Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:24:57.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Culprits, Culpability, and Crime: Stocktheft and Other Cattle Maneuvers Among the Ila of Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Charles R. Cutshall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article examines stocktheft, cattle rustlers, and responses to stocktheft victimization within the broader context of overt and covert cattle manuevering among the Ila of Zambia. This article is concerned with setting the short-term parameters of individual and group decision-making which currently informs concepts of meritability (i.e., behavior meriting praise or esteem) or culpability (i.e., behavior meriting blame or condemnation) in cattle transactions with a historical framework of socioeconomic and legal change. The discussion is approached from the methodological perspectives of legal pluralism (Pound, 1906; Pospisil, 1967; Nader, 1969) and interactionist labeling theories of crime and deviance (Goffman, 1969; Becker, 1973). Both perspectives assert that within any polity there are a multiplicity of normative systems and legal levels which intersect and articulate variously in rule-making and rule-enforcing settings. In such settings, the authority to make decisions regarding the culpability or meritability of a behavior and the authority to sanction the culpable are typically matters of competition between individuals or groups of equal power, or conflict between individuals and groups of unequal power. There is, therefore, a political dimension latent in rule-making and rule-enforcement (Moore, 1978: 208). Moreover, there are often settings where the political dimension looms paramount.

In developing nations such as Zambia, which seek to use law and legal prohibitions to integrate culturally disparate populations such as the Ila within a homogeneous national polity (United National Independence Party), the question of what constitutes criminal culpability (substantive law) and what the proper procedures are for processing the criminally culpable (procedural law) has been subsumed within a lop-sided and conflictual dominant/subordinate power relationship. In this relationship, the state has retained sole jurisdiction in criminal matters while local jurisdiction encompasses only civil matters. At the same time, the state administers a criminal justice system largely predicated upon that of the former colonial justice framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Howard. (1973) Outsiders. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Canter, Richard. (1973) “Consequences of Legal Engineering: A Case from Zambia.” Paper presented at 72nd Annual Meeting of American Anthropological Association. New Orleans.Google Scholar
Colson, Elizabeth. (1953) “Social Control and Vengeance in Plateau Tonga Society.” Africa 23, 3: 199–212.Google Scholar
Cloward, Richard and Ohlin, Lloyd. (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Groups. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cutshall, Charles. (1980) “Disputing for Power: Elites and the Law among the Ila of Zambia.” Ph.D. dissertation. Boston University.Google Scholar
Cutshall, Charles. (In press) “The Politics of Death: Succession and Inheritance Disputes among the Ila of Zambia,” in Lancaster, C. S. (ed.), The Tonga-Speaking Peoples of Central Africa. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Cutshall, Charles, and McCold, Paul. (Manuscript) “Patterns of Stocktheft Victimization and Formal Response Strategies among the Ila of Zambia.”Google Scholar
Dentler, R., and Erickson, K.. (n.d.) “The Functions of Deviance in Groups.” Social Problems 9: 120–32.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F. (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing.” Law and Society Review 9, 1: 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielder, Robin. (1973) “The Role of Cattle in the Ila Economy.” African Social Research 15 (June): 327–61.Google Scholar
Fielder, Robin. (1979) “Economic Spheres in Pre-Colonial Ila Society.” African Social Research 28 (December): 617–42.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. (1969) Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Klockars, Carl. (1974) The Professional Fence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Gary, (n.d.) “Ironies of Social Control: Authorities as Contributors to Deviance through Escalation, Non-Enforcement, and Covert Facilitation.” (Manuscript).Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. (1971) “Changes in the Organization of Thieving,” in Cohen, S. (ed.), Images of Deviance. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally. (1978) “Uncertainties in Situations, Indeterminacies in Culture,” pp. 32–53 in Moore, Sally (ed.), Law as Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally (1978) “Introduction,” pp. 1–10 in Nader, L. (ed.), Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally (1978) “Introduction,” pp. 1–40 in Nader, L. and Todd, H. (eds.), The Disputing Process–Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Namwala District Notebook. (1920) Zambian National Archives: KSF: Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Namwala District Report. (1931) Zambian National Archives: KSF 1931.Google Scholar
Namwala District Livestock Office Report. (1976?) Government Printer: Lusaka.Google Scholar
Pospisil, Leopold. (1967) “Legal Levels and Multiplicity of Legal Systems in Human Societies.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 11 (1): 2–26.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. (1906) “The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice.” Reports of the American Bar Association 29, Part 1: 295–417.Google Scholar
Ruffini, Julio. (1978) “Disputing Over Livestock in Sardinia,” pp. 209–46 in Nader, L. and Todd, H. (eds.), The Disputing Process–Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Edwin, and Dale, Andrew. (1920) The Ila-Speaking Peoples of Northern Rhodesia. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Tuden, Arthur. (1968) “Ila Property Relationships and Political Process,” pp. 95–105 in Schwartz, M. (ed.), Local-Level Politics. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
Wellford, C. (1975) “Labelling Theory and Criminology: An Assessment.” Social Problems 22: 332–345.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Leslie. (Manuscript) “Problems with the Concept of Crime.”Google Scholar
Young, J. (1971) “The Police as Amplifiers of Deviancy,” pp. 93–112 in Cohen, S. (ed.), Images of Deviance. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar