. Per capita income change is even a better predictor of presidential election outcomes than the electorate's relative attraction to the Democratic and Republican candidates as calibrated in National Election Study surveys. The significance of this finding is discussed.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 567 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brody, Richard, and Sigelman, Lee. 1983. “Presidential Popularity and Presidential Elections: An Update and an Extension.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47:325–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Roy C. 1978. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60:159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Roy C. 1988. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: A1984 Update.” Political Behavior 10:168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Thomas, and Rodgers, Joel. 1986. Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr., 1987. The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kagay, Michael R., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1980. “A Reformed Electorate? Well, at Least a Changed Electorate.” In Paths to Political Reform, ed. Crotty, William J.. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Rivers, Douglas. 1985a. “A Retrospective on Retrospective Voting.” In Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes, ed. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Eulau, Heinz. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Rivers, Douglas. 1985b. “The Economic Basis of Reagan's Appeal.” In The New Direction in American Politics, ed. Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Rice, Tom. 1982. “Presidential Popularity and the Presidential Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46:534–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-sectional Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1966. “Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency.” American Political Science Review 60:19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.