Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:16:34.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National Treaty Law and Practice. Edited by Duncan B. Hollis, Merritt R. Blakeslee, and L. Benjamin Ederington. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005. Pp. xv, 837. Index. $279, €195. - Developments of International Law in Treaty Making. Edited by Rüdiger Wolfrum and Volker Röben. Berlin, New York: Springer, 2005. Pp. viii, 632. $129.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Anthony Aust*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Denza, Eileen, The Relationship Between International Law and National Law, in International Law 415 (Malcolm, D. Evans ed., 2003).Google Scholar

2 [Editor’s Note: The reviewer is a former Deputy Legal Adviser, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London.]

3 In The Development of the Role of the Security Council 365 (René-Jean Dupuy ed., 1993).

4 Published in 2000 by Cambridge University Press (see pages 143-61), and published in October 2005 (in Chinese) by the China Renmin University Press, Beijing. A second English edition will be published in autumn 2007.

5 Published in 1992 by Longman, London (see pages 52-86).

6 In The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law 141 (Francis, Geoffrey Jacobs & Roberts, Shelley eds., 1987).Google Scholar

7 Still often quaintly referred to, even at the highest levels of the U.S. government, as “Great Britain.” After over two hundred years, this reluctance to call it by its correct name, the “United Kingdom” (formally adopted after the union with Ireland in 1801), is unfortunately shared by other states. The German government often refers to “Grossbritannien.”

8 See, e.g., Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hung./Slovk.), 1997 ICJ Rep. 1, paras. 42-46, 99 (Sept. 25).

9 The 1988 UN Convention on International Bills of Exchange and International Promissory Notes (GA Res. 43/165 (Dec. 9, 1988)) is admittedly less successful. Although it will enter into force when it has but ten parties, so far it has only four (Gabon, Guinea, Honduras, and Mexico).

10 See Fox, Hazel, The Law of State Immunity (2002)Google Scholar.

11 GA Res. 59/38 (Dec. 2, 2004).

12 See Watts, Arthur, 3 The International Law Commission 1945-1998, at 2000103.Google Scholar

13 See the table of cases in Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (2002).Google Scholar

14 109 UNTS 21. Although amended many times, it is still in force nearly thirty years later.

15 Jackson, supra note 6.

16 See Denza, supra note 1.

17 [Editor’s Note: The book, The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council, is reviewed in this issue of the Journal]

18 Another article in the book— Anthony D’Amato’s long, detailed “International Law as an Autopoietic System”— was written essentially for publication rather than presentation and was consequently not easy to summarize at the symposium itself.

19 Edited by Chanaka Wickremasinghe, at xxi (2000).