Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T00:21:23.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tagle v. Regan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The decision by Chief Judge Atkins of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida is unreported.

2 510 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1975).

3 Section 201 of the regulations prohibited the Cuban heir from withdrawing his share of the assets. 643 F.2d 1058, 1064 n.8.

4 Id. at 1067.

5 Id. at 1068.

6 See, e.g., International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. §§1701–1706 (Supp. III 1979) (amending 50 U.S.C. app. §5(b) (1976)).

7 424 F.2d 833 (D.C. Cir. 1970).

8 Id. at 838.

9 In Richardson v. Simon (560 F.2d 500, 503 (2d Cir. 1977), appeal dismissed, 435 U.S. 939(1978)), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected the Real court’s analysis and held that the broad executive powers granted by the TWEA supported the regulation’s inclusion of the decedent among those having interests in the estate.