Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:40:51.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Il regolamento delle controversie neldiritto del mare: rapporti tra procedimenti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Hugo Caminos*
Affiliation:
University of Miami School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 [Editor’s note: The English translation of the title of this book is Dispute Resolution in the Law of the Sea: Relationships Between Different Settlement Procedures.]

2 See Bernard, H. Oxman Complementary Agreements and Compulsory Jurisdiction , 95 AJIL 277 (2001).Google Scholar

3 All of the Tribunal’s decisions are available at http://www.itlos.org and in the ITLOS Reports series.

4 See Barbara, Kwiatkowska Case Report: Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), 94 AJIL 150 (2000).Google Scholar

5 Southern Bluefin Tuna (Austl. & N.Z. v. Japan), Jurisdiction and Admissibility (Aug. 4,2000), available at http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/bluefin/award080400.pdf; see also Barbara, Kwiatkowska Case Report: Southern Bluefin Tuna (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan), 95 AJIL 162 (2001)Google Scholar. See generally Oxman, supra note 2 (significant analysis of the award).

6 Case C-459/03, Commission v. Ireland (Eur. Ct. Justice May 30, 2006), available at http://curia.europa.eu; see also Cesare P. R. Romano, Case Report: Commission of the European Communities v. Ireland, 101 AJIL 171 (2007).

7 Chile—Measures Affecting Transit and Importation of Swordfish, WTO Doc. WT/DS193 (suspended Mar. 23, 2001).