Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:50:56.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Teotihuacan to Tenochtitlan: The Early Period Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas H. Charlton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blanton ’s use of a hypothesis of warfare among Early Post- Teotihuacan sociocultural entities of the Basin of Mexico to account for selective reoccupation following the end of Teotihuacan is based ultimately on a conceptualization of a dichotomy between a peaceful Classic period and a warlike Postclassic period. Except for unoccupied areas between local concentrations of Early Toltec sites there are no data to support the warfare hypothesis. Through a presentation of available Early Toltec settlement pattern data from the Basin of Mexico and a consideration of the sociocultural connections between Teotihuacan and the Early Toltec epi-Teotihuacan states, I support my earlier model which utilizes a tightly reasoned cultural ecological (sociocultural factors pais environmental features) framework to account for and predict the locations of concentrations of Early Toltec period sites. Continuity between Teotihuacan and the Early Toltec period sites is stressed.

Type
Comment
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 40 , Issue 2Part1 , April 1975 , pp. 231 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanton, Richard E. 1972a Prehispanic adaptation in the Ixtapalapa Peninsula region, Mexico. Science 175:1317-1326.Google Scholar
Blanton, RichardE 1972b Prehispanic settlement patterns of the Ixtapalapa Peninsula region, Mexico. Pennsylvania State University, Occasional Papers in Anthropology 6.Google Scholar
Charlton, Thomas H. 1973 Texcoco region archaeology and the Codex Xolotl. American Antiquity 38:412-422.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Jose L. 1968 Clima y agricultura en Teotihuacan. In Materiales para la arqueologia de Teotihuacan, edited by Jose, L. Lorenzo. Instituto National de Antropologia e Historia, Investigaciones 17:51-72.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. Prehispanic settlement patterns in the Texcoco region, Mexico: preliminary conclusions. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, mimeographed.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 1970 An archaeological evaluation of the Codice Xolotl American Antiquity 35:431-440.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 1971a Prehistoric settlement patterns of the Texcoco region, Mexico. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Memoirs 3.Google Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R. 1971b Prehispanic settlement patterns of the Chalco region, Mexico, 1969 season. Report submitted to Departamento de Monumentos Prehispanicos, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico D.P. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, mimeographed.Google Scholar
Sanders, William T. 1965 The cultural ecology of the Teotihuacan valley. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, multi-lithed.Google Scholar