Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:30:29.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

District Court Holds That Detainees Brought from Other Countries to Afghanistan Can Seek U.S. Habeas Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

John R. Crook*
Affiliation:
General International and U.S. Foreign Relations Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schmitt, Eric Two Prisons, Similar Issues for President, N.Y. Times, Jan. 27, 2009, at A1Google Scholar; Richard, A. Oppel Jr., U.S. Captain Hears Pleas of Afghan Detainee, N.Y. Times, May 25, 2009, at A1.Google Scholar

2 al Maqaleh v. Gates, 604 F.Supp.2d 205 (D.D.C. 2009); see Savage, Charlie Judge Rules Some Prisoners at Bagram Have Right of Habeas Corpus, N.Y. Times, Apr. 2, 2009, at A14.Google Scholar

3 128 S.Ct. 2229 (2008).

4 604 F.Supp.2d at 207.

5 Id. at 214 (citation omitted)

6 Id. at 208-09.

7 Obama to Appeal Detainee Ruling, N.Y. Times, Apr. 11, 2009, at A6.Google Scholar

8 [Editor’s Note: Executive Order 13,493: Review of Detention Policy Options, 74 Fed. Reg. 4901 (Jan. 22, 2009).]

9 A Reckoning at Bagram, Editorial, Wash. Post, Mar. 7, 2009, at A12Google Scholar; The Next Guantdnamo, Editorial, N.Y. Times, Apr. 13, 2009, at A18.Google Scholar