Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:07:20.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community. By D. G. Valentine. The Hague; Martinus Nijhoff; London: Batsford, 1955. pp. xii, 274. Gld. 12.50; 25 s.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Robert B. Looper
Robert B. Looper*
Affiliation:
Oxford University, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 451 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The bulk of this literature is in French and German periodicals. Significant articles on legal aspects of the Schuman Plan in American periodicals are the following: McKesson, , “The Schuman Plan,” 67 Pol. Sci. Q. 18 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bebr, , “The European Coal and Steel Community: A Political and Legal Innovation,” 63 Yale L. J. 1 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vernon, , “The Schuman Plan: Sovereign Powers of the European Coal and Steel Community,” 47 A. J. I. L. 183 (1953)Google Scholar; Stein, , “The European Coal and Steel Community: The Beginning of Its Judicial Process,” 55 Col. L. Rev. 985 (1955).Google Scholar

2 Since the writing of this book the Court has handed down several decisions.

3 To be sure the author does discuss certain pending cases, but in view of their pendency any comment upon the legal validity of the appeals would clearly have been out of place.