Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:23:42.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues in Evaluating the Significance of Archaeological Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael A. Glassow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evaluation of the significance of archaeological resources, mandated by federal, state, and local statutes, has forced American archaeologists to justify why sites or their contents should be preserved. The currently popular approach toward evaluation emphasizes determination of the relevance of archaeological resources to regional research problems. However, this approach fails to recognize that resources have values to research problems not yet conceived. It is argued, therefore, that evaluation must focus directly on the observational properties of resources. Using Spaulding's article, "Dimensions of Archaeology," as an initial inspiration, five such properties were defined: variety, quantity, clarity, integrity, and environmental context. A recent project in coastal California provides examples of how this alternative approach may be used.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 1977 , pp. 413 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glassow, Michael A., Spanne, Laurence W., and Quitter, Jeffrey 1976 Evaluation of archaeological sites on Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, California. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. Typescript.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C. 1975 Hecla II and III: An interpretive study of archaeological remains from the Lakeshore Project, Papago Reservation, south-central Arizona. Arizona State University Department of Anthropology Research Papers 9.Google Scholar
Lipe, William D. 1974 A conservation model for American archaeology. The Kiva 39 (3-4).Google Scholar
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation n.d. The National Register and archaeology: Suggestions to archaeologists regarding determination of eligibility. Typescript.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and House, John H. 1977 Cultural resource management and archaeological research. The Cache Project. Current Anthropology 18.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1960 The dimensions of archaeology. In Essays in the science of culture in honor of Leslie A. White, edited by Dole, G. E. and Carneiro, R. L., pp. 437–56. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1969 Regional sampling in archaeology: A pilot Great Basin research design. Archaeological Survey Annual Report, Vol. 2, pp. 87-100. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar