Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:14:41.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United Kingdom: United City Merchants (Investments) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada. (1982) 2 W.L.R. 1039

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 155 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The decision of the English Court of Appeal in this case is reported in [1981] 3 W.L.R. 242. For a discussion of this decision, see 76 AJIL 627 (1982).

2 United City Merchants (Investments) Ltd., to whom the Sellers transferred the credit as security for advances, appeared as coplaintiff.

3 [1982] 2 W.L.R. 1039, 1045.

4 Id. at 1047.

5 Id. at 1050. At the time of these transactions, both England and Peru were signatories to the Bretton Woods Agreement.