Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:13:21.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

D.C. Circuit Vacates Investment Arbitration Award Against Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John R. Crook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 106 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 392 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 665 F.3d 1363 (D.C. Cir, Jan. 17, 2012).

2 Id. at 1365.

3 Id. at 1368.

4 Id., at 1367-68.

5 Section 10(a)(4) of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §10(a), provides that an arbitration award may be vacated “where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and def inite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.”

6 Republic of Argentina v. BG Group PLC, 715 F.Supp.2d 108 (D.D.C. 2010); Republic of Argentina v. BG Group PLC, 764 F.Supp.2d 21 (D.D.C. 2011).

7 BG Group, 665 F.3d at 1365-66 (footnote omitted).

8 Id., at 1369.

9 Id., 1370.

10 See Republic of Ecuador v. Chevron Corp., 638 F.3d 384 (2d Cir. 2011).

11 BG Group, 665 F.3d at 1371.

12 Id., at 1371-72 (citation omitted).

13 Id. at 1373 (citation omitted).