Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:10:17.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Execution of Captain Fryatt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

James Brown Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1916 , pp. 865 - 877
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 New York Times Current History, September, 1916, p. 1017.

2 Ibid., p. 1019.

3 Resolutions of the Institute of International Law, Carnegie Endowment, 1916, p. 177.

4 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, 1913, Vol. 26, pp. 516–521, 607–609.

5 Handbuch des Völkerrechts, Vol. IV, pts. 1 and 2 (Dos Seekriegsrecht), pp. 284–285.

6 Zeilschrift für Völkerrecht, 1914 (Vol. VIII), p. 391.

7 See the decision of Chief Justice Marshall in the case of The Antelope, (10 Wheaton, 66, 122), decided in 1825, in which he held: “No principle of general law is more universally acknowledged, than the perfect equality of nations. Russia and Geneva have equal rights. It results from this equality, that no one can rightfully impose a rule on another. Each legislates for itself, but its legislation can operate on itself alone. A right, then, which is vested in all, by the consent of all, can be divested only by consent; and this [slave] trade, in which all have participated, must remain lawful to those who can not be induced to relinquish it. As no nation can prescribe a rule for others, none can make a law of nations; and this traffic remains lawful to those whose governments have not forbidden it.”

8 The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907, Carnegie Endowment, 1915, p. 146.

9 Huberich & King’s edition of the German Prize Code as in force July 1, 1915, page 75.