Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:31:17.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘The first fifty years of composite materials in aircraft construction’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Extract

The title of this article may surprise those who look upon composites as a recent innovation. The first major step was taken in 1940 when Dr Norman de Bruyne's Aero Research Ltd of Duxford, now part of the Ciba-Geigy Group, built a Spitfire fuselage in Aerolite, a material developed by them comprising flax thread skeined and impregnated with a phenolic resin and formed in a heated press. The project arose as a safeguard against a possible war-time shortage of aluminium alloys. Tests at RAE proved entirely satisfactory whilst the weight was the same as the metal version, see Figs 1-3.

In 1947 Turner Brothers developed a chrysotile asbestos fibre reinforced phenolic resin called Durestos. The wings of the experimental Fairey Delta E10/47 were built from it and were the first primary composite structures to be flown.

Since those days immense strides have been made in the use of advanced composites, most modern civil and military aircraft taking advantage of their unique properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Green, G. E. Composite Materials in Aircraft Structures. Ed: Middleton, D. H.. Longman. 1990, p 47.Google Scholar
2.Faculty of Aircraft Engineering, Delft Univ. via Akzo data sheet.Google Scholar
3. Baker, A. A. Ref. 1, pp 213217.Google Scholar
4. Elkins, C. A. Ref. 1, pp 379386.Google Scholar
5.Ref. 1, pp 228248.Google Scholar
6. Ref. 1, pp 260-272.Google Scholar
7. Richard N. Hadcock, . AIAA Paper X-29 Composite Wing.Google Scholar
8.Ref. 1, pp 304312.Google Scholar