Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:39:21.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Talk Goes Outside: Argument, Privacy and Power in Mambila Society Towards a Sociology of Embedded Praxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

David Zeitlyn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper the sociological implications of loud argument are considered, by taking a case study from the Mambila in Cameroon. Meetings of rotating credit societies are non-traditional forums where power and status are in dispute. These meetings contrast with both domestic arguments and with disputes held in the Chief's court. Rotating credit society meetings usually include arguments but these are dismissed as being unimportant by local informants. They pose a challenge for anthropological analysis since they are such a regular but disregarded—and disparaged—occurrence. Raised voices increase the range of bystanders as witnesses, so to argue loudly is a very social act.

Résumé

Cet article examine les implications sociologiques des disputes bruyantes, à travers le cas des Mambila au Cameroun. Les réunions d'associations de crédit tournant constituent des forums non-traditionnels au sein desquels on se dispute le pouvoir et le prestige. Ces réunions contrastent avec les conflits conjugaux et les disputes qui surviennent dans la cour de justice du Chef. Les réunions d'associations de crédit tournant sont généralement le théâtre de disputes, mais celles-ci sont jugées sans importance par des informateurs locaux. Elles posent un probleème pour l'analyse anthropologique compte tenu de leur survenance régulieère et cependant négligée—voire dénigrée. Hausser la voix permet d'attirer l'attention d'un plus grande nombre de passants et se disputer a` voix haute est un acte treès social.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , November 2003 , pp. 606 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ardener, S. 1964. ‘The comparative study of rotating credit associations’, Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute 94 (2): 201–229.Google Scholar
Ardener Shirley, and Burman, Sandra, (eds). 1995. Money-go-rounds: the importance of rotating savings and credit associations for women. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C. L. 1996. ‘Introduction’, in Briggs, C. L. (ed.), Disorderly Discourse: narrative, conflict and inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. L. 1997. ‘Introduction: from the ideal, the ordinary and the orderly to conflict and violence in pragmatic research’, Pragmatics 7 (4). Special issue (ed. C. L. Briggs): Conflict and Violence in Pragmatic Research.Google Scholar
Brown, P. B. and Levinson, S. C. 1978. ‘Universals in language use: politeness phenomena’, in Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and Politeness: strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. B. and Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Pat. 1997. African Voices, African Lives: personal narratives from a Swahili village. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dillon, Richard G. 1990. Ranking and Resistance: a precolonial Cameroonian polity in regional perspective. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin Ian MacDonald. 1996. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: linguistic anthropology in a Western Samoan village. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnell, Brenda. 1999. ‘Moving bodies, acting selves’, Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 341–373.Google Scholar
Farnell, Brenda. 2000. ‘Getting out of the habitus: an alternative model of dynamically embodied social action’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6 (3): 397–418.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1956. ‘Rumour in a primitive society’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53: 122–132.Google Scholar
Geschiere, Peter. 1997. The Modernity of Witchcraft: politics and the occult in postcolonial Africa. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press. First published in French 1995 as Sorcellerie et politique en Afrique. La viande des autres. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.). 1990. Conflict Talk: sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1977. Gossip, Reputation and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1996. ‘We want to borrow your mouth: Tzotzil marital squabbles’, in Briggs, C. L.(ed.), Disorderly Discourse: narrative, conflict and inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 1997. ‘Shouts, shrieks, and shots: unruly political conversations in indigenous Chiapas’, Pragmatics 7 (4): 547–573. Special issue on Conflict and Violence in Pragmatic Research, ed. by Briggs, C. L..Google Scholar
Haviland, Leslie K. andHaviland, John. 1983. ‘Privacy in a Mexican village’, in Benn, S. I. and Gaus, G. F. (eds), Public and Private in Social Life. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor. 1971. ‘Ancestors as elders’, Africa 41: 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Henrietta L. 1986. Space, Text and Gender: an anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, David. 1995. ‘Disputing human passion: the negotiation of the meaning of love among the Giriama of Kenya’, inCaplan, P.(ed.), Understanding Disputes: the politics of argument, pp. 161–180. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Piot, C. 1999. Remotely Global: village modernity in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rapport, Nigel. 1983. ‘Are Meanings Shared and Communicated? A study of the diversity of worldviews in a Cumbrian village’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Stroud, C. 1998. ‘Perspectives on cultural variability of discourse and some implications for code-switching’, in Auer, P. (ed.), Code-switching in Conversation: language, interaction and identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew J. andZeitlyn, David. 1995. ‘The distribution of person referring terms in natural conversation’, Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (1): 61–92.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, David. 1993. ‘Reconstructing kinship or the pragmatics of kin talk’, Man 28 (2): 199–224.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, David. 1994. Sua in Somié: Mambila traditional religion. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, David.forthcoming 2004. Words and Processes in Mambila Kinship: the theoretical importance of the complexity of everyday life. Washington DC: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, David. undated. ‘The documentary impulse: Pepys in the Bush’. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar